Division of Esophageal Surgery, Akita University Hospital, Akita, Japan.
Department of Comprehensive Cancer Control, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Ann Surg. 2022 Jul 1;276(1):e16-e23. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004437. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
To determine whether esophagectomy provides a survival advantage in octogenarians with resectable thoracic esophageal cancer.
Elderly patients with thoracic esophageal cancer do not always receive the full standard treatment; however, advanced age alone should not preclude the use of effective treatment that could meaningfully improve survival.
We retrieved the 2008 to 2011 data from the National Database of Hospital-based Cancer Registries from the National Cancer Centerin Japan, divided the patients into a ≥75 group (75-79 years; n = 2935) and a ≥80 group (80 years or older; n = 2131), and then compared the patient backgrounds and survival curves. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was developed to compare the effects of esophagectomy and chemoradiotherapy in the 2 groups.
A significantly greater percentage of patients were treated with esoph-agectomy in the ≥75 group (34.6%) than the ≥80 group (18.4%). Among patients who received esophagectomy, the 3-year survival rate was 51.1% in the ≥ 75 group and 39.0% in the ≥80 group (P < 0.001). However, among patients who received chemoradiotherapy, there was no difference in survival curve between the 2 groups (P = 0.17). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that esoph-agectomy for clinical Stage ii-iii patients was significantly associated to better survival (adjusted HR: 0.731) (95%CI: 0.645-0.829, P < 0.001) in the ≥75 group but not the ≥ 80 group when compared with chemoradiotherapy.
Many octogenarians do not necessarily get a survival benefit from esophagectomy. However, patients should be evaluated based on their overall health before ruling out surgery based on age alone.
确定在可切除的胸段食管癌的 80 岁以上高龄患者中,食管癌切除术是否具有生存优势。
高龄患者患有胸段食管癌并不总是接受完整的标准治疗;然而,仅仅是年龄增长不应排除使用能够显著改善生存的有效治疗方法。
我们从日本国家癌症中心的全国医院癌症登记数据库中检索了 2008 年至 2011 年的数据,将患者分为≥75 岁组(75-79 岁;n = 2935)和≥80 岁组(80 岁或以上;n = 2131),然后比较患者背景和生存曲线。采用多变量 Cox 比例风险回归模型比较了 2 组中食管癌切除术和放化疗的效果。
在≥75 岁组中,接受食管癌切除术的患者比例(34.6%)明显高于≥80 岁组(18.4%)。在接受食管癌切除术的患者中,≥75 岁组的 3 年生存率为 51.1%,≥80 岁组为 39.0%(P<0.001)。然而,在接受放化疗的患者中,2 组的生存曲线无差异(P=0.17)。多变量 Cox 比例风险分析显示,对于临床分期 II-III 期的患者,与放化疗相比,食管癌切除术显著与更好的生存相关(调整后的 HR:0.731)(95%CI:0.645-0.829,P<0.001)在≥75 岁组中,但在≥80 岁组中则不然。
许多 80 岁以上的高龄患者并不一定从食管癌切除术获得生存获益。然而,在仅根据年龄排除手术之前,应根据患者的整体健康状况对其进行评估。