Suppr超能文献

评估多元化种植系统的农业生态和社会文化效益的非市场价值。

Evaluating Non-Market Values of Agroecological and Socio-Cultural Benefits of Diversified Cropping Systems.

机构信息

Natural Resources Institute Finland, PL 2, 00791, Helsinki, Finland.

Natural Resources Institute Finland, Tietotie 4, 31600, Jokioinen, Finland.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2021 May;67(5):988-999. doi: 10.1007/s00267-021-01437-2. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

Abstract

We explored how consumers value the ecological and socio-cultural benefits of diversified food production systems in Finland. We used a stated preference method and contingent valuation to quantify consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for the benefits of increased farm and regional scale diversity of cultivation practices and crop rotations. Three valuation scenarios were presented to a representative sample of consumers: the first one focused on agroecosystem services on cropland, the second on wider socio-cultural effects and the third was a combination of them. The results suggest that consumers are willing to pay on the average €228 per household annually for the suggested diversification. This is equal to €245 per hectare of cultivated cropland. The results also indicate that 21% of consumers were not willing to pay anything to support more diverse cropping systems. The relatively high WTP for both agroecological and socio-cultural benefits provide important messages for actors in the food chain and for policy makers on future targeting of economic resources within agri-environmental schemes.

摘要

我们探讨了消费者如何重视多元化食品生产系统在芬兰的生态和社会文化效益。我们使用了陈述偏好法和条件价值评估法来量化消费者对增加农场和区域种植实践和轮作多样性的效益的支付意愿(WTP)。向具有代表性的消费者样本呈现了三个估值情景:第一个情景侧重于农田的农业生态系统服务,第二个情景侧重于更广泛的社会文化影响,第三个情景则是它们的组合。研究结果表明,消费者平均愿意每年每户支付 228 欧元,以支持所建议的多样化。这相当于每公顷耕地 245 欧元。研究结果还表明,21%的消费者不愿意支付任何费用来支持更多样化的种植系统。对农业生态和社会文化效益的较高支付意愿为食物链中的参与者和农业环境计划中的政策制定者提供了重要信息,以便在未来针对经济资源进行目标定位。

相似文献

5
First adaptation of quinoa in the Bhutanese mountain agriculture systems.藜麦在不丹山地农业系统中的首次应用。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 16;15(1):e0219804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219804. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

2
Dairy intensification: Drivers, impacts and alternatives.乳业集约化:驱动力、影响因素及替代方案。
Ambio. 2020 Jan;49(1):35-48. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01177-y. Epub 2019 May 4.
3
Abating N in Nordic agriculture - Policy, measures and way forward.减少北欧农业中的氮 - 政策、措施和未来方向。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Apr 15;236:674-686. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.143. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
8
Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture.全球粮食需求与农业可持续集约化发展。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 13;108(50):20260-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116437108. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
9
Global consequences of land use.土地利用的全球影响。
Science. 2005 Jul 22;309(5734):570-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1111772.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验