• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管癌条件总生存率的趋势:一项基于人群的研究。

Trends in conditional overall survival of esophageal cancer: a population-based study.

作者信息

Deng Wei, Yu Rong, Yang Zhao, Dong Xin, Wang Weihu

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China.

School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Sassoon Road, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(2):102. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-2798.

DOI:10.21037/atm-20-2798
PMID:33569404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7867868/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to investigate the causes of death in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) and report reliable and accurate estimates of adjusted conditional overall survival (COS).

METHODS

We retrieved data on patients aged 18 years or older who were diagnosed with EC between 1975 and 2016 from the Surveillance Epidemiology End Results (SEER) registry. We estimated COS by using an inverse probability weighting method to adjust for the available covariates. Linear trends were analyzed via a weighted linear regression.

RESULTS

A total of 40,142 confirmed patients were included in the final analysis. Of these, 20,971 were diagnosed with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and 19,171 were diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma. EC was the leading cause of death, followed by heart disease (5.2%), stomach cancer (3.2%), and other diseases (2.9%). Five-year adjusted COS, given that patients had already survived 36 months was improved from 0.50 to 0.87 (P<0.001) in comparison with the 5-year conventional overall survival. As the survival time increased from 0 to 48 months, the 5-year adjusted COS improved significantly. The adjusted conditional EC-specific survival also showed similar trends.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with EC who had survived over time, the 5-year adjusted COS and the conditional EC-specific survival improved dramatically. Other causes of death in EC patients should also be considered.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在调查食管癌(EC)患者的死亡原因,并报告调整后的条件总体生存率(COS)的可靠准确估计值。

方法

我们从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)登记处检索了1975年至2016年间诊断为EC的18岁及以上患者的数据。我们使用逆概率加权法估计COS,以调整可用的协变量。通过加权线性回归分析线性趋势。

结果

共有40142例确诊患者纳入最终分析。其中,20971例被诊断为食管鳞状细胞癌,19171例被诊断为食管腺癌。EC是主要死因,其次是心脏病(5.2%)、胃癌(3.2%)和其他疾病(2.9%)。与5年传统总生存率相比,患者已存活36个月时的5年调整后COS从0.50提高到0.87(P<0.001)。随着生存时间从0增加到48个月,5年调整后COS显著提高。调整后的条件EC特异性生存率也显示出类似趋势。

结论

对于长期存活的EC患者,5年调整后COS和条件EC特异性生存率显著提高。还应考虑EC患者的其他死亡原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5094/7867868/73ee7de97aea/atm-09-02-102-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5094/7867868/1e95db69ddf2/atm-09-02-102-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5094/7867868/7915918debe6/atm-09-02-102-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5094/7867868/c50c5421a508/atm-09-02-102-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5094/7867868/73ee7de97aea/atm-09-02-102-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5094/7867868/1e95db69ddf2/atm-09-02-102-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5094/7867868/7915918debe6/atm-09-02-102-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5094/7867868/c50c5421a508/atm-09-02-102-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5094/7867868/73ee7de97aea/atm-09-02-102-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Trends in conditional overall survival of esophageal cancer: a population-based study.食管癌条件总生存率的趋势:一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(2):102. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-2798.
2
Conditional survival in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer after receiving various treatment modalities.不同治疗方式后食管或胃食管交界部癌患者的条件生存。
Cancer Med. 2021 Jan;10(2):659-674. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3651. Epub 2020 Dec 12.
3
Conditional survival and annual hazard of death in older patients with esophageal cancer receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy.接受根治性放化疗的老年食管癌患者的条件生存和年死亡风险。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Apr 17;24(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04939-w.
4
Conditional Survival of Esophageal Cancer: An Analysis from the SEER Registry (1988-2011).食管癌的条件生存:基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库(1988 - 2011年)的分析
J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Oct;10(10):1490-7. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000649.
5
Comparison of endoscopic therapies and surgical resection in patients with early esophageal cancer: a population-based study.内镜治疗与手术切除治疗早期食管癌患者的比较:基于人群的研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Feb;79(2):224-232.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
6
Conditional survival among patients with carcinoma of the lung.肺癌患者的条件生存情况。
Chest. 1999 Sep;116(3):697-703. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.3.697.
7
A National Study of Survival Trends and Conditional Survival in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Analysis of the National Population-Based Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Registry.一项关于鼻咽癌生存趋势和条件生存的全国性研究:国家人群为基础的监测、流行病学和最终结果登记处的分析。
Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Apr;50(2):324-334. doi: 10.4143/crt.2016.544. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
8
Trends in the incidence and survival of patients with esophageal cancer: A SEER database analysis.食管癌发病率和生存率的趋势:SEER 数据库分析。
Thorac Cancer. 2020 May;11(5):1121-1128. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13311. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
9
Trends in esophageal cancer survival in United States adults from 1973 to 2009: A SEER database analysis.1973年至2009年美国成年人食管癌生存率趋势:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库分析
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jun;31(6):1141-6. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13289.
10
Radiation modality use and cardiopulmonary mortality risk in elderly patients with esophageal cancer.老年食管癌患者的放疗方式使用与心肺死亡风险
Cancer. 2016 Mar 15;122(6):917-28. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29857. Epub 2015 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic estimates of survival in patients with follicular thyroid cancer: a retrospective cohort study.滤泡性甲状腺癌患者生存情况的动态评估:一项回顾性队列研究。
Endocrine. 2025 Feb;87(2):627-634. doi: 10.1007/s12020-024-04010-z. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
2
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Relationship between Statin Intake and Esophageal Cancer.他汀类药物摄入与食管癌关系的系统评价和荟萃分析
Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2024;24(14):1029-1037. doi: 10.2174/0118715206292712240522043350.
3
Development and validation of a nomogram to predict cardiac death after radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in survival based on treatment modality for esophageal cancer: a population-based study.基于治疗方式的食管癌生存趋势:一项基于人群的研究。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Oct;31(10):1192-1199. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001498.
2
Survival of Esophageal Cancer in China: A Pooled Analysis on Hospital-Based Studies From 2000 to 2018.中国食管癌的生存率:基于2000年至2018年医院研究的汇总分析
Front Oncol. 2019 Jun 27;9:548. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00548. eCollection 2019.
3
Oesophageal cancer: risks, prevention, and diagnosis.
预测食管癌放疗后心脏死亡的列线图的开发与验证
Cancer Innov. 2023 Sep 1;2(5):391-404. doi: 10.1002/cai2.89. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Development and Validation of a Nomogram Model for the Risk of Cardiac Death in Patients Treated with Chemotherapy for Esophageal Cancer.开发和验证用于接受化疗治疗食管癌患者心脏死亡风险的列线图模型。
Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2023 Dec;23(11-12):377-387. doi: 10.1007/s12012-023-09807-4. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
5
Assessment of the Relationship Between Gastric-Acid Suppressants and the Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.胃酸抑制剂与食管腺癌风险之间关系的评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2023 Jan 25;98:100692. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2023.100692. eCollection 2023.
6
What Causes Death in Esophageal Cancer Patients Other Than the Cancer Itself: A Large Population-Based Analysis.食管癌患者中除癌症本身外导致死亡的原因:一项基于大规模人群的分析。
J Cancer. 2022 Oct 17;13(13):3485-3494. doi: 10.7150/jca.78004. eCollection 2022.
7
Age-Related Sex Disparities in Esophageal Cancer Survival: A Population-Based Study in the United States.年龄相关的食管癌生存性别差异:美国的一项基于人群的研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 12;10:836914. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.836914. eCollection 2022.
8
Prognostic variables for conditional survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent minimally invasive surgery.微创治疗食管鳞癌患者条件生存的预后变量。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 26;22(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09423-5.
9
Predictive Model for Overall Survival and Cancer-Specific Survival in Patients with Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.食管腺癌患者总生存期和癌症特异性生存期的预测模型
J Oncol. 2021 Sep 14;2021:4138575. doi: 10.1155/2021/4138575. eCollection 2021.
食管癌:风险、预防与诊断。
BMJ. 2019 Jul 9;366:l4373. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4373.
4
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
5
Prognosis of oesophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma following surgery and no surgery in a nationwide Swedish cohort study.瑞典一项全国性队列研究中,手术与非手术治疗后食管腺癌和鳞状细胞癌的预后情况。
BMJ Open. 2018 May 10;8(5):e021495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021495.
6
Effects of Nutrition Intervention on Total and Cancer Mortality: 25-Year Post-trial Follow-up of the 5.25-Year Linxian Nutrition Intervention Trial.营养干预对总死亡率和癌症死亡率的影响:林县营养干预试验 5.25 年随访 25 年后的结果
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Nov 1;110(11):1229-1238. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy043.
7
Cause of death in patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer in Sweden: a population-based study.瑞典食管癌确诊患者的死因:一项基于人群的研究。
Oncotarget. 2017 Feb 11;8(31):51800-51809. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15270. eCollection 2017 Aug 1.
8
Racial disparities in cancer-related survival in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus in the US between 1973 and 2013.1973年至2013年间美国食管鳞状细胞癌患者癌症相关生存率的种族差异。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 23;12(8):e0183782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183782. eCollection 2017.
9
An update of the WCRF/AICR systematic literature review and meta-analysis on dietary and anthropometric factors and esophageal cancer risk.世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究所饮食和人体测量因素与食管癌风险的系统文献综述和荟萃分析更新。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;28(10):2409-2419. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx338.
10
Competing risk bias was common in a prominent medical journal.竞争风险偏倚在一本著名医学期刊中很常见。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;80:135-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Aug 1.