Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):605-608. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2021-0022. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
To provide novel insight regarding the influence of exercise modality on training load management by (1) providing a theoretical framework for the impact of physiological and biomechanical mechanisms associated with different exercise modalities on training load management in endurance exercise and (2) comparing effort-matched low-intensity training sessions performed by top-level athletes in endurance sports with similar energy demands. Practical Applications and Conclusions: The ability to perform endurance training with manageable muscular loads and low injury risks in different exercise modalities is influenced both by mechanical factors and by muscular state and coordination, which interrelate in optimizing power production while reducing friction and/or drag. Consequently, the choice of exercise modality in endurance training influences effort beyond commonly used external and internal load measurements and should be considered alongside duration, frequency, and intensity when managing training load. By comparing effort-matched low- to moderate-intensity sessions performed by top-level athletes in endurance sports, this study exemplifies how endurance exercise with varying modalities leads to different tolerable volumes. For example, the weight-bearing exercise and high-impact forces in long-distance running put high loads on muscles and tendons, leading to relatively low training volume tolerance. In speed skating, the flexed knee and hip position required for effective speed skating leads to occlusion of thighs and low volume tolerance. In contrast, the non-weight-bearing, low-contraction exercises in cycling or swimming allow for large volumes in the specific exercise modalities. Overall, these differences have major implications on training load management in sports.
为了提供关于运动方式对训练负荷管理影响的新见解,(1)通过提供与不同运动方式相关的生理和生物力学机制对耐力运动训练负荷管理的影响的理论框架,以及(2)比较耐力运动中顶级运动员进行的具有相似能量需求的努力匹配的低强度训练,来进行探讨。实际应用和结论:在不同的运动方式中进行可管理的肌肉负荷和低受伤风险的耐力训练的能力既受机械因素的影响,也受肌肉状态和协调性的影响,这些因素相互关联,以优化功率输出,同时减少摩擦和/或阻力。因此,耐力训练中运动方式的选择会影响到除了常用的外部和内部负荷测量之外的努力,并且在管理训练负荷时,应与持续时间、频率和强度一起考虑。通过比较耐力运动中顶级运动员进行的努力匹配的低至中强度训练,可以例证不同运动方式的耐力运动如何导致不同的可耐受量。例如,长跑中的负重和高冲击力会给肌肉和肌腱带来高负荷,导致相对较低的训练量耐受。在速度滑冰中,有效速度滑冰所需的弯曲膝盖和臀部位置会导致大腿闭塞和低容量耐受。相比之下,骑自行车或游泳中的非负重、低收缩运动允许在特定的运动方式中进行大量运动。总体而言,这些差异对运动中的训练负荷管理有重大影响。