Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 13123 E. 16th Ave., Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands.
Pediatr Radiol. 2021 Jun;51(7):1192-1201. doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04952-2. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
Conventional pediatric volumetric MRI acquisitions of a short-axis stack typically require multiple breath-holds under anesthesia.
Here, we aimed to validate a vendor-optimized compressed-sensing approach to reduce scan time during short-axis balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) cine imaging.
Imaging was performed in 28 patients (16±9 years) in this study on a commercial 3-tesla (T) scanner using retrospective electrocardiogram-gated cine bSSFP. Cine short-axis images covering both ventricles were acquired with conventional parallel imaging and a vendor-optimized parallel imaging/compressed-sensing approach. Qualitative Likert scoring for blood-myocardial contrast, edge definition, and presence of artifact was performed by two experienced radiologists. Quantitative comparisons were performed including biventricular size and function. A paired t-test was used to detect significant differences (P<0.05).
Scan duration was 7±2 s/slice for conventional imaging (147±33 s total) vs. 4±2 s/slice for compressed sensing (83±28 s total). No significant differences were found with qualitative image scores for blood-myocardial contrast, edge definition, and presence of artifact. No significant differences were found in volumetric analysis between the two sequences. The number of breath-holds was 10±4 for conventional imaging and 5±3 for compressed sensing.
Compressed sensing allowed for a 50% reduction in the number of breath-holds and a 43% reduction in the total scan time without differences in the qualitative or quantitative measurements as compared to the conventional technique.
传统的儿科容积 MRI 采集短轴堆栈通常需要在麻醉下进行多次屏气。
本研究旨在验证一种供应商优化的压缩感知方法,以减少短轴平衡稳态自由进动(bSSFP)电影成像过程中的扫描时间。
在这项研究中,我们在一台商用 3 特斯拉(T)扫描仪上对 28 名患者(16±9 岁)进行了成像,使用回顾性心电图门控 bSSFP 电影采集。使用常规并行成像和供应商优化的并行成像/压缩感知方法采集覆盖两个心室的短轴电影图像。两位有经验的放射科医生对血液-心肌对比度、边缘定义和伪影的存在进行了定性 Likert 评分。进行了定量比较,包括双心室大小和功能。使用配对 t 检验检测显著差异(P<0.05)。
常规成像的扫描时间为 7±2 秒/层(147±33 秒总时间),而压缩感知的扫描时间为 4±2 秒/层(83±28 秒总时间)。在血液-心肌对比度、边缘定义和伪影的存在方面,两种成像方法的定性图像评分没有显著差异。两种序列的容积分析无显著差异。常规成像的屏气次数为 10±4 次,压缩感知为 5±3 次。
与传统技术相比,压缩感知可减少 50%的屏气次数和 43%的总扫描时间,而在定性和定量测量方面没有差异。