Yi So-Yun, Steffen Lyn M, Lutsey Pamela L, Cushman Mary, Folsom Aaron R
University of Minnesota School of Public Health; Minneapolis.
University of Minnesota School of Public Health; Minneapolis.
Am J Med. 2021 Jun;134(6):763-768.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.01.016. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
Published studies are inconsistent about whether differences in diet are associated with risk of venous thromboembolism. We studied the association between dietary patterns and incident venous thromboembolism in a large US cohort.
The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study followed 14,818 middle-aged males and females for incident venous thromboembolism over an average of 22 years between 1987 and 2015. Trained interviewers assessed dietary intake at visits 1 and 3, using a food frequency questionnaire. We derived 2 dietary pattern scores using principal component analysis and ascertained and verified hospitalized venous thromboembolism. In separate proportional hazards regression analyses, we examined associations of quintiles of the prudent and the Western dietary pattern scores with risk of developing non-cancer-related and total venous thromboembolism, adjusting for demographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, body mass index, and diabetes.
With 860 total incident venous thromboembolism events, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of incident non-cancer-related venous thromboembolism (n = 631) across quintiles of the prudent dietary pattern score were 1 (reference), 1.04 (0.81-1.32), 0.84 (0.65-1.08), 0.70 (0.53-0.91), and 0.88 (0.67-1.15), P = .04. Across quintiles of the Western dietary pattern score, hazard ratios of non-cancer-related venous thromboembolism were 1 (reference), 1.13 (0.87-1.45), 1.20 (0.92-1.56), 1.03 (0.77-1.39), and 1.58 (1.13-2.21), P = .04. Associations were similar for total venous thromboembolism.
In this community-based cohort, a prudent dietary pattern was associated with a lower risk of future venous thromboembolism, whereas a Western dietary pattern was associated with a higher risk.
关于饮食差异是否与静脉血栓栓塞风险相关,已发表的研究结果并不一致。我们在美国一个大型队列中研究了饮食模式与新发静脉血栓栓塞之间的关联。
社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究在1987年至2015年期间,对14818名中年男性和女性进行了平均22年的随访,以观察新发静脉血栓栓塞情况。经过培训的访员在第1次和第3次访视时,使用食物频率问卷评估饮食摄入量。我们使用主成分分析得出2种饮食模式得分,并确定和核实住院的静脉血栓栓塞情况。在单独的比例风险回归分析中,我们检查了谨慎饮食模式得分和西方饮食模式得分的五分位数与发生非癌症相关和总体静脉血栓栓塞风险的关联,并对人口统计学特征、生活方式因素、体重指数和糖尿病进行了调整。
在总共860例新发静脉血栓栓塞事件中,谨慎饮食模式得分五分位数的非癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞(n = 631)的风险比(95%置信区间)分别为1(参考值)、1.04(0.81 - 1.32)、0.84(0.65 - 1.08)、0.70(0.53 - 0.91)和0.88(0.67 - 1.15),P = 0.04。在西方饮食模式得分五分位数中,非癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞的风险比分别为1(参考值)、1.13(0.87 - 1.45)、1.20(0.92 - 1.56)、1.03(0.77 - 1.39)和1.58(1.13 - 2.21),P = 0.04。总体静脉血栓栓塞的关联相似。
在这个基于社区的队列中,谨慎的饮食模式与未来静脉血栓栓塞风险较低相关,而西方饮食模式与较高风险相关。