抗阻训练至力竭和非力竭对肌肉力量、肥大和功率输出的影响：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Effects of Resistance Training Performed to Failure or Not to Failure on Muscle Strength, Hypertrophy, and Power Output: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.
机构信息
Exercise Research Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Dance, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul.
Department of Public Health, University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
出版信息
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Apr 1;35(4):1165-1175. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003936.
Vieira, AF, Umpierre, D, Teodoro, JL, Lisboa, SC, Baroni, BM, Izquierdo, M, and Cadore, EL. Effects of resistance training performed to failure or not to failure on muscle strength, hypertrophy, and power output: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 35(4): 1165-1175, 2021-The aim of this review was to summarize the evidence from longitudinal studies assessing the effects induced by resistance training (RT) performed to failure (RTF) vs. not to failure (RTNF) on muscle strength, hypertrophy, and power output in adults. Three electronic databases were searched using terms related to RTF and RTNF. Studies were eligible if they met the following criteria: randomized and nonrandomized studies comparing the effects of RTF vs. RTNF on muscle hypertrophy, maximal strength, and muscle power in adults, and RT intervention ≥6 weeks. Results were presented as standardized mean differences (SMDs) between treatments with 95% confidence intervals, and calculations were performed using random effects models. Significance was accepted when p < 0.05. Thirteen studies were included in this review. No difference was found between RTF and RTNF on maximal strength in overall analysis (SMD: -0.08; p = 0.642), but greater strength increase was observed in RTNF considering nonequalized volumes (SMD: -0.34; p = 0.048). Resistance training performed to failure showed a greater increase in muscle hypertrophy than RTNF (SMD: 0.75; p = 0.005), whereas no difference was observed considering equalized RT volumes. No difference was found between RTF and RTNF on muscle power considering overall analysis (SMD: -0.20; p = 0.239), whereas greater improvement was observed in RTNF considering nonequalized RT volumes (SMD: -0.61; p = 0.025). Resistance training not to failure may induce comparable or even greater improvements in maximal dynamic strength and power output, whereas no difference between RTF vs. RTNF is observed on muscle hypertrophy, considering equalized RT volumes.
维埃拉，AF，翁皮埃尔，D，特奥多罗，JL，利贝罗，SC，巴罗尼，BM，伊齐亚尔迪，M，和卡多雷，EL。力竭与非力竭抗阻训练对肌肉力量、肥大和力量输出的影响：系统评价和荟萃分析。J 力量与体能研究 35（4）：1165-1175，2021-本综述的目的是总结纵向研究的证据，评估力竭（RTF）与非力竭（RTNF）抗阻训练对成年人肌肉力量、肥大和力量输出的影响。使用与 RTF 和 RTNF 相关的术语对三个电子数据库进行了搜索。如果研究符合以下标准，则被认为是合格的：比较 RTF 与 RTNF 对成年人肌肉肥大、最大力量和肌肉力量影响的随机和非随机研究，以及 RT 干预时间≥6 周。结果以治疗之间的标准化均数差（SMD）表示，并使用随机效应模型进行计算。当 p<0.05 时，结果被认为具有统计学意义。本综述共纳入 13 项研究。总体分析中，RTF 与 RTNF 对最大力量无差异（SMD：-0.08；p=0.642），但在考虑不等同训练量时，RTNF 观察到更大的力量增加（SMD：-0.34；p=0.048）。力竭抗阻训练比 RTNF 更能增加肌肉肥大（SMD：0.75；p=0.005），而考虑到同等 RT 量时，两者无差异。总体分析中，RTF 与 RTNF 对肌肉力量无差异（SMD：-0.20；p=0.239），但在考虑不等同 RT 量时，RTNF 观察到更大的改善（SMD：-0.61；p=0.025）。非力竭抗阻训练可能会引起最大动态力量和力量输出的相似或甚至更大的改善，而在考虑同等 RT 量时，RTF 与 RTNF 之间的肌肉肥大无差异。
Zotero 插件