Gordon S
Department of Human Movement and Recreation Studies, University of Western Australia, Nedlands.
Can J Sport Sci. 1988 Mar;13(1):56-65.
The Normative Model for Decision Styles in Coaching (Chelladurai and Haggerty, 1978) was empirically tested using Canadian Intercollegiate (CIAU) soccer teams. The subsequent utility of the model's prescriptions for optimizing decision styles of soccer coaches was seriously questioned. Only 33% agreement was found with the model's prescriptions for both CIAU coaches and their athletes. Neither coaches nor athletes were particularly inclined to use delegation in decision making. Athletes, more than their coaches, preferred consultative styles. In support of research findings from business and industrial settings, there was evidence to suggest that high congruence scores between a coach's decision styles and those preferred and perceived by athletes, could predict athlete perceptions of coaching effectiveness.
教练决策风格的规范模型（切拉杜拉伊和哈格蒂，1978年）通过加拿大大学体育协会（CIAU）的足球队进行了实证检验。该模型关于优化足球教练决策风格的建议的后续效用受到了严重质疑。对于CIAU教练及其运动员，该模型建议的认可度仅为33%。教练和运动员在决策时都不太倾向于采用授权方式。与教练相比，运动员更喜欢协商式风格。为支持来自商业和工业环境的研究结果，有证据表明，教练的决策风格与运动员偏好和感知的决策风格之间的高一致性得分，可以预测运动员对教练有效性的感知。
