• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[一种功能分类方法在老年人中的预测效度:老年人功能分类方法的预测效度]

[Predictive validity of a functional classification method in older adultsValidação preditiva de método de classificação funcional em idosos].

作者信息

García-Arango Víctor, Osorio-Ciro Jorge, Aguirre-Acevedo Daniel, Vanegas-Vargas Catalina, Clavijo-Usuga Carmen, Gallo-Villegas Jaime

机构信息

Universidad de Antioquia Medellín Colombia Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

Institución Prestadora de Servicios de Salud Universitaria Medellín Colombia Institución Prestadora de Servicios de Salud Universitaria, Medellín, Colombia.

出版信息

Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2021 Feb 26;45:e15. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2021.15. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.26633/RPSP.2021.15
PMID:33643398
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7905750/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the predictive validity of a functional classification (FC) method for the use of emergency services and hospitalization, mortality, and health care costs among older adults.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study that included 2 168 older adults in a chronic noncommunicable disease (CNCD) care program in Medellin, Colombia. Patients were stratified according to a FC method based on functional status, presence of risk factors, and control of comorbidity. During one year of follow-up, the predictive validity of the FC method was assessed for the studied outcomes. Discrimination and calibration were measured with the C-statistic and Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test, respectively.

RESULTS

The average age was 74.6 ± 7.9 years; 40.8% (n = 884) were men and 7.7% (n = 168) died. The risk of death (odds ratio [OR]: 1.767; 3.411; 8.525), hospitalization (OR: 1.397; 2.172; 3.540) and high cost of health care (OR: 1.703; 2.369; 5.073) increased in proportion to a deterioration in functional classification (classes 2B, 3, and 4, respectively). The predictive model for the outcome of death showed good capacity for discrimination (C-statistic = 0.721) and calibration (HL statistic 10.200; = 0.251).

CONCLUSION

There is a dose-response relationship between deterioration in FC and a higher risk of death, hospitalization, and high cost. FC has predictive validity for the mortality rate and could be used to stratify older adults in CNCD care programs with a view to guiding interventions.

摘要

目的

评估一种功能分类(FC)方法对老年人使用急诊服务和住院治疗、死亡率及医疗保健费用的预测效度。

方法

进行回顾性队列研究,纳入了哥伦比亚麦德林市一个慢性非传染性疾病(CNCD)护理项目中的2168名老年人。根据基于功能状态、危险因素的存在情况及合并症控制情况的FC方法对患者进行分层。在一年的随访期间,评估FC方法对所研究结局的预测效度。分别用C统计量和Hosmer-Lemeshow(HL)检验来衡量区分度和校准度。

结果

平均年龄为74.6±7.9岁;40.8%(n = 884)为男性,7.7%(n = 168)死亡。死亡风险(比值比[OR]:1.767;3.411;8.525)、住院风险(OR:1.397;2.172;3.540)和高医疗保健费用风险(OR:1.703;2.369;5.073)随着功能分类的恶化(分别为2B、3和4级)而按比例增加。死亡结局的预测模型显示出良好的区分能力(C统计量 = 0.721)和校准度(HL统计量10.200;P = 0.251)。

结论

FC的恶化与更高的死亡、住院和高费用风险之间存在剂量反应关系。FC对死亡率具有预测效度,可用于对CNCD护理项目中的老年人进行分层,以指导干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e32/7905750/f9c44b46d7f6/rpsp-45-e15_Figure3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e32/7905750/426bfa2c307c/rpsp-45-e15_Figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e32/7905750/216d92514409/rpsp-45-e15_Figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e32/7905750/f9c44b46d7f6/rpsp-45-e15_Figure3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e32/7905750/426bfa2c307c/rpsp-45-e15_Figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e32/7905750/216d92514409/rpsp-45-e15_Figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e32/7905750/f9c44b46d7f6/rpsp-45-e15_Figure3.jpg

相似文献

1
[Predictive validity of a functional classification method in older adultsValidação preditiva de método de classificação funcional em idosos].[一种功能分类方法在老年人中的预测效度:老年人功能分类方法的预测效度]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2021 Feb 26;45:e15. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2021.15. eCollection 2021.
2
Clinical-Functional Vulnerability Index-20 (IVCF-20): rapid recognition of frail older adults.临床功能脆弱指数-20(IVCF-20):快速识别体弱老年人。
Rev Saude Publica. 2016 Dec 22;50:81. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050006963.
3
Hospitalization in older adults: association with multimorbidity, primary health care and private health plan.老年人住院治疗:与多种疾病并存、初级卫生保健及私人健康保险的关联
Rev Saude Publica. 2017 May 4;51:43. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2017051006646.
4
Validity of questions about activities of daily living to screen for dependency in older adults.用于筛查老年人生活依赖状况的日常生活活动问题的有效性。
Rev Saude Publica. 2017 Sep 4;51:84. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051006959.
5
Psychometric properties of the Vulnerability to Abuse Screening Scale for screening abuse of older adults.用于筛查老年人受虐情况的受虐易感性筛查量表的心理测量特性。
Rev Saude Publica. 2017 Apr 10;51:31. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2017051006839.
6
[Development of a predictive model of death or urgent hospitalization to identify frail elderly].[建立用于识别体弱老年人的死亡或紧急住院预测模型]
Epidemiol Prev. 2016 Nov-Dec;40(6):395-403. doi: 10.19191/EP16.6.P395.119.
7
The performance of the Dutch Safety Management System frailty tool to predict the risk of readmission or mortality in older hospitalised cardiac patients.荷兰安全管理系统脆弱性工具预测老年住院心脏患者再入院或死亡风险的性能。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 May 8;21(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02243-5.
8
Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype.老年人的衰弱:一种表型的证据。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146.
9
Predictive Accuracy of Frailty Tools for Adverse Outcomes in a Cohort of Adults 80 Years and Older: A Decision Curve Analysis.衰弱工具对 80 岁及以上成年人队列不良结局预测准确性的决策曲线分析。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Mar;21(3):440.e1-440.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.08.029. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
10
Elevated Heart Rate is Associated with Cardiac Denervation in Patients with Heart Failure: A 123-Iodine-MIBG Myocardial Scintigraphy Study.心率升高与心力衰竭患者心脏去神经支配有关:一项123碘-间碘苄胍心肌闪烁显像研究
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016 Nov;107(5):455-459. doi: 10.5935/abc.20160166.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of the Risk of Adverse Clinical Outcomes with Machine Learning Techniques in Patients with Noncommunicable Diseases.运用机器学习技术预测非传染性疾病患者不良临床结局的风险
J Med Syst. 2025 Feb 3;49(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s10916-025-02140-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Health and care service utilisation and cost over the life-span: a descriptive analysis of population data.全生命周期的健康和医疗服务利用与成本:基于人群数据的描述性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 19;20(1):435. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05295-2.
2
Identifying subgroups of high-need, high-cost, chronically ill patients in primary care: A latent class analysis.在基层医疗中识别高需求、高花费、慢性病患者亚组:潜在类别分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 29;15(1):e0228103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228103. eCollection 2020.
3
A general framework for classifying costing methods for economic evaluation of health care.
一种用于分类卫生保健经济评价成本核算方法的通用框架。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Jun;21(4):529-542. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01157-9. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
4
Identifying subgroups of persons with multimorbidity based on their needs for care and support.基于对医疗护理和支持的需求识别多病共存患者亚组。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Dec 27;20(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1069-6.
5
Drivers of High-cost Medical Complexity in a Medicaid Population.医疗补助人群中高医疗费用复杂度的驱动因素。
Med Care. 2020 Mar;58(3):208-215. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001261.
6
Defining 'actionable' high- costhealth care use: results using the Canadian Institute for Health Information population grouping methodology.定义“可操作的”高成本医疗保健使用:使用加拿大健康信息研究所人群分组方法的结果。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Nov 10;18(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1074-3.
7
Characterization of high healthcare utilizer groups using administrative data from an electronic medical record database.利用电子病历数据库中的管理数据对高医疗利用群体进行特征描述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 5;19(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4239-2.
8
Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).2018 年美国糖尿病协会(ADA)和欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)共识报告:2 型糖尿病患者高血糖管理。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Dec;41(12):2669-2701. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0033. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
9
Systematic review of high-cost patients' characteristics and healthcare utilisation.高成本患者特征及医疗保健利用的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 8;8(9):e023113. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023113.
10
2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会动脉高血压管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3021-3104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339.