Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Department of Human Sciences, Italian University Line-IUL, 50122 Florance, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 17;19(24):16974. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416974.
Flexibility training is a fundamental biological process that improves the quality of life of the elderly by improving the ranges of motion of joints, postural balance and locomotion, and thus reducing the risk of falling. Two different training programs were assessed acutely and after 12 weeks by means of the sit-and-reach test. Thirty-one healthy older adults were randomly divided into three groups: the Experiment I group (Exp) performed strength and static stretching exercises; the Experiment II group performed dynamic and static stretching exercises; and participants assigned to the control group maintained a sedentary lifestyle for the entire period of the study. Flexibility acutely increased in Exp I by the first (ΔT0 = 7.63 ± 1.26%; ES = 0.36; = 0.002) and second testing sessions (ΔT1 = 3.74 ± 0.91%; ES = 0.20; = 0.002). Similarly, it increased in Exp II significantly by the first (ΔT0 = 14.21 ± 3.42%; ES = 0.20; = 0.011) and second testing sessions (ΔT1 = 9.63 ± 4.29%; ES = 0.13; = 0.005). Flexibility significantly increased over the 12 weeks of training in Exp I (ΔT0 - T1 = 9.03 ± 3.14%; ES = 0.41; = 0.020) and Exp II (ΔT0 - T1 = 22.96 ± 9.87%; ES = 0.35; = 0.005). The acute and chronic differences between the two groups were not significant ( > 0.05). These results suggest the effectiveness of different exercise typologies in improving the flexibility of the posterior muscular chains in older adults. Therefore, the selection of a program to optimize training interventions could be based on the physical characteristics of the participants.
柔韧性训练是一种基本的生物学过程,通过改善关节活动范围、姿势平衡和运动能力,提高老年人的生活质量,从而降低跌倒的风险。通过坐-立前伸测试,在急性和 12 周后评估了两种不同的训练方案。31 名健康的老年人被随机分为三组:实验组 I(Exp)进行力量和静态伸展运动;实验组 II 进行动态和静态伸展运动;对照组的参与者在整个研究期间保持久坐的生活方式。在 Exp I 中,柔韧性在第一次(ΔT0 = 7.63 ± 1.26%;ES = 0.36; = 0.002)和第二次测试中急性增加,在第二次测试中(ΔT1 = 3.74 ± 0.91%;ES = 0.20; = 0.002)。同样,在 Exp II 中,它在第一次(ΔT0 = 14.21 ± 3.42%;ES = 0.20; = 0.011)和第二次测试中显著增加,在第二次测试中(ΔT1 = 9.63 ± 4.29%;ES = 0.13; = 0.005)。在 Exp I(ΔT0 - T1 = 9.03 ± 3.14%;ES = 0.41; = 0.020)和 Exp II(ΔT0 - T1 = 22.96 ± 9.87%;ES = 0.35; = 0.005)的 12 周训练中,柔韧性显著增加。两组之间的急性和慢性差异没有统计学意义(>0.05)。这些结果表明,不同的运动类型在提高老年人后链肌肉柔韧性方面是有效的。因此,选择一个方案来优化训练干预措施,可以基于参与者的身体特征。