Dommasch Michael, Steger Alexander, Barthel Petra, Huster Katharina M, Müller Alexander, Sinnecker Daniel, Laugwitz Karl-Ludwig, Penzel Thomas, Lubinski Andrzej, Flevari Panagiota, Harden Markus, Friede Tim, Kääb Stefan, Merkely Bela, Sticherling Christian, Willems Rik, Huikuri Heikki V, Bauer Axel, Malik Marek, Zabel Markus, Schmidt Georg
Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
German Center for Cardiovascular Research partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany.
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Dec 21;31:100695. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100695. eCollection 2021 Jan.
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) prevent sudden cardiac death. ICD implantation decisions are currently based on reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF≤35%). However, in some patients, the non-arrhythmic death risk predominates thus diminishing ICD-therapy benefits. Based on previous observations, we tested the hypothesis that compared to the others, patients with nocturnal respiratory rate (NRR) ≥18 breaths per minute (brpm) benefit less from prophylactic ICD implantations.
This prospective cohort study was a pre-defined sub-study of EU-CERT-ICD trial conducted at 44 centers in 15 EU countries between May 12, 2014, and September 6, 2018. Patients with ischaemic or non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy were included if meeting primary prophylactic ICD implantation criteria. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. NRR was assessed blindly from pre-implantation 24-hour Holters. Multivariable models and propensity stratification evaluated the interaction between NRR and the ICD mortality effect. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT0206419).
Of the 2,247 EU-CERT-ICD patients, this sub-study included 1,971 with complete records. In 1,363 patients (61.7 (12) years; 244 women) an ICD was implanted; 608 patients (63.2 (12) years; 108 women) were treated conservatively. During a median 2.5-year follow-up, 202 (14.8%) and 95 (15.6%) patients died in the ICD and control groups, respectively. NRR statistically significantly interacted with the ICD mortality effect ( = 0.0070). While the 1,316 patients with NRR<18 brpm showed a marked ICD benefit on mortality (adjusted HR 0.529 (95% CI 0.376-0.746); = 0.0003), no treatment effect was demonstrated in 655 patients with NRR≥18 brpm (adjusted HR 0.981 (95% CI 0.669-1.438); = 0.9202).
In the EU-CERT-ICD trial, patients with NRR≥18 brpm showed limited benefit from primary prophylactic ICD implantation. Those with NRR<18 brpm benefitted substantially.
European Community's 7th Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013 (602299).
植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)可预防心源性猝死。目前ICD植入决策是基于左心室射血分数降低(LVEF≤35%)。然而,在一些患者中,非心律失常死亡风险占主导,从而降低了ICD治疗的益处。基于先前的观察结果,我们检验了这样一个假设:与其他患者相比,夜间呼吸频率(NRR)≥18次/分钟(brpm)的患者从预防性ICD植入中获益较少。
这项前瞻性队列研究是欧盟-ICD认证试验的一项预先定义的子研究,该试验于2014年5月12日至2018年9月6日在15个欧盟国家的44个中心进行。符合原发性预防性ICD植入标准的缺血性或非缺血性心肌病患者被纳入研究。主要终点是全因死亡率。NRR通过植入前24小时动态心电图进行盲法评估。多变量模型和倾向分层评估了NRR与ICD死亡率效应之间的相互作用。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT0206419)。
在2247例欧盟-ICD认证试验患者中,本项子研究纳入了1971例有完整记录的患者。1363例患者(61.7(12)岁;244例女性)植入了ICD;608例患者(63.2(12)岁;108例女性)接受了保守治疗。在中位2.5年的随访期间,ICD组和对照组分别有202例(14.8%)和95例(15.6%)患者死亡。NRR与ICD死亡率效应在统计学上有显著的相互作用(P = 0.0070)。虽然131