Suppr超能文献

老年人中保持-放松法与静态拉伸的急性效应比较

Comparison of the Acute Effects of Hold-Relax and Static Stretching among Older Adults.

作者信息

Nakamura Masatoshi, Sato Shigeru, Kiyono Ryosuke, Yahata Kaoru, Yoshida Riku, Fukaya Taizan, Konrad Andreas

机构信息

Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-ku, Niigata City, Niigata 950-3198, Japan.

Department of Physical Therapy, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-ku, Niigata City, Niigata 950-3198, Japan.

出版信息

Biology (Basel). 2021 Feb 5;10(2):126. doi: 10.3390/biology10020126.

Abstract

Various stretching techniques are generally recommended to counteract age-related declines in range of motion (ROM) and/or increased muscle stiffness. However, to date, an effective stretching technique has not yet been established for older adults. Consequently, we compared the acute effects of hold relax stretching (HRS) and static stretching (SS) on dorsiflexion (DF) ROM and muscle stiffness among older adults. Overall, 15 elderly men and nine elderly women (70.2 ± 3.9 years, 160.8 ± 7.8 cm, 59.6 ± 9.7 kg) were enrolled, and both legs were randomized to either HRS or SS stretching. We measured DF ROM and muscle stiffness using a dynamometer and ultrasonography before and after 120 s of HRS or SS interventions. Our multivariate analysis indicated no significant interaction effects, but a main effect for DF ROM. Post-hoc tests revealed that DF ROM was increased after both HRS and SS interventions. Moreover, multivariate analysis showed a significant interaction effect for muscle stiffness. Post-hoc tests revealed that muscle stiffness was decreased significantly after only SS intervention. Taken together, our results indicated that both HRS and SS interventions are recommended to increase ROM, and SS is recommended to decrease muscle stiffness in older adults.

摘要

一般推荐采用各种伸展技术来抵消与年龄相关的关节活动范围(ROM)下降和/或肌肉僵硬增加。然而,迄今为止,尚未为老年人建立一种有效的伸展技术。因此,我们比较了老年人中持续放松伸展(HRS)和静态伸展(SS)对背屈(DF)ROM和肌肉僵硬的急性影响。总共招募了15名老年男性和9名老年女性(年龄70.2±3.9岁,身高160.8±7.8厘米,体重59.6±9.7千克),双腿随机分为接受HRS或SS伸展。我们在HRS或SS干预120秒前后,使用测力计和超声测量DF ROM和肌肉僵硬。我们的多变量分析表明没有显著的交互作用,但对DF ROM有主效应。事后检验显示,HRS和SS干预后DF ROM均增加。此外,多变量分析显示对肌肉僵硬有显著的交互作用。事后检验显示,仅在SS干预后肌肉僵硬显著降低。综上所述,我们的结果表明,推荐HRS和SS干预来增加ROM,推荐SS来降低老年人的肌肉僵硬。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54e3/7914644/43f0af090b82/biology-10-00126-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验