• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者错误使用吸入器的原因。

Determinants of incorrect inhaler technique in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.

Department of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Jun;75(6):e14073. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14073. Epub 2021 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1111/ijcp.14073
PMID:33559260
Abstract

AIMS

There is a lack of an overview of determinants of incorrect inhaler technique among chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) subjects. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and possible determinants of incorrect inhaler technique in COPD subjects with common inhalers.

METHODS

A cross over study was conducted in 180 COPD subjects. Baseline assessment of inhaler technique was evaluated in 10 placebo inhalers including: [pressurised metered dose inhaler (pMDI), Aerolizer, Handihaler, Turbohaler, Discus, Breezhaler, Ellipta, Easyhaler, Diskhaler and Respimat] without receiving any instructions. Subjects were then crossed over to other inhalers in random order. Inhaler technique was assessed. The proper technique of inhalers was demonstrated and the number of counselling attempts needed to achieve a correct technique was recorded. Patient past-experience, demographics/clinical variables were recorded.

RESULTS

Incorrect inhaler techniques were highly prevalent among COPD subjects, ranging from 80% of participants demonstrated incorrect use, a minimum of 1 error, with Ellipta, to 100% with Respimat/Diskhaler (P < .001). Past-experience (OR = 14.639 at P < .001) and inhaler-type (OR = 10.397 at P < .001, 4.267 at P =. 007, 2.664 at P =. 057, 8.666 at P =. 001, 10.250 at P < .001, 0.613 at P =. 212 and 0.265 at P< .001 for pMDI, Aerolizer, Handihaler, Turbohaler, Discus, Breezhaler and Ellipta, respectively) were the strongest determinants of incorrect technique followed by gender (OR = 0.310 at P < .001), age category (OR = 0.307 at P < .001) and GOLD group (OR = 2.289 at P =. 005).

CONCLUSION

Incorrect inhaler techniques are highly prevalent among COPD subjects. Lack of past-experience, certain inhaler types, female gender, older age and lower GOLD group are the most significant determinants of incorrect technique.

摘要

目的

目前缺乏对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中不正确吸入器技术的决定因素的全面了解。本研究的目的是确定在使用常见吸入器的 COPD 患者中,不正确吸入器技术的流行程度和可能的决定因素。

方法

在 180 名 COPD 患者中进行了一项交叉研究。在未接受任何指导的情况下,对 10 个安慰剂吸入器(包括:[压力定量吸入器(pMDI)、Aerolizer、Handihaler、Turbohaler、Discus、Breezhaler、Ellipta、Easyhaler、Diskhaler 和 Respimat])的吸入器技术进行了基线评估。然后,患者随机交叉使用其他吸入器。评估吸入器技术。演示正确的吸入器技术,并记录达到正确技术所需的咨询尝试次数。记录患者过去的经验、人口统计学/临床变量。

结果

在 COPD 患者中,不正确的吸入器技术非常普遍,从最低的 1 个错误(80%的参与者使用 Ellipta 时表现出不正确的使用)到 100%的患者使用 Respimat/Diskhaler(P<.001)。过去的经验(OR=14.639,P<.001)和吸入器类型(OR=10.397,P<.001,4.267,P=.007,2.664,P=.057,8.666,P=.001,10.250,P<.001,0.613,P=.212 和 0.265,P<.001,pMDI、Aerolizer、Handihaler、Turbohaler、Discus、Breezhaler 和 Ellipta)是不正确技术的最强决定因素,其次是性别(OR=0.310,P<.001)、年龄类别(OR=0.307,P<.001)和 GOLD 组(OR=2.289,P=.005)。

结论

不正确的吸入器技术在 COPD 患者中非常普遍。缺乏过去的经验、某些吸入器类型、女性、年龄较大和较低的 GOLD 组是不正确技术的最显著决定因素。

相似文献

1
Determinants of incorrect inhaler technique in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者错误使用吸入器的原因。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Jun;75(6):e14073. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14073. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
2
First-time handling of different inhalers by chronic obstructive lung disease patients.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者首次使用不同吸入器。
Exp Lung Res. 2020 Sep;46(7):258-269. doi: 10.1080/01902148.2020.1789903. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
3
Real-life assessment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient performance with different inhalers.不同吸入器对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的实际表现评估。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Apr;75(4):e13905. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13905. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
4
A randomised open-label cross-over study of inhaler errors, preference and time to achieve correct inhaler use in patients with COPD or asthma: comparison of ELLIPTA with other inhaler devices.一项比较 Ellipta 与其他吸入器设备的在 COPD 或哮喘患者中发生的吸入器错误、偏好以及达到正确使用吸入器时间的随机、开放标签、交叉研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2016 Nov 24;26:16079. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.79.
5
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
6
Technical Evaluation of Soft Mist Inhaler Use in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study.软雾吸入器在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的使用技术评估:一项横断面研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Jun 22;15:1471-1479. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S253338. eCollection 2020.
7
Factors associated with appropriate inhaler use in patients with COPD - lessons from the REAL survey.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者正确使用吸入器的相关因素——来自真实调查的经验教训
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Feb 26;13:695-702. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S149404. eCollection 2018.
8
Comparative Study of Inhaler Device Handling Technique and Risk Factors for Critical Inhaler Errors in Korean COPD Patients.韩国 COPD 患者吸入器装置使用技术比较研究及严重吸入器错误的危险因素。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Apr 19;16:1051-1059. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S303761. eCollection 2021.
9
Assessment of Inhaler Satisfaction and Determinants of High Satisfaction Among Korean COPD Patients.评估韩国 COPD 患者的吸入器满意度和高满意度的决定因素。
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Nov 28;37(46):e327. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e327.
10
Evaluating inhaler use technique in COPD patients.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的吸入器使用技术。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Jul 8;10:1291-8. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S85681. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Preliminary Bronchodilation Effect on Aerosol Delivery from a Dry Powder Inhaler for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Suboptimal Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate.对吸气峰流速未达最佳的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者,评估干粉吸入器气溶胶递送的初步支气管扩张效果。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2025 Aug 29. doi: 10.1007/s40262-025-01560-x.
2
Experience of Using Electronic Inhaler Monitoring Devices for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or Asthma: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.慢性阻塞性肺疾病或哮喘患者使用电子吸入器监测设备的经验:定性研究的系统评价
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 May 16;13:e57645. doi: 10.2196/57645.
3
Recalibrating Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Nebulizers versus Inhalers for Maintenance Therapy in COPD: Past as Prologue.
重新校准慢性阻塞性肺疾病维持治疗中雾化器与吸入器的认知和态度:以史为鉴。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 Nov 28;19:2571-2586. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S491275. eCollection 2024.
4
Prevalence and Factors Affecting Appropriate Inhaler Use in Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Prospective Study.老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入器正确使用情况的患病率及影响因素:一项前瞻性研究。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 30;12(13):4420. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134420.
5
Treatment patterns and cost of exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using multiple inhaler triple therapy in South Korea.韩国采用多种吸入器三联疗法治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者加重的治疗模式和费用。
Respir Res. 2022 Sep 5;23(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02136-0.
6
Impact of Sex on Proper Use of Inhaler Devices in Asthma and COPD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.性别对哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入装置正确使用的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Jul 28;14(8):1565. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14081565.