Gandhi Henal A, Srilatha K T, Deshmukh Seema, Venkatesh M P, Das Tanmoy, Sharieff Irfaan
Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, JSS Dental College and Hospital, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.
Department of Pharmaceutics, JSS College of Pharmacy, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Sep-Oct;13(5):543-550. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1818.
Among the various plants studied, cinnamon has emerged as a potential herbal antimicrobial agent. Besides the medicinal plants, recently probiotics have also been recognized to affect cinnamon bark oil and other harmful oral and gut microflora.
This placebo-controlled study aims to compare the antimicrobial potential of cinnamon bark oil incorporated and probiotic blend [ (TSP-Lp1), and (TSP-Lrh1)] incorporated mucoadhesive patch against salivary in caries active 7-10-year-old children.
It was a double-blinded placebo-controlled study with = 60. They were randomly allotted into three groups-Group I: Cinnamon patch, group II: probiotic patch, and group III: control patch (placebo) with = 20 in each group.
The study was carried out in three phases. In the first phase, the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of cinnamon bark oil was determined against followed by the formulation of cinnamon and probiotic patches. After a washout period of 2 weeks and a collection of baseline saliva samples, these patches were tested on the subjects from respective groups for 14 days with twice a day placement protocol. On the 15th day, saliva samples were collected and cultured, CFU/mL of the saliva of for each subject was recorded and compared with baseline samples. Feedback in the form of a questionnaire was obtained from the patients.
Descriptive statistics, paired -test for intragroup comparison, unpaired -test for intergroup comparison, analysis of variance (ANOVA) for intergroup comparison, and Scheffe's.
The results showed that both cinnamon patch and probiotic patch were comparable to each other in terms of their anti- activity. The intragroup comparison of the CFU/mL count showed a highly significant reduction from baseline to post-intervention for both the groups ( = 0.001).
Both cinnamon and probiotic blend have a strong antimicrobial property owing to their ability to cause significant reduction in salivary and both the patches showed good patient acceptance.
Gandhi HA, Srilatha KT, Deshmukh S, Comparison of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Cinnamon Bark Oil Incorporated and Probiotic Blend Incorporated Mucoadhesive Patch against Salivary in Caries Active 7-10-year-old Children: An Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(5):543-550.
在众多已研究的植物中,肉桂已成为一种潜在的草药抗菌剂。除了药用植物外,最近益生菌也被认为会影响肉桂树皮油以及其他有害的口腔和肠道微生物群。
本安慰剂对照研究旨在比较含肉桂树皮油的粘膜粘附贴片和含益生菌混合物[(TSP-Lp1)和(TSP-Lrh1)]的粘膜粘附贴片对7至10岁患龋活跃儿童唾液中[某种微生物,原文未明确]的抗菌潜力。
这是一项双盲安慰剂对照研究,n = 60。他们被随机分为三组——第一组:肉桂贴片组,第二组:益生菌贴片组,第三组:对照贴片(安慰剂)组,每组20人。
研究分三个阶段进行。在第一阶段,测定肉桂树皮油对[某种微生物,原文未明确]的最低抑菌浓度(MIC),随后制备肉桂和益生菌贴片。在2周的洗脱期和收集基线唾液样本后,将这些贴片按照每天放置两次的方案在各相应组的受试者身上测试14天。在第15天,收集唾液样本并进行培养,记录每个受试者唾液中[某种微生物,原文未明确]的CFU/mL,并与基线样本进行比较。从患者那里获得问卷形式的反馈。
描述性统计、组内比较的配对t检验、组间比较的非配对t检验、组间比较的方差分析(ANOVA)以及谢费检验。
结果表明,肉桂贴片和益生菌贴片在抗[某种微生物,原文未明确]活性方面彼此相当。两组的CFU/mL计数的组内比较显示,从基线到干预后均有极显著降低(p = 0.001)。
肉桂和益生菌混合物均具有很强的抗菌特性,因为它们能够使唾液中[某种微生物,原文未明确]显著减少,并且两种贴片都显示出良好的患者接受度。
甘地HA,斯里拉塔KT,德什穆克S,《含肉桂树皮油和含益生菌混合物的粘膜粘附贴片对7至10岁患龋活跃儿童唾液中[某种微生物,原文未明确]的抗菌疗效比较:一项[研究类型未明确]研究》。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2020;13(5):543 - 550。