• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字表型与敏感健康数据:对数据治理的影响。

Digital phenotyping and sensitive health data: Implications for data governance.

机构信息

MRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

The Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Aug 13;28(9):2002-2008. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab012.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocab012
PMID:33647989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8363798/
Abstract

In this perspective we want to highlight the rise of what we call "digital phenotyping" or inferring insights about peopleãs health and behavior from their digital devices and data, and the challenges this introduces. Indeed, the collection, processing, and storage of data comes with significant ethical, security and data governance considerations. The COVID-19 pandemic has laid bare the importance of scientific data and modeling, both to understand the nature and spread of the disease, and to develop treatment. But digital devices have also played a (controversial) role, with track and trace systems and increasingly "vaccine passports" being rolled out to help societies open back up. These systems epitomize a wider and longer-standing trend towards seeing almost any form of personal data as potentially health data, especially with the rise of consumer health trackers and other gadgets. Here, we offer an overview of the risks this introduces, drawing on the earlier revolution in genomic sequencing, and propose guidelines to help protect privacy whilst utilizing personal data to help get society back up to speed.

摘要

在这个视角下,我们想强调一下所谓“数字表型”的兴起,即从人们的数字设备和数据中推断出他们的健康和行为洞察,以及这带来的挑战。实际上,数据的收集、处理和存储带来了重大的伦理、安全和数据治理方面的考量。新冠疫情凸显了科学数据和建模的重要性,既有助于理解疾病的性质和传播,也有助于开发治疗方法。但是,数字设备也发挥了(有争议的)作用,追踪和溯源系统以及越来越多的“疫苗护照”被推出,以帮助社会重新开放。这些系统体现了一个更广泛和更长期的趋势,即将几乎任何形式的个人数据都视为潜在的健康数据,尤其是随着消费者健康追踪器和其他小工具的兴起。在这里,我们借鉴基因组测序的早期革命,概述了这带来的风险,并提出了一些指导方针,以帮助在利用个人数据帮助社会恢复正常的同时保护隐私。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb4/8363798/a01ccecf7515/ocab012f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb4/8363798/a01ccecf7515/ocab012f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb4/8363798/a01ccecf7515/ocab012f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Digital phenotyping and sensitive health data: Implications for data governance.数字表型与敏感健康数据:对数据治理的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Aug 13;28(9):2002-2008. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab012.
2
Ethical Development of Digital Phenotyping Tools for Mental Health Applications: Delphi Study.数字表型工具在精神健康应用中的伦理发展:德尔菲研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jul 28;9(7):e27343. doi: 10.2196/27343.
3
Ethics, Integrity, and Retributions of Digital Detection Surveillance Systems for Infectious Diseases: Systematic Literature Review.传染病数字检测监测系统的伦理、诚信和回报:系统文献回顾。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 20;23(10):e32328. doi: 10.2196/32328.
4
Telehealth interventions during COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review of applications, challenges, privacy and security issues.新冠疫情期间的远程医疗干预措施:应用、挑战、隐私和安全问题的范围综述。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 Aug;30(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100676.
5
In the shadow of privacy: Overlooked ethical concerns in COVID-19 digital epidemiology.在隐私的阴影下:被忽视的 COVID-19 数字流行病学中的伦理问题。
Epidemics. 2022 Dec;41:100652. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100652. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
6
Personal data usage and privacy considerations in the COVID-19 global pandemic.新冠疫情全球大流行中的个人数据使用与隐私考量
Cien Saude Colet. 2020 Jun;25(suppl 1):2487-2492. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232020256.1.11792020. Epub 2020 May 1.
7
Contextual Acceptance of COVID-19 Mitigation Mobile Apps in the United States: Mixed Methods Survey Study on Postpandemic Data Privacy.美国 COVID-19 缓解移动应用程序的使用背景:后疫情时代数据隐私的混合方法调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 29;26:e57309. doi: 10.2196/57309.
8
Consumer Views on Using Digital Data for COVID-19 Control in the United States.消费者对美国使用数字数据进行新冠疫情控制的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2110918. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10918.
9
Rapid Deployment of a Free, Privacy-Assured COVID-19 Symptom Tracker for Public Safety During Reopening: System Development and Feasibility Study.快速部署免费的、隐私得到保障的 COVID-19 症状跟踪器,以在重新开放期间保障公共安全:系统开发和可行性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Aug 13;6(3):e19399. doi: 10.2196/19399.
10
Application of Big Data Technology for COVID-19 Prevention and Control in China: Lessons and Recommendations.大数据技术在中国新冠肺炎疫情防控中的应用:经验与建议
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 9;22(10):e21980. doi: 10.2196/21980.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges and standardisation strategies for sensor-based data collection for digital phenotyping.数字表型中基于传感器的数据收集面临的挑战与标准化策略
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Aug 19;5(1):360. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-01013-3.
2
Evaluating the effectiveness of data governance frameworks in ensuring security and privacy of healthcare data: A quantitative analysis of ISO standards, GDPR, and HIPAA in blockchain technology.评估数据治理框架在确保医疗数据安全和隐私方面的有效性:对区块链技术中ISO标准、通用数据保护条例(GDPR)和健康保险流通与责任法案(HIPAA)的定量分析。
PLoS One. 2025 May 23;20(5):e0324285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324285. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The future of digital health with federated learning.联合学习助力数字健康的未来。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Sep 14;3:119. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00323-1. eCollection 2020.
2
How to fix the GDPR's frustration of global biomedical research.如何解决《通用数据保护条例》给全球生物医学研究带来的困扰。
Science. 2020 Oct 2;370(6512):40-42. doi: 10.1126/science.abd2499. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
3
COVID-19 contact tracing apps: a stress test for privacy, the GDPR, and data protection regimes.新冠疫情接触者追踪应用程序:对隐私、《通用数据保护条例》及数据保护制度的压力测试
Digital Phenotyping in Health Using Machine Learning Approaches: Scoping Review.
使用机器学习方法进行健康领域的数字表型分析:范围综述
JMIR Bioinform Biotechnol. 2022 Jul 18;3(1):e39618. doi: 10.2196/39618.
4
Security Implications of AI Chatbots in Health Care.人工智能聊天机器人在医疗保健中的安全隐患。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 28;25:e47551. doi: 10.2196/47551.
5
Ethical Development of Digital Phenotyping Tools for Mental Health Applications: Delphi Study.数字表型工具在精神健康应用中的伦理发展:德尔菲研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jul 28;9(7):e27343. doi: 10.2196/27343.
J Law Biosci. 2020 May 28;7(1):lsaa034. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa034. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun.
4
Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data.医学中的联邦学习:在不共享患者数据的情况下促进多机构合作。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 28;10(1):12598. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69250-1.
5
Opportunities and challenges in the collection and analysis of digital phenotyping data.数字表型数据收集与分析中的机遇与挑战。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Jan;46(1):45-54. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-0771-3. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
6
Ethical guidelines for COVID-19 tracing apps.新冠病毒追踪应用程序的伦理准则。
Nature. 2020 Jun;582(7810):29-31. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01578-0.
7
Electronic Informed Consent in Mobile Applications Research.移动应用研究中的电子知情同意书。
J Law Med Ethics. 2020 Mar;48(1_suppl):147-153. doi: 10.1177/1073110520917040.
8
When health tech companies change their terms of service.当健康科技公司更改其服务条款时。
Science. 2020 Feb 14;367(6479):745-746. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz6732.
9
Population-scale hand tremor analysis via anonymized mouse cursor signals.通过匿名化鼠标光标信号进行大规模人群手部震颤分析。
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Sep 24;2:93. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0171-4. eCollection 2019.
10
Digital health: a path to validation.数字健康:验证之路。
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 May 13;2:38. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0111-3. eCollection 2019.