Olkun Hatice Kübra, Olkun Refika Saliha
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of İstanbul Okan, İstanbul, Turkey.
Private Practice, İstanbul, Turkey.
Health Technol (Berl). 2021;11(2):437-441. doi: 10.1007/s12553-021-00526-w. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
This study aims to evaluate the content of information in three different search engines in terms of orthodontics as the source of information at the current stage of the COVID-19 outbreak. An internet search was conducted on April 10th, 2020, using the most popular search engines: GoogleTM, BingTM, and Yahoo!® with the keyword "coronavirus orthodontics". Top 10 websites were evaluated for each search engine. After excluding duplicates the remaining 23 sites were saved in Microsoft Excel programme and evaluated by two independent researchers (HKO and RSO; both experienced orthodontists) using the modified DISCERN tool and JAMA benchmarks. The websites were also classified as "useful, misleading and news updates". Sixty one percent of the websites were classified as useful, 26% as misleading, and 13% as news updates. Most of the authors of the websites were unknown (35%) and followed by orthodontists (30%). The DISCERN and JAMA scores of the four websites were excellent and their target audience were orthodontists. The average modified DISCERN score of 23 websites was moderate (average score 2,8). Useful websites had a significantly higher number of DISCERN and JAMA scores than the misleading websites ( < 0.05). Most of the information available in three different search engines about orthodontics related to COVID-19 were useful. The most reliable websites belonged to American Association of Orthodontists (AAO), Australian Society of Orthodontists (ASO), and British Orthodontic Society (BOS), and they appeared on the first page of the GoogleTM.
本研究旨在评估在新冠疫情爆发现阶段,作为信息来源的三个不同搜索引擎中有关正畸学的信息内容。2020年4月10日,使用最流行的搜索引擎谷歌、必应和雅虎,以“冠状病毒正畸学”为关键词进行了互联网搜索。对每个搜索引擎的前10个网站进行了评估。排除重复项后,将剩余的23个网站保存在微软Excel程序中,并由两名独立研究人员(HKO和RSO;均为经验丰富的正畸医生)使用改良的DISCERN工具和《美国医学会杂志》基准进行评估。这些网站还被分类为“有用、误导性和新闻更新”。61%的网站被分类为有用,26%为误导性,13%为新闻更新。网站的大多数作者身份不明(35%),其次是正畸医生(30%)。四个网站的DISCERN和《美国医学会杂志》评分优秀,其目标受众为正畸医生。23个网站的平均改良DISCERN评分为中等(平均得分2.8)。有用网站的DISCERN和《美国医学会杂志》评分显著高于误导性网站(<0.05)。三个不同搜索引擎中有关与新冠疫情相关正畸学的大多数信息是有用的。最可靠的网站属于美国正畸医师协会(AAO)、澳大利亚正畸医师协会(ASO)和英国正畸学会(BOS),它们出现在谷歌的第一页。