Lippi Catherine A, Gaff Holly D, White Alexis L, Ryan Sadie J
Department of Geography, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
PeerJ. 2021 Feb 17;9:e10596. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10596. eCollection 2021.
The rising prevalence of tick-borne diseases in humans in recent decades has called attention to the need for more information on geographic risk for public health planning. Species distribution models (SDMs) are an increasingly utilized method of constructing potential geographic ranges. There are many knowledge gaps in our understanding of risk of exposure to tick-borne pathogens, particularly for those in the rickettsial group. Here, we conducted a systematic scoping review of the SDM literature for rickettsial pathogens and tick vectors in the genus . Of the 174 reviewed articles, only 24 studies used SDMs to estimate the potential extent of vector and/or pathogen ranges. The majority of studies (79%) estimated only tick distributions using vector presence as a proxy for pathogen exposure. Studies were conducted at different scales and across multiple continents. Few studies undertook original data collection, and SDMs were mostly built with presence-only datasets from public database or surveillance sources. The reliance on existing data sources, using ticks as a proxy for disease risk, may simply reflect a lag in new data acquisition and a thorough understanding of the tick-pathogen ecology involved.
近几十年来,蜱传疾病在人类中的患病率不断上升,这使得人们开始关注在公共卫生规划中获取更多地理风险信息的必要性。物种分布模型(SDMs)是一种越来越多地用于构建潜在地理范围的方法。在我们对蜱传病原体暴露风险的理解方面存在许多知识空白,特别是对于立克次氏体属的病原体。在此,我们对有关立克次氏体病原体和该属蜱类媒介的物种分布模型文献进行了系统的范围综述。在174篇综述文章中,只有24项研究使用物种分布模型来估计媒介和/或病原体范围的潜在范围。大多数研究(79%)仅使用媒介存在情况作为病原体暴露的替代指标来估计蜱的分布。研究在不同尺度上进行,且涉及多个大陆。很少有研究进行原始数据收集,物种分布模型大多是使用来自公共数据库或监测来源的仅存在数据集构建的。依赖现有数据源,将蜱作为疾病风险的替代指标,可能仅仅反映了新数据获取方面的滞后以及对蜱-病原体生态的全面理解。