Dimke Henrik, Larsen Sanne L, Skov Marianne N, Larsen Hanne, Hartmeyer Gitte N, Moeller Jesper B
Department of Cardiovascular and Renal Research, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Nephrology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 24;16(2):e0247524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247524. eCollection 2021.
The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) rapidly reached pandemic levels. Sufficient testing for SARS-CoV-2 has remained essential for tracking and containing the virus. SARS-CoV-2 testing capabilities are still limited in many countries. Here, we explore the use of conventional RNA purification as an alternative to automated systems for detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR. 87 clinical swab specimens were extracted by conventional phenol-chloroform RNA purification and compared to commercial platforms for RNA extraction and the fully integrated Cobas®6800 diagnostic system. Our results show that the conventional RNA extraction is fully comparable to modern automated systems regarding analytical sensitivity and specificity with respect to detection of SARS-CoV-2 as evaluated by RT-qPCR. Moreover, the method is easily scalable and implemented in conventional laboratories as a low cost and suitable alternative to automated systems for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的爆发迅速达到了大流行程度。对SARS-CoV-2进行充分检测对于追踪和控制该病毒仍然至关重要。在许多国家,SARS-CoV-2的检测能力仍然有限。在此,我们探索使用传统的RNA纯化方法作为自动化系统的替代方法,通过逆转录定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)检测SARS-CoV-2。通过传统的苯酚-氯仿RNA纯化方法提取了87份临床拭子标本,并与用于RNA提取的商业平台以及完全集成的Cobas®6800诊断系统进行了比较。我们的结果表明,通过RT-qPCR评估,在检测SARS-CoV-2的分析灵敏度和特异性方面,传统RNA提取方法与现代自动化系统完全可比。此外,该方法易于扩展,并且可以在传统实验室中实施,作为检测SARS-CoV-2的自动化系统的低成本且合适的替代方法。