Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, 141 83, Huddinge, Sweden.
Academic Primary Care Center, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMC Neurol. 2021 Feb 13;21(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02101-2.
Identifying physical activity (PA) profiles of people with Parkinson's Disease (PD) could provide clinically meaningful knowledge concerning how to tailor PA interventions. Our objectives were therefore to i) identify distinct PA profiles in people with PD based on accelerometer data, ii) explore differences between the profiles regarding personal characteristics and physical function.
Accelerometer data from 301 participants (43% women, mean age: 71 years) was analysed using latent profile analyses of 15 derived PA variables. Physical function measurements included balance performance, comfortable gait speed and single and dual-task functional mobility.
Three distinct profiles were identified; "Sedentary" (N = 68), "Light Movers" (N = 115), "Steady Movers" (N = 118). "Sedentary" included people with PD with high absolute and relative time spent in Sedentary behaviour (SB), little time light intensity physical activity (LIPA) and negligible moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). "Light Movers" were people with PD with values close to the mean for all activity variables. "Steady Movers" spent less time in SB during midday, and more time in LIPA and MVPA throughout the day, compared to the other profiles. "Sedentary" people had poorer balance (P = 0.006), poorer functional mobility (P = 0.027) and were more likely to have fallen previously (P = 0.027), compared to "Light Movers. The Timed Up and Go test, an easily performed clinical test of functional mobility, was the only test that could distinguish between all three profiles.
Distinct PA profiles, with clear differences in how the time awake is spent exist among people with mild-moderate PD.
识别帕金森病(PD)患者的体力活动(PA)模式可以提供有关如何定制 PA 干预措施的有临床意义的知识。因此,我们的目的是:i)根据加速度计数据确定 PD 患者的不同 PA 模式;ii)探讨这些模式在个人特征和身体功能方面的差异。
使用 15 个衍生的 PA 变量的潜在剖面分析,对 301 名参与者(43%为女性,平均年龄:71 岁)的加速度计数据进行分析。身体功能测量包括平衡表现、舒适步行速度以及单任务和双任务功能性移动能力。
确定了三个不同的模式;“久坐”(N=68)、“轻度活动者”(N=115)和“稳定活动者”(N=118)。“久坐”模式的 PD 患者,久坐行为(SB)的绝对和相对时间较长,轻强度体力活动(LIPA)和中高强度体力活动(MVPA)时间较短。“轻度活动者”的所有活动变量值接近平均值。与其他模式相比,“稳定活动者”在中午时 SB 时间较少,而在 LIPA 和 MVPA 时间更多。与“轻度活动者”相比,“久坐”者的平衡能力更差(P=0.006),功能性移动能力更差(P=0.027),且跌倒史更常见(P=0.027)。计时起立行走测试(TUGT)是一种易于进行的功能性移动能力临床测试,它是唯一能够区分所有三个模式的测试。
在轻度至中度 PD 患者中,存在明显不同的 PA 模式,清醒时的时间分配方式存在明显差异。