Shaw Kurt, da Silva Rita de Cácia Oenning
Usina da Imaginação, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Front Pediatr. 2021 Jan 27;8:567257. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.567257. eCollection 2020.
The growth of the randomized controlled trial (RCT) as the "gold standard" for evaluation has justly been praised as an advance in the professionalization of social programs and projects, an "adoption of science" - in the words of the Lancet. None the less, the emphasis on the RCT biases funding for projects that distribute private goods and which focus on "low hanging fruit" in health, nutrition, and sanitation, simply because those areas lend themselves to the sort of measurement that works with RCTs. As a result, many project developers in the government and NGO sectors lament that a hegemonic focus on RCTs impedes creativity or new models that challenge traditional paradigms. This case study of CanalCanoa, a community video coaching project for indigenous parents of young children in the Rio Negro region of the Amazon Basin, offers techniques to measure for innovation. Instead of developing a new RCT for an extremely diverse population (27 ethnic groups) where traditional childcare methods are in historical flux because of urbanization, CanalCanoa measured variables shown by previous RCTs to be causally connected with positive development results. By researching the impact of the intervention on nutrition, language (multilingualism, use of traditional songs and stories), and social network expansion, CanalCanoa measured upstream indicators, thus mixing scientific rigor with an opportunity for innovation and providing important insight and reform of a theory of change.
随机对照试验(RCT)作为评估的“黄金标准”不断发展,理所当然地被誉为社会项目专业化进程中的一项进步,用《柳叶刀》的话来说,是一种“科学的采用”。然而,对随机对照试验的强调使那些分配私人物品且专注于健康、营养和卫生领域中“低垂果实”的项目获得的资金产生了偏差,仅仅是因为这些领域适合采用随机对照试验所适用的那种测量方法。结果,政府部门和非政府组织部门的许多项目开发者哀叹,对随机对照试验的霸权式关注阻碍了挑战传统范式的创造力或新模式。这个关于CanalCanoa的案例研究,这是一个为亚马逊盆地里奥内格罗地区幼儿的土著父母开展的社区视频辅导项目,提供了衡量创新的方法。由于城市化,传统育儿方法处于历史变迁之中,对于一个极其多样化的人群(27个民族),CanalCanoa没有开发新的随机对照试验,而是测量了先前随机对照试验表明与积极发展成果有因果关系的变量。通过研究干预措施对营养、语言(多语言、传统歌曲和故事的使用)以及社交网络扩展的影响,CanalCanoa测量了上游指标,从而将科学严谨性与创新机会相结合,并为变革理论提供了重要的见解和改革。