• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The FAST-FURO study: effect of very early administration of intravenous furosemide in the prehospital setting to patients with acute heart failure attending the emergency department.FAST-FURO 研究:在急诊就诊的急性心力衰竭患者中,院前给予静脉呋塞米非常早期治疗的效果。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 Jun 30;10(5):487-496. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa042.
2
Preventable delays to intravenous furosemide administration in the emergency department prolong hospitalization for patients with acute heart failure.在急诊科,静脉注射呋塞米的可预防延误会延长急性心力衰竭患者的住院时间。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 15;269:207-212. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.087. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
3
Effect of early initiation of noninvasive ventilation in patients transported by emergency medical service for acute heart failure.急诊医疗服务转运的急性心力衰竭患者早期应用无创通气的效果。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 1;31(5):339-346. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001141. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
4
Early intravenous nitroglycerin use in prehospital setting and in the emergency department to treat patients with acute heart failure: Insights from the EAHFE Spanish registry.早期静脉使用硝酸甘油治疗急性心力衰竭患者:来自 EAHFE 西班牙登记处的见解。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Dec 1;344:127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.09.031. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
5
Time-to-Furosemide Treatment and Mortality in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Heart Failure.呋塞米治疗时间与急性心力衰竭住院患者的死亡率。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jun 27;69(25):3042-3051. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.042.
6
Impact of prehospital IV furosemide or nitrate application on hospital outcome in acute heart failure patients.院前静脉推注呋塞米或硝酸盐对急性心力衰竭患者住院结局的影响。
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2022;123(12):859-863. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2022_137.
7
Effect of an Emergency Department Care Bundle on 30-Day Hospital Discharge and Survival Among Elderly Patients With Acute Heart Failure: The ELISABETH Randomized Clinical Trial.急诊护理包对老年急性心力衰竭患者 30 天出院和生存的影响:ELISABETH 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Nov 17;324(19):1948-1956. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.19378.
8
Use of digoxin in the emergency department to treat patients with acute heart failure and its impact on short-term outcomes.在急诊科使用地高辛治疗急性心力衰竭患者及其对短期结局的影响。
Emergencias. 2023 Dec;35(6):437-446. doi: 10.55633/s3me/E08.2023.
9
The Effect of Furosemide Dose Administered in the Out-of-hospital Setting on Renal Function Among Patients with Suspected Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.院外给予呋塞米剂量对疑似急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者肾功能的影响。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Feb;30(1):38-45. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X14001411. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
10
Renal function on admission modifies prognostic impact of diuretics in acute heart failure: a propensity score matched and interaction analysis.入院时的肾功能改变利尿剂在急性心力衰竭中的预后影响:倾向评分匹配及交互分析
Heart Vessels. 2016 Dec;31(12):1980-1987. doi: 10.1007/s00380-016-0817-y. Epub 2016 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Initial Care Pathway in Acute Heart Failure From Home to Hospital.急性心力衰竭从家庭到医院的初始护理路径
Clin Cardiol. 2025 Jun;48(6):e70161. doi: 10.1002/clc.70161.
2
A Comparison of Different Guidelines for the Treatment of Acute Heart Failure and Their Extensibility to Emergency Departments: A Critical Reappraisal.急性心力衰竭治疗不同指南的比较及其在急诊科的可扩展性:一项批判性再评估
J Clin Med. 2025 May 17;14(10):3522. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103522.
3
'Time is prognosis' in heart failure: time-to-treatment initiation as a modifiable risk factor.心力衰竭中的“时间就是预后”:治疗启动时间作为可改变的风险因素。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Dec;8(6):4444-4453. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13646. Epub 2021 Oct 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Worsening renal function during an episode of acute heart failure and its relation to short- and long-term mortality: associated factors in the Epidemiology of Acute Heart Failure in Emergency Departments- Worsening Renal Function study.在急性心力衰竭发作期间肾功能恶化及其与短期和长期死亡率的关系:急诊科急性心力衰竭的流行病学研究-肾功能恶化中的相关因素。
Emergencias. 2020 Sep;32(5):332-339.
2
Prognosis in heart failure: importance of physical frailty at the time of admission.心力衰竭的预后:入院时身体虚弱的重要性。
Emergencias. 2020;32(2):147-148.
3
Evaluation of kidney function throughout the heart failure trajectory - a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.评估心力衰竭进程中的肾功能——欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭协会立场声明。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Apr;22(4):584-603. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1697. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
4
Physical frailty and its impact on long-term outcomes in older patients with acute heart failure after discharge from an emergency department.身体虚弱及其对老年急性心力衰竭患者出院后长期结局的影响。
Emergencias. 2019;31(6):413-416.
5
Pre-hospital management protocols and perceived difficulty in diagnosing acute heart failure.院前管理方案和对急性心力衰竭诊断难度的认知。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Feb;7(1):289-296. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12524. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
6
Patient-initiated emergency department visits without primary care follow-up: frequency and characteristics.患者自行前往急诊科就诊但未进行初级保健随访:频率和特征。
Emergencias. 2019;31(4):234-238.
7
Are we using our emergency services as if they were Google?我们是否在像使用谷歌一样使用我们的紧急服务?
Emergencias. 2019;31(4):225-226.
8
Acute heart failure congestion and perfusion status - impact of the clinical classification on in-hospital and long-term outcomes; insights from the ESC-EORP-HFA Heart Failure Long-Term Registry.急性心力衰竭充血和灌注状态 - 临床分类对住院和长期结局的影响;来自 ESC-EORP-HFA 心力衰竭长期注册研究的见解。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Nov;21(11):1338-1352. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1492. Epub 2019 May 24.
9
Clinical phenotypes of acute heart failure based on signs and symptoms of perfusion and congestion at emergency department presentation and their relationship with patient management and outcomes.基于急诊科就诊时灌注和淤血体征和症状的急性心力衰竭的临床表型及其与患者管理和结局的关系。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Nov;21(11):1353-1365. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1502. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
10
External Validation of the MEESSI Acute Heart Failure Risk Score: A Cohort Study.MEESSI 急性心力衰竭风险评分的外部验证:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Feb 19;170(4):248-256. doi: 10.7326/M18-1967. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

FAST-FURO 研究:在急诊就诊的急性心力衰竭患者中,院前给予静脉呋塞米非常早期治疗的效果。

The FAST-FURO study: effect of very early administration of intravenous furosemide in the prehospital setting to patients with acute heart failure attending the emergency department.

机构信息

Emergency Department, Hospital Clínic, "Emergencies: Processes and Pathologies" Research Group, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

The GREAT (Global REsearch in Acute cardiovascular conditions Team) Network, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 Jun 30;10(5):487-496. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa042.

DOI:10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa042
PMID:33580790
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8245147/
Abstract

AIMS

The effect of early administration of intravenous (IV) furosemide in the emergency department (ED) on short-term outcomes of acute heart failure (AHF) patients remains controversial, with one recent Japanese study reporting a decrease of in-hospital mortality and one Korean study reporting a lack of clinical benefit. Both studies excluded patients receiving prehospital IV furosemide and only included patients requiring hospitalization. To assess the impact on short-term outcomes of early IV furosemide administration by emergency medical services (EMS) before patient arrival to the ED.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a secondary analysis of the Epidemiology of Acute Heart Failure in Emergency Departments (EAHFE) registry of consecutive AHF patients admitted to Spanish EDs, patients treated with IV furosemide at the ED were classified according to whether they received IV furosemide from the EMS (FAST-FURO group) or not (CONTROL group). In-hospital all-cause mortality, 30-day all-cause mortality, and prolonged hospitalization (>10 days) were assessed. We included 12 595 patients (FAST-FURO = 683; CONTROL = 11 912): 968 died during index hospitalization [7.7%; FAST-FURO = 10.3% vs. CONTROL = 7.5%; odds ratio (OR) = 1.403, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.085-1.813; P = 0.009], 1269 died during the first 30 days (10.2%; FAST-FURO = 13.4% vs. CONTROL = 9.9%; OR = 1.403, 95% CI = 1.146-1.764; P = 0.004), and 2844 had prolonged hospitalization (22.8%; FAST-FURO = 25.8% vs. CONTROL = 22.6%; OR = 1.189, 95% CI = 0.995-1.419; P = 0.056). FAST-FURO group patients had more diabetes mellitus, ischaemic cardiomyopathy, peripheral artery disease, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and severe decompensations, and had a better New York Heart Association class and had less atrial fibrillation. After adjusting for these significant differences, early IV furosemide resulted in no impact on short-term outcomes: OR = 1.080 (95% CI = 0.817-1.427) for in-hospital mortality, OR = 1.086 (95% CI = 0.845-1.396) for 30-day mortality, and OR = 1.095 (95% CI = 0.915-1.312) for prolonged hospitalization. Several sensitivity analyses, including analysis of 599 pairs of patients matched by propensity score, showed consistent findings.

CONCLUSION

Early IV furosemide during the prehospital phase was administered to the sickest patients, was not associated with changes in short-term mortality or length of hospitalization after adjustment for several confounders.

摘要

目的

静脉(IV)呋塞米在急诊科(ED)的早期给药对急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者的短期结局的影响仍存在争议,最近的一项日本研究报告称住院死亡率降低,而另一项韩国研究报告称临床获益缺乏。这两项研究均排除了接受院前 IV 呋塞米治疗的患者,且仅纳入需要住院治疗的患者。本研究旨在评估在患者到达 ED 之前,由急救医疗服务(EMS)进行早期 IV 呋塞米给药对短期结局的影响。

方法和结果

在连续纳入的西班牙 ED 收治的 AHF 患者的流行病学急性心力衰竭在急诊部(EAHFE)登记研究的二次分析中,根据患者是否在 ED 接受 IV 呋塞米治疗将患者分为接受 EMS 给予的 IV 呋塞米(FAST-FURO 组)或未接受(CONTROL 组)。评估院内全因死亡率、30 天全因死亡率和延长住院时间(>10 天)。共纳入 12595 例患者(FAST-FURO=683;CONTROL=11912):968 例患者在住院期间死亡[7.7%;FAST-FURO=10.3%比 CONTROL=7.5%;比值比(OR)=1.403,95%置信区间(95%CI)=1.085-1.813;P=0.009],1269 例患者在 30 天内死亡(10.2%;FAST-FURO=13.4%比 CONTROL=9.9%;OR=1.403,95%CI=1.146-1.764;P=0.004),2844 例患者延长住院时间(22.8%;FAST-FURO=25.8%比 CONTROL=22.6%;OR=1.189,95%CI=0.995-1.419;P=0.056)。FAST-FURO 组患者糖尿病、缺血性心肌病、外周动脉疾病、左心室收缩功能障碍和严重失代偿更为常见,纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级较好,心房颤动较少。在调整这些显著差异后,早期 IV 呋塞米给药对短期结局无影响:院内死亡率的 OR=1.080(95%CI=0.817-1.427),30 天死亡率的 OR=1.086(95%CI=0.845-1.396),延长住院时间的 OR=1.095(95%CI=0.915-1.312)。几项敏感性分析,包括对 599 对通过倾向评分匹配的患者进行分析,均得出一致的结果。

结论

在院前阶段给予 IV 呋塞米治疗最病重的患者,在调整了几个混杂因素后,与短期死亡率或住院时间的变化无关。