Rode Sigmar de Mello, Sato Tabata do Prado, Matos Felipe de Souza, Correia Ayla Macyelle de Oliveira, Camargo Samira Esteves Afonso
Universidade Estadual Paulista - Unesp, Institute of Science and Technology , Department of Dental Materials , São José dos Campos , SP , Brazil .
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia - UFU, School of Dentistry , Postgraduate Program in Dentistry , Uberlândia , MG , Brazil .
Braz Oral Res. 2021 Feb 12;35:e025. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0025. eCollection 2021.
This in vitro study evaluated the biocompatibility and abrasivity of whitening and conventional toothpastes. Samples of conventional (non-whitening) - Edel White Infant (EWI) - and whitening toothpastes - Edel White Whitening (EWW), Edel White CAREFORTE (EWC), Colgate Total 12 Ò Professional (C), and Oral-B Whitening (OB) - were dissolved in culture medium (0.2 g sample weight per mL). Human gingival fibroblasts (hGF) were placed in contact with different dilutions of culture media that had been previously exposed to these toothpastes. Cytotoxicity was then assessed using the methyl tetrazolium test (MTT) and the cell survival rate was determined. Genotoxicity was assessed by the micronucleus test (MNT) and the number of micronuclei was determined before and after exposure to the toothpaste solutions. The enamel surface roughness was evaluated in specimens of bovine teeth (n = 10 per group) before and after 10,000 brushing cycles, using the investigated toothpastes. The results were statistically analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test and two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). According to the MTT assay, EWW and OB presented significant cytotoxicity (p < 0.01), but no genotoxic (MNT) effects (p > 0.05). C toothpaste was statistically significantly abrasive to the enamel surface (p < 0.01). The findings of this study may be helpful for individualized selection of commercial toothpastes, as some whitening toothpastes present significant cytotoxicity and conventional toothpaste cause significant surface changes.
这项体外研究评估了美白牙膏和传统牙膏的生物相容性及磨损性。选取传统(非美白)牙膏——爱德美白婴儿牙膏(EWI),以及美白牙膏——爱德美白牙膏(EWW)、爱德美白关爱特护牙膏(EWC)、高露洁全效12专业牙膏(C)和欧乐-B美白牙膏(OB),将其溶解于培养基中(每毫升培养基中加入0.2克牙膏样品)。将人牙龈成纤维细胞(hGF)与先前接触过这些牙膏的不同稀释度培养基接触。然后使用甲基噻唑基四氮唑试验(MTT)评估细胞毒性,并测定细胞存活率。通过微核试验(MNT)评估遗传毒性,在接触牙膏溶液前后测定微核数量。使用受试牙膏对牛牙样本(每组10个)在进行10000次刷牙循环前后的牙釉质表面粗糙度进行评估。使用曼-惠特尼U检验和双向方差分析对结果进行统计学分析(p < 0.05)。根据MTT分析,EWW和OB表现出显著的细胞毒性(p < 0.01),但无遗传毒性(MNT)效应(p > 0.05)。C牙膏对牙釉质表面具有统计学意义上的显著磨损性(p < 0.01)。本研究结果可能有助于个性化选择商用牙膏,因为一些美白牙膏具有显著的细胞毒性,而传统牙膏会导致显著的表面变化。