• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cochrane corner: universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection.考科蓝专刊:新型冠状病毒感染的普遍筛查。
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Dec 16;37(Suppl 1):48. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.37.48.26881. eCollection 2020.
2
Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection: a rapid review.SARS-CoV-2 感染的普遍筛查:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 15;9(9):CD013718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013718.
3
Universal COVID-19 screening of 4040 health care workers in a resource-limited setting: an Egyptian pilot model in a university with 12 public hospitals and medical centers.在资源有限的情况下对 4040 名医护人员进行通用的 COVID-19 筛查:埃及在拥有 12 所公立医院和医疗中心的大学中的试点模式。
Int J Epidemiol. 2021 Mar 3;50(1):50-61. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa173.
4
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
5
Cochrane corner: rapid point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection.考科蓝专刊:用于 COVID-19 感染诊断的即时床边抗原和基于分子的检测。
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Sep 15;37(Suppl 1):10. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.37.10.25982. eCollection 2020.
6
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.用于诊断新型冠状病毒肺炎的胸部影像学检查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 30;9:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub2.
7
Comparison of In Situ Hybridization, Immunohistochemistry, and Reverse Transcription-Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Testing in Tissue.组织中用于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2) 检测的原位杂交、免疫组织化学和逆转录-液滴数字聚合酶链反应的比较。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 Jul 1;145(7):785-796. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0008-SA.
8
Comparison of molecular testing strategies for COVID-19 control: a mathematical modelling study.比较 COVID-19 控制的分子检测策略:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;20(12):1381-1389. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30630-7. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
9
Systematic screening on admission for SARS-CoV-2 to detect asymptomatic infections.入院时对 SARS-CoV-2 的系统性筛查,以检测无症状感染。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021 Feb 27;10(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13756-021-00912-z.
10
Comparison of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Screening Using Reverse Transcriptase-Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction or CRISPR-Based Assays in Asymptomatic College Students.无症状大学生中使用逆转录-定量聚合酶链反应或基于 CRISPR 的检测方法筛查严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037129. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37129.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance and usefulness of a novel automated immunoassay HISCL SARS-CoV-2 Antigen assay kit for the diagnosis of COVID-19.新型自动化免疫分析 HISCL SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测试剂盒用于 COVID-19 诊断的性能和实用性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 1;11(1):23196. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02636-x.
2
Impact of Mass Workplace COVID-19 Rapid Testing on Health and Healthcare Resource Savings.大规模工作场所 COVID-19 快速检测对健康和医疗资源节省的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 3;18(13):7129. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137129.
3
A Cost-Benefit Analysis of the COVID-19 Asymptomatic Mass Testing Strategy in the North Metropolitan Area of Barcelona.巴塞罗那都市区北部 COVID-19 无症状大规模检测策略的成本效益分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 30;18(13):7028. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137028.

本文引用的文献

1
Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection: a rapid review.SARS-CoV-2 感染的普遍筛查:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 15;9(9):CD013718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013718.
2
Detection of imported COVID-19 cases worldwide: early assessment of airport entry screening, 24 January until 17 February 2020.全球输入性新冠肺炎病例的检测:2020年1月24日至2月17日机场入境筛查的早期评估
Trop Med Health. 2020 Sep 14;48:79. doi: 10.1186/s41182-020-00260-5. eCollection 2020.
3
Universal screening for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) for asymptomatic parturients: May not be beneficial at this time.对无症状产妇进行2019年新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的普遍筛查:目前可能并无益处。
J Med Virol. 2021 Mar;93(3):1198-1200. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26507. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
4
Universal screening for the SARS-CoV-2 virus on hospital admission in an area with low COVID-19 prevalence.在新冠病毒病(COVID-19)患病率较低的地区,对入院患者进行严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)病毒的普遍筛查。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;41(10):1231-1233. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.358. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
5
Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 before labor admission during Covid-19 pandemic in Madrid.马德里在 COVID-19 大流行期间对临产孕妇进行 SARS-CoV-2 普筛
J Perinat Med. 2020 Nov 26;48(9):981-984. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0236.
6
COVID 19: Should we consider universal screening in trauma patients?新型冠状病毒肺炎:我们应该考虑对创伤患者进行普遍筛查吗?
Injury. 2020 Aug;51(8):1942. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.06.013. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
7
The prospects for the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Africa.非洲地区 SARS-CoV-2 大流行的前景。
EMBO Mol Med. 2020 Jun 8;12(6):e12488. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202012488. Epub 2020 May 5.
8
Effectiveness of airport screening at detecting travellers infected with novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV).机场筛查对检测新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)感染旅行者的有效性。
Euro Surveill. 2020 Feb;25(5). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.5.2000080.
9
Exit and Entry Screening Practices for Infectious Diseases among Travelers at Points of Entry: Looking for Evidence on Public Health Impact.入境口岸旅行者传染病出入境筛查实践:寻找对公共卫生影响的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 21;16(23):4638. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234638.
10
Entry screening to delay local transmission of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1).入境筛查可延缓 2009 年大流行流感 A(H1N1)的本地传播。
BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Mar 30;10:82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-82.

考科蓝专刊:新型冠状病毒感染的普遍筛查。

Cochrane corner: universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

机构信息

Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.

Communicable Disease Control, Department of Health, Western Cape, South Africa.

出版信息

Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Dec 16;37(Suppl 1):48. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.37.48.26881. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.37.48.26881
PMID:33552376
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7846260/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Most people infected with SARS-CoV-2 have mild disease with non-specific symptoms, although a few becoming critically ill with septic shock and multiple organ failure. There is an unknown proportion of infected individuals who remain asymptomatic and infectious. Universal screening for COVID-19 infections to detect individuals who are infected before they present clinically could therefore be an important measure to contain the spread of the disease. We highlight a Cochrane rapid review which assessed the effectiveness and accuracy of universal screening for COVID-19 infection.

METHODS

the authors of the Cochrane review searched multiple electronic databases to identify studies reporting on the effectiveness of universal screening and reporting on screening test accuracy. Eligible participants for the review included people who had not sought care for potential COVID-19 symptoms.

RESULTS

the authors included 22 publications, with none of them conducted in Africa. Two modelling studies reported on the beneficial and negative effects of screening; and 20 studies (cohort and modelling) reported data on the accuracy of screening tests. The included studies had wide variability in the baseline prevalence of COVID-19 infection as well as study settings and methods. All cohort studies compared screening strategies to reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as the gold standard. The rapid review suggests that there is low certainty of evidence that screening at travel hubs may slow the importation of infected cases. Furthermore, the review highlights the uncertainty and variation in the accuracy of screening.

CONCLUSION

given the low accuracy of the tests included in this review, a high proportion of COVID-19 infected individuals may be missed and go on to infect others. In addition, some healthy individuals may be falsely identified as positive, requiring confirmatory testing and potentially leading to the unnecessary isolation of these individuals.

摘要

简介

新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)由新型冠状病毒,即严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2(SARS-CoV-2)引起。大多数感染 SARS-CoV-2 的人患有轻度疾病,症状不具特异性,尽管少数人会发展为感染性休克和多器官衰竭的重症患者。还有一部分感染个体无症状且具有传染性,未知比例。对 COVID-19 感染进行普遍筛查,以发现临床前感染的个体,因此可能是控制疾病传播的重要措施。我们强调了 Cochrane 快速评价,该评价评估了对 COVID-19 感染进行普遍筛查的效果和准确性。

方法

Cochrane 评价的作者检索了多个电子数据库,以确定报告普遍筛查效果和报告筛查检测准确性的研究。该评价的合格参与者包括未因潜在 COVID-19 症状而寻求治疗的人。

结果

作者纳入了 22 篇出版物,没有一篇在非洲进行。两项建模研究报告了筛查的有益和负面影响;20 项研究(队列和建模)报告了筛查检测准确性的数据。纳入的研究在 COVID-19 感染的基线患病率以及研究环境和方法方面存在很大差异。所有队列研究都将筛查策略与逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)作为金标准进行了比较。快速评价表明,有低确定性证据表明,在旅行枢纽进行筛查可能会减缓感染病例的输入。此外,该评价强调了筛查准确性的不确定性和差异。

结论

鉴于本评价中包含的检测方法准确性较低,可能会错过大量 COVID-19 感染个体,并继续感染其他人。此外,一些健康个体可能被错误地识别为阳性,需要进行确认性检测,并且可能导致这些个体不必要的隔离。