• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于使用200微升定量泵给药的舌下含服免疫治疗水性制剂的全国性回顾性非干预性研究。

A Retrospective Nationwide Non-Interventional Study of an Aqueous Sublingual Immunotherapy Formulation Administered with a 200-µL Dosing Pump.

作者信息

Roger Reig Albert, Padró Casas Clara, Gutiérrez Fernández Diego, Orta Cuevas José Carlos, Sánchez López Germán, Corzo Higueras José Luis

机构信息

Allergy Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Carretera de Canyet, s/n, 08916, Badalona, Spain.

Servicio Neumologia-Alergia, Hospital Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain.

出版信息

Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2021 Jun;8(2):241-251. doi: 10.1007/s40801-021-00233-y. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1007/s40801-021-00233-y
PMID:33591547
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8128946/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Convenient dosing is a key component of treatment adherence and thus efficacy and safety. Aqueous sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) formulations can be administered with a dosing pump that delivers 200 µL of volume per actuation.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to describe the use of Staloral 300 Rapid in its new dosing pump presentation and to evaluate the safety and satisfaction from both the patient and doctor.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective non-interventional study in a population (aged 5 years or over) of individuals with allergic rhinitis or allergic asthma who were being treated with aqueous 300 index of reactivity SLIT formulations of various allergens (grass pollen, tree pollen, house dust mites). Based on a detailed, SLIT-specific, patient self-questionnaire (Quartis) and the inspection of medical records, we assessed the characteristics of the SLIT, safety, patient satisfaction and willingness to continue SLIT. The physician's satisfaction with the treatment was measured on a 0-100 visual analogue scale. Adverse events were coded with the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities.

RESULTS

A total of 801 valid patients were included (52.4% male; mean ± standard deviation age: 25.9 ± 17.2 years; mean time since diagnosis: 4.56 ± 4.68 years; mean time using the previous dosing pump: 19.2 ± 13.0 months; time using the 200-µL dosing pump: 14.95 ± 3.80 months). Among the study population, 317 subjects comprised the paediatric subgroup (57%: male; mean age: 9.8 ± 2.5 years). Overall, 54 patients (6.7%) reported a total of 68 adverse events (including 51 gastrointestinal adverse events). The large majority of adverse events were mild, local and transient and did not require treatment. There were no severe adverse events. The level of patient satisfaction with the ease of SLIT administration was high (84.3% overall, and 82.6% in the paediatric subgroup). The mean ± standard deviation visual analogue scale score for physician satisfaction with the treatment was 70.6 ± 25.1 out of 100.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of 300 index of reactivity SLIT with a 200-µL dosing pump is safe, well tolerated and associated with good levels of patient satisfaction.

摘要

背景

方便给药是治疗依从性的关键组成部分,进而关乎疗效和安全性。舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)水性制剂可通过给药泵给药,每次按压可输送200微升药液。

目的

本研究旨在描述新型给药泵包装的Staloral 300 Rapid的使用情况,并评估患者和医生的安全性及满意度。

患者与方法

我们对一组年龄在5岁及以上、患有过敏性鼻炎或过敏性哮喘且正在接受多种过敏原(草花粉、树花粉、屋尘螨)300反应指数的SLIT水性制剂治疗的人群进行了一项回顾性非干预性研究。基于一份详细的、针对SLIT的患者自我问卷(Quartis)以及病历检查,我们评估了SLIT的特点、安全性、患者满意度以及继续接受SLIT治疗的意愿。医生对治疗的满意度采用0至100的视觉模拟量表进行测量。不良事件使用《药物监管活动医学词典》进行编码。

结果

共纳入801例有效患者(男性占52.4%;平均年龄±标准差:25.9±17.2岁;自诊断以来的平均时间:4.56±4.68年;使用前一种给药泵的平均时间:19.2±13.0个月;使用200微升给药泵的时间:14.95±3.80个月)。在研究人群中,317名受试者组成儿童亚组(男性占57%;平均年龄:9.8±2.5岁)。总体而言,54例患者(6.7%)共报告了68起不良事件(包括51起胃肠道不良事件)。绝大多数不良事件为轻度、局部性且短暂性,无需治疗。未发生严重不良事件。患者对SLIT给药便利性的满意度较高(总体为84.3%,儿童亚组为82.6%)。医生对治疗满意度的视觉模拟量表平均得分±标准差为70.6±25.1(满分100分)。

结论

使用200微升给药泵给予300反应指数的SLIT是安全的,耐受性良好,且患者满意度较高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d3c/8128946/7129df76aa06/40801_2021_233_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d3c/8128946/7129df76aa06/40801_2021_233_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d3c/8128946/7129df76aa06/40801_2021_233_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A Retrospective Nationwide Non-Interventional Study of an Aqueous Sublingual Immunotherapy Formulation Administered with a 200-µL Dosing Pump.一项关于使用200微升定量泵给药的舌下含服免疫治疗水性制剂的全国性回顾性非干预性研究。
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2021 Jun;8(2):241-251. doi: 10.1007/s40801-021-00233-y. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
2
Comparative analysis of sublingual immunotherapy medicines for adherence and clinical outcomes.舌下免疫治疗药物的依从性和临床结局的比较分析。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jan;277(1):135-140. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05656-6. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
3
The MaDo real-life study of dose adjustment of allergen immunotherapy liquid formulations in an indication of respiratory allergic disease: Reasons, practices, and outcomes.MaDo关于变应原免疫治疗液体制剂剂量调整在呼吸道变应性疾病适应症中的真实世界研究:原因、实践与结果
Front Allergy. 2022 Aug 9;3:971155. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2022.971155. eCollection 2022.
4
Treatment Satisfaction During Sublingual Immunotherapy with a Five-Grass Pollen Tablet for Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis: A Prospective, Non-Interventional Study.五草花粉片舌下免疫治疗变应性鼻结膜炎的治疗满意度:一项前瞻性非干预性研究
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2017 Jun;4(2):109-117. doi: 10.1007/s40801-017-0109-6.
5
Tolerability of the SQ-standardised grass sublingual immunotherapy tablet in patients treated with concomitant allergy immunotherapy: a non-interventional observational study.皮下标准化草花粉舌下免疫治疗片在接受联合变应性免疫治疗患者中的耐受性:一项非干预性观察研究。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2016 Mar 8;6:9. doi: 10.1186/s13601-016-0097-8. eCollection 2015.
6
The global development and clinical efficacy of sublingual tablet immunotherapy for allergic diseases.舌下片剂免疫疗法治疗过敏性疾病的全球发展与临床疗效。
Allergol Int. 2018 Jul;67(3):301-308. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 May 16.
7
Choosing the optimal dose in sublingual immunotherapy: Rationale for the 300 index of reactivity dose.选择舌下免疫疗法的最佳剂量:反应性剂量300指数的理论依据。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2015 Dec 23;5:44. doi: 10.1186/s13601-015-0088-1. eCollection 2015.
8
Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT)--indications, mechanism, and efficacy: Position paper prepared by the Section of Immunotherapy, Polish Society of Allergy.舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)——适应症、机制及疗效:由波兰过敏学会免疫疗法分会编写的立场文件
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2016 Mar 23;23(1):44-53. doi: 10.5604/12321966.1196851.
9
Efficacy of sublingual specific immunotherapy in patients with respiratory allergy to Alternaria alternata: a randomised, assessor-blinded, patient-reported outcome, controlled 3-year trial.舌下特异性免疫治疗对Alternaria alternata 呼吸过敏患者的疗效:一项随机、评估者盲法、患者报告结局、对照的 3 年试验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Dec;26(12):2801-6. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.532201. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
10
Sublingual-oral administration of standardized allergenic extracts: phase 1 safety and dosing results.标准化变应原提取物的舌下-口服给药:1期安全性和剂量结果。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 May;100(5):475-81. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60474-7.

引用本文的文献

1
5-grass-pollen SLIT effectiveness in seasonal allergic rhinitis: Impact of sensitization to subtropical grass pollen.5种草花粉舌下特异性免疫治疗对季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效:对亚热带草花粉致敏的影响
World Allergy Organ J. 2022 Feb 23;15(2):100632. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100632. eCollection 2022 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Reduced work/academic performance and quality of life in patients with allergic rhinitis and impact of allergen immunotherapy.过敏性鼻炎患者工作/学业表现及生活质量下降以及变应原免疫治疗的影响
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2016 Aug 11;12:40. doi: 10.1186/s13223-016-0146-9. eCollection 2016.
2
Comprehensive Study of Patients' Compliance with Sublingual Immunotherapy in House Dust Mite Perennial Allergic Rhinitis.尘螨性常年性变应性鼻炎患者舌下免疫治疗依从性的综合研究
Adv Ther. 2016 Jul;33(7):1199-214. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0347-0. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
3
Choosing the optimal dose in sublingual immunotherapy: Rationale for the 300 index of reactivity dose.
选择舌下免疫疗法的最佳剂量:反应性剂量300指数的理论依据。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2015 Dec 23;5:44. doi: 10.1186/s13601-015-0088-1. eCollection 2015.
4
Efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy in children.儿童舌下免疫疗法的疗效与安全性
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2016;12(1):49-56. doi: 10.1586/1744666X.2016.1102058. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
5
Patient selection for subcutaneous versus sublingual immunotherapy.皮下免疫疗法与舌下免疫疗法的患者选择
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Dec;15(6):588-95. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000219.
6
House dust mite sublingual immunotherapy is safe in patients with mild-to-moderate, persistent asthma: a clinical trial.屋尘螨舌下免疫治疗在轻中度持续性哮喘患者中是安全的:一项临床试验。
Allergy. 2016 Feb;71(2):249-57. doi: 10.1111/all.12791. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
7
International consensus on allergy immunotherapy.过敏免疫治疗的国际共识。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Sep;136(3):556-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.04.047. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
8
Safety and tolerability of 5-grass pollen tablet sublingual immunotherapy: pooled analysis and clinical review.5种草花粉片剂舌下免疫疗法的安全性和耐受性:汇总分析与临床综述
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015 May;14(5):777-88. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2015.1017468. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
9
SLIT: indications, follow-up, and management.SLIT:适应证、随访和管理。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2014;24 Suppl 1:1-35.
10
Sublingual immunotherapy: World Allergy Organization position paper 2013 update.舌下免疫治疗:世界过敏组织 2013 年立场文件更新。
World Allergy Organ J. 2014 Mar 28;7(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1939-4551-7-6.