• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会语境和社会联系对视觉感知过程的影响。

The influence of social context and social connection on visual perceptual processes.

机构信息

Department of Human Kinetics, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS, Canada.

Psychology Department, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS, Canada.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Apr;215:103270. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103270. Epub 2021 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103270
PMID:33639445
Abstract

The aim of this study was twofold: (1) to re-test whether a minimal social context has an influence on gaze patterns, and (2) to determine if a social connection (i.e., friendship) has a modulatory effect on gaze patterns in a minimal social context. In Experiment 1, two unacquainted participants were paired and seated at separate testing stations in the same room. At the beginning of each trial, participants were informed whether they were looking at different image sets (solo trials), or the same image set (joint trials). Image sets consisted of a positive, a negative, and two neutral images. No explicit task instructions were provided and there was no interaction between participants during the task. Experiment 2 was identical to Experiment 1, except that participants were paired with a friend. The fixation-based metrics of interest were time to first fixation (TFF) and total fixation duration (TFD). The findings revealed that social context has a modulatory effect on attentional capture (i.e., TFF) irrespective of social connection. Unexpectedly, a negativity bias was found to hold attention (i.e., TFD) regardless of social context. However, having a social connection did increase the time spent looking at positive images on the joint trials. Having a social connection with another person seems to alter looking behaviour such that more time is spent looking at positive images on the joint trials compared to the solo trials. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating both TFD and TFF to develop a better understanding of the factors underlying joint perception.

摘要

本研究旨在达成两个目标

(1) 重新检验在最小社交情境下,社交情境是否会影响注视模式;(2) 确定社交关系(即友谊)是否会对最小社交情境下的注视模式产生调节作用。在实验 1 中,两个互不相识的参与者被配对并坐在同一房间的不同测试站。在每个试验开始时,参与者被告知他们是在看不同的图像集(单人试验)还是相同的图像集(联合试验)。图像集由一个正性、一个负性和两个中性图像组成。在任务期间没有提供明确的任务说明,参与者之间也没有任何互动。实验 2 与实验 1 相同,只是参与者与朋友配对。感兴趣的基于注视的指标是首次注视时间 (TFF) 和总注视时间 (TFD)。研究结果表明,无论社交关系如何,社交情境对注意力捕获(即 TFF)都具有调节作用。出乎意料的是,无论社交情境如何,负性偏见都能吸引注意力(即 TFD)。然而,有社交关系确实会增加在联合试验中观看正性图像的时间。与他人建立社交关系似乎会改变观看行为,使得在联合试验中观看正性图像的时间比单人试验中更多。这些发现强调了评估 TFD 和 TFF 的重要性,以更好地理解联合感知背后的因素。

相似文献

1
The influence of social context and social connection on visual perceptual processes.社会语境和社会联系对视觉感知过程的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Apr;215:103270. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103270. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
2
Joint attention facilitates observed gaze direction discrimination.共同注意有助于观察到的注视方向辨别。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Jan;73(1):80-90. doi: 10.1177/1747021819867901. Epub 2019 Aug 18.
3
Responding to joint attention bids in schizophrenia: An interactive eye-tracking study.精神分裂症患者对共同注意示意的反应:一项交互式眼动追踪研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Aug;72(8):2068-2083. doi: 10.1177/1747021819829718. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
4
Gaze in a real-world social interaction: A dual eye-tracking study.现实世界社交互动中的注视:一项双眼追踪研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Oct;71(10):2162-2173. doi: 10.1177/1747021817739221. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
5
Seeing eye-to-eye: Social gaze interactions influence gaze direction identification.看法一致:社会注视互动会影响注视方向识别。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Nov;81(8):2755-2765. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01671-1.
6
The impact of perceived social power and dangerous context on social attention.感知到的社会权力和危险情境对社会注意力的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 2;9(12):e114077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114077. eCollection 2014.
7
Gaze allocation in face-to-face communication is affected primarily by task structure and social context, not stimulus-driven factors.在面对面的交流中,注视分配主要受到任务结构和社会语境的影响,而不是由刺激驱动的因素。
Cognition. 2019 Mar;184:28-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.005. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
8
Gaze allocation in a dynamic situation: effects of social status and speaking.动态情境中的目光分配:社会地位和说话的影响
Cognition. 2010 Dec;117(3):319-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.003. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
9
Joint perception: gaze and social context.联合感知:注视与社会背景。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jul 3;6:194. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00194. eCollection 2012.
10
Looking Behavior and Audiovisual Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing and Children With Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss.听力正常儿童以及双侧或单侧轻度听力损失儿童的注视行为与视听言语理解
Ear Hear. 2018 Jul/Aug;39(4):783-794. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000534.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual memory of a co-actor's target during joint search.共同搜索中对协作者目标的视觉记忆
Psychol Res. 2023 Oct;87(7):2068-2085. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01819-7. Epub 2023 Mar 28.