• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Recognition of Facial Emotion Expressions in Patients with Depressive Disorders: A Prospective, Observational Study.抑郁症患者面部情绪表达的识别:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Neurol Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):225-234. doi: 10.1007/s40120-021-00231-w. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
2
Emotional context effect on recognition of varying facial emotion expression intensities in depression.情绪背景对抑郁症患者识别不同面部情绪表达强度的影响。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jul 1;308:141-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.070. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
3
Variation in recognition of happy and sad facial expressions and self-reported depressive symptom severity: A prospective cohort study.快乐和悲伤面部表情识别的差异与自我报告的抑郁症状严重程度:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Oct 1;257:461-469. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.025. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
4
Biased processing of neutral facial expressions is associated with depressive symptoms and suicide ideation in individuals at risk for major depression due to affective temperaments.由于情感气质而有患重度抑郁症风险的个体,对中性面部表情的偏向性处理与抑郁症状和自杀意念有关。
Compr Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;55(3):518-25. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
5
Biased recognition of facial affect in patients with major depressive disorder reflects clinical state.重度抑郁症患者对面部表情的偏向性识别反映了临床状态。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 3;10(6):e0129863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129863. eCollection 2015.
6
Perceptive biases in major depressive episode.重度抑郁发作中的感知偏差。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 18;9(2):e86832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086832. eCollection 2014.
7
Recognition of emotional facial expressions in anxious and nonanxious depression.焦虑性抑郁和非焦虑性抑郁中对情绪性面部表情的识别
Compr Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;70:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
8
State-dependent alteration in face emotion recognition in depression.抑郁患者对面部情绪识别的状态依赖性改变。
Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;198(4):302-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.078139. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
9
[Associations between symptom severity and emotion recognition in depressed patients].[抑郁症患者症状严重程度与情绪识别之间的关联]
Psychiatr Hung. 2009;24(1):68-73.
10
Perception of happy and sad facial expressions in chronic schizophrenia: evidence for two evaluative systems.慢性精神分裂症患者对快乐和悲伤面部表情的感知:两种评估系统的证据。
Schizophr Res. 2002 May 1;55(1-2):171-7. doi: 10.1016/s0920-9964(01)00208-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Brain Activation According to fMRI Data in Patient with Depression (After Acute Coronary Syndrome and Somatically Healthy) and Healthy Volunteers.根据功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据对抑郁症患者(急性冠状动脉综合征后及身体健康者)与健康志愿者大脑激活情况的比较。
Iran J Psychiatry. 2024 Jan;19(1):11-20. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v19i1.14335.
2
Facial emotion recognition in patients with depression compared to healthy controls when using human avatars.使用人类化身时,比较抑郁症患者与健康对照者的面部情绪识别。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 12;13(1):6007. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31277-5.
3
Recognition of Facial Emotion Expressions in Patients with Depressive Disorders: A Functional MRI Study.抑郁症患者面部情绪表情识别的功能磁共振成像研究。
Tomography. 2023 Feb 27;9(2):529-540. doi: 10.3390/tomography9020043.
4
Depression and Cognitive Impairment: Current Understanding of Its Neurobiology and Diagnosis.抑郁症与认知障碍:对其神经生物学及诊断的当前认识
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2022 Nov 29;18:2783-2794. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S383093. eCollection 2022.
5
Placebo induced expectations of mood enhancement generate a positivity effect in emotional processing.安慰剂诱导的情绪增强预期会在情绪处理中产生正性效应。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 29;12(1):5345. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09342-2.

本文引用的文献

1
The Gender Difference in Depression: Are Elderly Women at Greater Risk for Depression Than Elderly Men?抑郁症中的性别差异:老年女性患抑郁症的风险是否比老年男性更高?
Geriatrics (Basel). 2017 Nov 15;2(4):35. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics2040035.
2
[The features of emotional processing in patients with depressive disorders].[抑郁症患者情绪加工的特征]
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2018;118(8):11-17. doi: 10.17116/jnevro201811808111.
3
Cognitive remission: a novel objective for the treatment of major depression?认知缓解:重度抑郁症治疗的一个新目标?
BMC Med. 2016 Jan 22;14:9. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0560-3.
4
Cognitive impairment in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抑郁症中的认知障碍:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2014 Jul;44(10):2029-40. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713002535. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
5
Hot and cold cognition in depression.抑郁的冷热认知。
CNS Spectr. 2013 Jun;18(3):139-49. doi: 10.1017/S1092852913000072. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
6
A systematic meta-analysis of the Stroop task in depression.抑郁症 Stroop 任务的系统元分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Jun;32(4):316-28. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
7
Cognitive mechanisms of treatment in depression.抑郁治疗的认知机制。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Jan;37(1):117-36. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.183. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
8
Recognition of disgusted facial expressions in severe depression.重度抑郁症患者对厌恶表情的识别。
Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;197(2):156-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.078113.
9
Processing of facial emotion expression in major depression: a review.重度抑郁症患者面部情绪表达的处理:综述。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;44(8):681-96. doi: 10.3109/00048674.2010.496359.
10
Affective cognition and its disruption in mood disorders.情感认知及其在心境障碍中的障碍。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011 Jan;36(1):153-82. doi: 10.1038/npp.2010.77. Epub 2010 Jun 23.

抑郁症患者面部情绪表达的识别:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Recognition of Facial Emotion Expressions in Patients with Depressive Disorders: A Prospective, Observational Study.

作者信息

Akhapkin Roman Vitalievich, Volel Beatrisa Albertovna, Shishorin Rodion Mikhailovich, Ustyuzhanin Dmitry Vladimirovich, Petelin Dmitry Sergeevich

机构信息

V.P. Serbsky National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology, Moscow, Russia.

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Neurol Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):225-234. doi: 10.1007/s40120-021-00231-w. Epub 2021 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1007/s40120-021-00231-w
PMID:33558996
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8140166/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Processing of emotional stimuli is altered in patients with depression. The present feasibility study investigated the features of emotional information recognition in people with depressive disorders and how these differ from individuals without depression to determine whether response times could potentially be used as a diagnostic marker to identify individuals at high risk of depression and as an indicator of antidepressant medication response.

METHODS

The study recruited 32 individuals, 16 with single or recurrent depressive episodes and 16 control subjects without depression. Patients with depression received 8 weeks of antidepressant therapy. The severity of depressive symptoms at baseline and their changes on prescribed therapy were assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The processing of emotional information was assessed using the computerized Penn Emotion Recognition Task (ER-40).

RESULTS

The two groups were well matched in terms of age and gender. There was no difference between the groups in their ability to correctly recognize happy or sad emotional facial expressions, but the average time patients with depression took to recognize a happy face was significantly longer than controls. In addition, they were more likely to misinterpret facial expressions as non-emotional. In patients with depression, the mean MADRS total score decreased from 26.3 ± 4.4 at baseline to 11.1 ± 8.9 at 8 weeks, a reduction of 57.8%. The proportion of responders with greater than 50% reduction in their baseline MADRS total score was 64.3%. Antidepressive treatment was associated with a reduction in the mean time required for recognition of a happy face (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with depression are slower to identify positive emotions but have a similar time to recognition of negative emotions as patients without depression. The greater time required for recognition of happiness distinguished the patients with depression from control subjects, and was also the only parameter that showed an improvement with antidepressant therapy, suggesting a specific relationship of this parameter with the depressive state.

摘要

引言

抑郁症患者对情绪刺激的处理会发生改变。本可行性研究调查了抑郁症患者情绪信息识别的特征,以及这些特征与非抑郁症患者的差异,以确定反应时间是否有可能作为诊断标志物来识别抑郁症高危个体,并作为抗抑郁药物治疗反应的指标。

方法

该研究招募了32名个体,其中16名患有单次或复发性抑郁发作,16名无抑郁症的对照受试者。抑郁症患者接受了8周的抗抑郁治疗。使用蒙哥马利-Åsberg抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评估基线时抑郁症状的严重程度及其在规定治疗中的变化。使用计算机化的宾夕法尼亚情绪识别任务(ER-40)评估情绪信息的处理情况。

结果

两组在年龄和性别方面匹配良好。两组在正确识别快乐或悲伤情绪面部表情的能力上没有差异,但抑郁症患者识别快乐面孔的平均时间明显长于对照组。此外,他们更有可能将面部表情误解为无情感的。在抑郁症患者中,MADRS总分平均值从基线时的26.3±4.4降至8周时的11.1±8.9,降低了57.8%。基线MADRS总分降低超过50%的反应者比例为64.3%。抗抑郁治疗与识别快乐面孔所需的平均时间减少相关(P<0.05)。

结论

抑郁症患者识别积极情绪的速度较慢,但识别消极情绪的时间与非抑郁症患者相似。识别快乐所需的更长时间将抑郁症患者与对照受试者区分开来,并且也是唯一显示抗抑郁治疗有改善的参数,表明该参数与抑郁状态存在特定关系。