• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口咽和喉部手术期间不同手术方式产生气溶胶的差异。

Variation in aerosol generation by surgical modality during oropharyngeal and laryngeal surgery.

作者信息

Sithole S P, Kuhn W, Sibiya L A

机构信息

University of KwaZulu-Natal, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine Durban South Africa.

出版信息

Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024 Jun 4;9(3):e1287. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1287. eCollection 2024 Jun.

DOI:10.1002/lio2.1287
PMID:38835334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11149762/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to determine the surgical modality with the lowest aerosol and droplets generated by commonly used modalities in oropharyngeal and laryngeal surgery.

METHODS

A simulation of oropharyngeal and laryngeal surgery was set up using fresh sheep heads. Four common surgical modalities were utilized: cold steel, electrocautery, coblation, and microdebrider. The resultant aerosol generated was evaluated using two measurement modalities at two key positions in the theater. (1) DustTrak Pro Aerosol Monitor was used to measure the concentration of particles. (2) Fluorescein dye coated on the oropharynx and larynx, and the resultant scatter on paper.

RESULTS

Electrocautery and coblation produced statistically significant increases in the concentration of aerosols ( < .001). Microdebrider and cold steel instrumentation produced the least aerosols. No measurable fluorescein droplets were noted for all four modalities.

CONCLUSION

Electrocautery and coblation produced higher concentrations of aerosols. Mitigation factors should be considered with instruments with increased aerosolization. These modalities show low droplet-related infection risk.

摘要

目的

确定口咽和喉部手术中常用术式产生气溶胶和飞沫最少的手术方式。

方法

使用新鲜羊头搭建口咽和喉部手术模拟模型。采用四种常见手术方式:冷器械、电灼、低温等离子消融和微型切割器。在手术室的两个关键位置使用两种测量方式评估产生的气溶胶。(1)使用DustTrak Pro气溶胶监测仪测量颗粒浓度。(2)在口咽和喉部涂抹荧光素染料,并测量纸张上产生的散射光。

结果

电灼和低温等离子消融产生的气溶胶浓度有统计学显著增加(<0.001)。微型切割器和冷器械产生的气溶胶最少。所有四种术式均未检测到可测量的荧光素飞沫。

结论

电灼和低温等离子消融产生的气溶胶浓度较高。对于气溶胶化增加的器械,应考虑减轻因素。这些术式显示与飞沫相关的感染风险较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/763a/11149762/a76021262b0b/LIO2-9-e1287-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/763a/11149762/6b346161ca6d/LIO2-9-e1287-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/763a/11149762/36f7d970be72/LIO2-9-e1287-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/763a/11149762/3d271df759aa/LIO2-9-e1287-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/763a/11149762/a76021262b0b/LIO2-9-e1287-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/763a/11149762/6b346161ca6d/LIO2-9-e1287-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/763a/11149762/36f7d970be72/LIO2-9-e1287-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/763a/11149762/3d271df759aa/LIO2-9-e1287-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/763a/11149762/a76021262b0b/LIO2-9-e1287-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Variation in aerosol generation by surgical modality during oropharyngeal and laryngeal surgery.口咽和喉部手术期间不同手术方式产生气溶胶的差异。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024 Jun 4;9(3):e1287. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1287. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Airborne Aerosolized Mouse Cytomegalovirus From Common Otolaryngology Procedures: Implications for COVID-19 Infection.空气中传播的鼠巨细胞病毒来自常见的耳鼻喉科手术:对 COVID-19 感染的影响。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Mar;164(3):547-555. doi: 10.1177/0194599820957966. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
3
Microdebrider is less aerosol-generating than CO laser and cold instruments in microlaryngoscopy.动力系统微切割器在喉显微手术中产生的气溶胶比 CO2 激光和冷器械少。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Feb;279(2):825-834. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07105-9. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
4
Endonasal instrumentation and aerosolization risk in the era of COVID-19: simulation, literature review, and proposed mitigation strategies.COVID-19 时代经鼻器械和雾化的风险:模拟、文献回顾和提出的缓解策略。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020 Jul;10(7):798-805. doi: 10.1002/alr.22577. Epub 2020 May 22.
5
Mitigation of Aerosols Generated During Rhinologic Surgery: A Pandemic-Era Cadaveric Simulation.鼻科学手术中气溶胶生成的缓解:大流行时代的尸体模拟。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Feb;164(2):433-442. doi: 10.1177/0194599820951169. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
6
Aerosol and droplet generation from orbital repair: Surgical risk in the pandemic era.眼眶修复术中的气溶胶和飞沫产生:大流行时代的手术风险。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Jul-Aug;42(4):102970. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.102970. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
7
Comparison of aerosol generation between electrocautery and cold dissection tonsillectomy.电切与冷剥离扁桃体切除术的气溶胶生成比较。
J Laryngol Otol. 2023 Jul;137(7):732-740. doi: 10.1017/S0022215123000324. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
8
Aerosol generation during cadaveric simulation of otologic surgery and live cochlear implantation.尸体模拟耳科手术及活体人工耳蜗植入过程中的气溶胶生成
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020 Dec 16;6(1):129-136. doi: 10.1002/lio2.506. eCollection 2021 Feb.
9
Quantifying Viral Particle Aerosolization Risk During Tracheostomy Surgery and Tracheostomy Care.量化气管切开术和气管切开护理期间病毒粒子气溶胶化风险。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Sep 1;147(9):797-803. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.1383.
10
Quantification of Aerosol Particle Concentrations During Endoscopic Sinonasal Surgery in the Operating Room.在手术室中进行鼻内镜鼻窦手术期间气溶胶颗粒浓度的量化。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2021 Jul;35(4):426-431. doi: 10.1177/1945892420962335. Epub 2020 Oct 4.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 and otorhinolaryngology: Returning to practice.新型冠状病毒肺炎与耳鼻咽喉科学:回归临床实践
S Afr J Infect Dis. 2021 Mar 26;36(1):256. doi: 10.4102/sajid.v36i1.256. eCollection 2021.
2
SARS-CoV-2 aerosol and droplets: an overview.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型气溶胶与飞沫概述
Virusdisease. 2021 Jun;32(2):190-197. doi: 10.1007/s13337-021-00660-z. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
3
Aerosol generation during routine rhinologic surgeries and in-office procedures.常规鼻科手术及门诊操作过程中的气溶胶生成。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021 Jan 14;6(1):49-57. doi: 10.1002/lio2.520. eCollection 2021 Feb.
4
Airborne Aerosolized Mouse Cytomegalovirus From Common Otolaryngology Procedures: Implications for COVID-19 Infection.空气中传播的鼠巨细胞病毒来自常见的耳鼻喉科手术:对 COVID-19 感染的影响。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Mar;164(3):547-555. doi: 10.1177/0194599820957966. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
5
Mitigation of Aerosols Generated During Rhinologic Surgery: A Pandemic-Era Cadaveric Simulation.鼻科学手术中气溶胶生成的缓解:大流行时代的尸体模拟。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Feb;164(2):433-442. doi: 10.1177/0194599820951169. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
6
SARS, MERS and COVID-19 among healthcare workers: A narrative review.医护人员中的 SARS、MERS 和 COVID-19:叙事性综述。
J Infect Public Health. 2020 Jun;13(6):843-848. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.05.019. Epub 2020 May 27.
7
Airborne Aerosol Generation During Endonasal Procedures in the Era of COVID-19: Risks and Recommendations.COVID-19 疫情期间经鼻内镜手术过程中空气传播气溶胶的产生:风险与建议。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Sep;163(3):465-470. doi: 10.1177/0194599820931805. Epub 2020 May 26.
8
Exploration of strategies to reduce aerosol-spread during chest compressions: A simulation and cadaver model.探索在胸外按压期间减少气溶胶传播的策略:一项模拟和尸体模型研究。
Resuscitation. 2020 Jul;152:192-198. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.05.012. Epub 2020 May 11.
9
Aerosol-generating otolaryngology procedures and the need for enhanced PPE during the COVID-19 pandemic: a literature review.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,产生气溶胶的耳鼻喉科手术和对增强型个人防护装备的需求:文献综述。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 May 11;49(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40463-020-00424-7.
10
Clinical evidence based review and recommendations of aerosol generating medical procedures in otolaryngology - head and neck surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.基于临床证据的耳鼻喉头颈外科 COVID-19 大流行期间气溶胶产生医疗操作的回顾和建议。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 May 6;49(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40463-020-00425-6.