Tian Lu, Guo Ya-Tu, Ying Ming, Liu Yang-Chen, Li Xuan, Wang Yan
Clinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Eye Institute, Tianjin Key Lab of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(2):110. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-5433.
Form deprivation myopia is a type of ametropia, with identifiable causes in humans, that has been induced in many animals. The age of onset of myopia induced by monocular form deprivation coincides with the period of visual development in guinea pigs. However, visual acuity of form-deprived eyes in guinea pigs is not understood yet. In this study, we investigated whether monocular form deprivation would affect visual acuity in infant guinea pigs by evaluating the development of myopia and amblyopia after monocular form deprivation, and whether form deprivation myopia and amblyopia occurred simultaneously or successively.
Twenty pigmented guinea pigs (2 weeks old) were randomly assigned to two groups: monocularly form-deprived (n=10), in which facemasks modified from latex balloons covered the right eye, and normal controls (n=10). Refraction, axial length, and visual acuity were measured at 4 intervals (after 0, 1, 4, and 8 weeks of form deprivation), using cycloplegic streak retinoscopy, A-scan ultrasonography (with an oscillation frequency of 10 MHz), and sweep visual evoked potentials (sweep VEPs), respectively. Sweep VEPs were performed with correction of the induced myopic refractive error.
Longer deprivation periods resulted in significant refractive errors in form-deprived eyes compared with those in contralateral and normal control eyes; the axial lengths of form-deprived eyes increased significantly after 4 and 8 weeks of form deprivation. These results revealed that myopia was established at 4 weeks. The acuity of form-deprived eyes was unchanged compared to that at the pretreatment time point, while that of contralateral eyes and eyes in normal control guinea pigs improved; there were significant differences between the deprived eyes and the other two open eyes from 1 to 8 weeks of form deprivation, showing that amblyopia was possibly established during 1 week of form deprivation.
This study demonstrated the feasibility of using sweep VEPs to estimate the visual acuity of guinea pigs. Further, our results revealed that amblyopia likely occurred earlier than myopia; amblyopia and myopia coexisted after a long duration of monocular form deprivation in guinea pigs. Understanding this relationship may help provide insights into failures of treatment of amblyopia associated with myopic anisometropia.
形觉剥夺性近视是一种屈光不正,在人类中有明确的病因,并且已在许多动物中诱发。单眼形觉剥夺诱发近视的发病年龄与豚鼠的视觉发育时期相吻合。然而,豚鼠形觉剥夺眼的视力情况尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们通过评估单眼形觉剥夺后近视和弱视的发展情况,来研究单眼形觉剥夺是否会影响幼龄豚鼠的视力,以及形觉剥夺性近视和弱视是同时发生还是相继发生。
将20只有色豚鼠(2周龄)随机分为两组:单眼形觉剥夺组(n = 10),用由乳胶气球改制的面罩遮盖右眼;正常对照组(n = 10)。分别在形觉剥夺0、1、4和8周后这4个时间点,使用睫状肌麻痹带状检影法、A超超声检查(振荡频率为10 MHz)和扫描视觉诱发电位(sweep VEPs)测量屈光、眼轴长度和视力。进行扫描视觉诱发电位检查时已矫正诱发的近视屈光不正。
与对侧眼和正常对照眼相比,形觉剥夺时间越长,形觉剥夺眼的屈光不正越明显;形觉剥夺4周和8周后,形觉剥夺眼的眼轴长度显著增加。这些结果表明近视在4周时形成。与预处理时间点相比,形觉剥夺眼的视力没有变化,而对侧眼和正常对照豚鼠的眼视力提高;在形觉剥夺1至8周期间,剥夺眼与另外两只未遮盖眼之间存在显著差异,表明弱视可能在形觉剥夺1周时形成。
本研究证明了使用扫描视觉诱发电位来评估豚鼠视力的可行性。此外,我们的结果显示弱视可能比近视更早发生;在豚鼠长时间单眼形觉剥夺后,弱视和近视并存。了解这种关系可能有助于深入了解与近视性屈光参差相关的弱视治疗失败的原因。