Int J Prosthodont. 2021;34:s63-s84. doi: 10.11607/ijp.7162.
To synthesize evidence derived from systematic reviews (SRs) on different interventions for rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla with implant-supported restorations.
A protocol-oriented search was established to address the PICO question: What is the current evidence regarding rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla with different implant-supported prostheses in terms of implant and prosthesis survival? The primary outcomes were implant and prosthesis survival rates evaluated from SRs of clinical studies including adult patients with complete edentulism of the maxilla and comparing different implant-supported rehabilitation strategies. Methodologic quality of the SRs was assessed with the AMSTAR-2 tool.
The final selection process led to the inclusion of 36 SRs that were grouped as: (1) addressing maxillae with sufficient bone to place implants; (2) addressing maxillae with insufficient bone to place implants; and (3) comparing different types of prosthesis, number of implants, patient-reported outcomes, and economic evaluations. The literature describes four or more implants as suitable for full-arch fixed prostheses and implant-supported overdentures; in both cases, the overall survival rate is > 95%. Mini-implants present very high short-term failure rates (> 30%). Poor description of technical complications, adjustments, and maintenance and corresponding costs precluded a cost-effectiveness analysis.
No implant-supported rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla (fixed or removable) should be supported on fewer than four implants. A one-piece full-arch fixed dental prosthesis can be supported by a minimum of two anterior axial plus two posterior distally tilted implants or by six to eight axial implants symmetrically distributed through the posterior and anterior regions of the arch. Four to six implants is the advised number to support an overdenture. The use of mini-implants in the maxilla is inadvisable.
综合关于不同植入物支持修复体修复无牙上颌的系统评价(SRs)中的证据。
建立了一个以方案为导向的搜索,以解决 PICO 问题:在植入物支持的修复体方面,不同种植体支持的义齿在上颌无牙区的修复方面,目前的证据是什么?主要结果是从包括上颌完全无牙的成年患者的临床研究的 SR 中评估的种植体和修复体存活率,比较不同的种植体支持的康复策略。使用 AMSTAR-2 工具评估 SR 的方法学质量。
最终的选择过程导致纳入了 36 篇 SR,这些 SR 分为以下几类:(1)针对有足够骨量植入种植体的上颌;(2)针对骨量不足植入种植体的上颌;(3)比较不同类型的修复体、种植体数量、患者报告的结果和经济评估。文献描述了四颗或更多种植体适合全口固定义齿和种植体支持的覆盖义齿;在这两种情况下,总存活率>95%。微型种植体的短期失败率非常高(>30%)。由于缺乏对技术并发症、调整、维护和相应成本的详细描述,无法进行成本效益分析。
在上颌无牙区(固定或可摘)的任何植入物支持修复都不应少于四颗种植体。单一口腔全固定修复体可由至少两颗前轴向加两颗后向远中倾斜种植体或六到八颗轴向种植体对称分布在前部和后部区域来支持。建议使用四到六颗种植体来支持覆盖义齿。在上颌使用微型种植体是不可取的。