• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哥伦比亚布卡拉曼加成年初级保健患者中使用患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)进行抑郁筛查的有效性。

Validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for depression screening in adult primary care users in Bucaramanga, Colombia.

机构信息

Grupo de investigación Neurociencias, Universidad de Santander (UDES), Bucaramanga, Colombia.

Instituto de Salud de Bucaramanga (ISABU), Hospital local del Norte, Bucaramanga, Colombia.

出版信息

Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed). 2021 Jan-Mar;50(1):11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.rcp.2019.09.001. Epub 2020 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.rcp.2019.09.001
PMID:33648690
Abstract

The patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is one of the most widely used self-report instruments in primary care. There is no criterion validity of the PHQ-9 in Colombia. The objective was to validate the PHQ-9 as a screening tool in primary care. A cross-sectional, scale criterion validity study was performed using as reference criterion the mini neuropsychiatric interview (MINI) in male and female adult users of primary care centres. We calculated the internal consistency and convergent and criterion validity of the PHQ-9 by analysing the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and the area under the curve (AUC). We analysed 243 participants; 184 (75.7%) were female. The average age was 34.05 (median of 31 and SD = 12.47). Cronbach's α was 0.80 and McDonald's ω was 0.81. Spearman's Rho was 0.64 for HADS-D (P <0.010) and 0.70 for PHQ-2 (P <0.010). The AUC was 0.92 (95% CI 0.880-0.963). The optimal cut-off point of PHQ-9 was ≥7: sensitivity of 90.38 (95% CI: 81.41-99.36); specificity of 81.68 (95% CI: 75.93-87.42); PPV 57.32 (95% CI: 46.00-68.63); NPV 96.89 (95% CI: 93.90-99.88); Youden index 0.72 (95% CI: 0.62-0.82); LR+ 4.93 (95% CI: 3.61-6.74); LR- 0.12 (95% CI: 0.005-0.270). In sum, the Colombian version of PHQ-9 is a valid and reliable instrument for depression screening in primary care in Bucaramanga, with a cut-off point ≥7.

摘要

患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)是初级保健中使用最广泛的自我报告工具之一。在哥伦比亚,PHQ-9 没有效标效度。本研究的目的是验证 PHQ-9 在初级保健中作为筛查工具的适用性。采用横断面、量表效标效度研究方法,以男性和女性初级保健中心使用者为研究对象,采用迷你神经精神访谈(MINI)作为参考标准。我们通过分析受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和曲线下面积(AUC),计算 PHQ-9 的内部一致性、收敛性和效标效度。我们分析了 243 名参与者,其中 184 名(75.7%)为女性,平均年龄为 34.05 岁(中位数为 31,标准差为 12.47)。Cronbach's α 为 0.80,McDonald's ω 为 0.81。Spearman's Rho 分别为 0.64(HADS-D,P<0.010)和 0.70(PHQ-2,P<0.010)。AUC 为 0.92(95% CI 0.880-0.963)。PHQ-9 的最佳截断点为≥7:敏感性为 90.38%(95% CI:81.41%-99.36%);特异性为 81.68%(95% CI:75.93%-87.42%);阳性预测值为 57.32%(95% CI:46.00%-68.63%);阴性预测值为 96.89%(95% CI:93.90%-99.88%);约登指数为 0.72(95% CI:0.62%-0.82%);阳性似然比为 4.93(95% CI:3.61%-6.74%);阴性似然比为 0.12(95% CI:0.005%-0.270%)。总之,哥伦比亚版 PHQ-9 是布卡拉曼加初级保健中用于抑郁筛查的有效、可靠的工具,截断点≥7。

相似文献

1
Validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for depression screening in adult primary care users in Bucaramanga, Colombia.哥伦比亚布卡拉曼加成年初级保健患者中使用患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)进行抑郁筛查的有效性。
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed). 2021 Jan-Mar;50(1):11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.rcp.2019.09.001. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
2
Validity of the patient health questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) for the detection of depression in primary care in Colombia.患者健康问卷-2(PHQ-2)在哥伦比亚初级保健中用于检测抑郁的有效性。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Jan 1;278:576-582. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.096. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
3
Validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 to screen for depression in patients with coronary artery disease.医院焦虑抑郁量表及患者健康问卷-9用于筛查冠心病患者抑郁状态的效度
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007 Sep-Oct;29(5):417-24. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.06.005.
4
Reliability and validity of the Thai version of the PHQ-9.泰语版PHQ-9的信度和效度
BMC Psychiatry. 2008 Jun 20;8:46. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-8-46.
5
The Validity and Reliability of the PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 on Screening for Major Depression in Spanish Speaking Immigrants in Chile: A Cross-Sectional Study.《PHQ-9 和 PHQ-2 在智利西班牙语移民中筛查重度抑郁症的有效性和可靠性:一项横断面研究》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;19(21):13975. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113975.
6
The validity and reliability of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for screening depression in primary health care patients in Botswana.博茨瓦纳初级卫生保健患者中患者健康问卷-9 筛查抑郁的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 12;20(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02719-5.
7
Screening for depression in acute coronary syndrome patients: A comparison of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 versus Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression.急性冠状动脉综合征患者的抑郁筛查:患者健康问卷-9 与医院焦虑和抑郁量表-抑郁的比较。
J Psychosom Res. 2019 Jun;121:24-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
8
Validation and calibration of the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) in Argentina.阿根廷患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)的验证和校准。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 18;19(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2262-9.
9
Validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) as a screening tool for depression in pregnant women: Afaan Oromo version.患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)作为孕妇抑郁症筛查工具的有效性验证:阿法尔奥罗莫语版本。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 6;13(2):e0191782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191782. eCollection 2018.
10
Validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in primary care patients in Colombia.医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)在哥伦比亚初级保健患者中的效度。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2022 Jan-Feb;74:102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.01.014. Epub 2021 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating a culturally adapted mental health intervention within entrepreneurship training for displaced youth in Colombia: a pilot randomized controlled trial.在哥伦比亚为流离失所青年开展的创业培训中融入文化适应性心理健康干预:一项试点随机对照试验。
Confl Health. 2025 Jul 31;19(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13031-025-00675-z.
2
Study protocol for a controlled clinical trial on cardiac telerehabilitation and educational follow-up in patients with heart failure.心力衰竭患者心脏远程康复及教育随访的对照临床试验研究方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 10;20(7):e0327366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327366. eCollection 2025.
3
Trajectories of Emotional Exhaustion and Their Contribution to Depression: Optimism as a Buffer in Young People.
情绪耗竭的轨迹及其对抑郁的影响:乐观作为年轻人的缓冲因素
Brain Sci. 2025 Jun 18;15(6):656. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15060656.
4
Risk perception and coping mechanisms by gender identity and education level during the COVID-19 syndemic in Spain.西班牙新冠疫情期间不同性别认同和教育水平人群的风险认知与应对机制
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jun 4;13(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02611-5.
5
Estudio De La Vida Bajo Estres: Methodological Overview and Baseline Data Analysis of a Case-Control Investigation of Risk and Resiliency Factors for Traumatic Stress in Colombia.压力下的生活研究:哥伦比亚创伤应激风险与恢复力因素病例对照调查的方法概述与基线数据分析
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2025;47(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s10862-025-10203-1. Epub 2025 Mar 1.
6
Evaluating the association of depressive symptoms on serum folate and erythrocyte folate levels based on the 2017-2020 NHANES database.基于2017 - 2020年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)数据库评估抑郁症状与血清叶酸和红细胞叶酸水平之间的关联。
Front Nutr. 2025 Feb 10;12:1505700. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1505700. eCollection 2025.
7
Measuring self-reliance and wellbeing among forcibly displaced women enrolled in a gender-focused economic empowerment program: A protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial in Colombia.衡量参与以性别为重点的经济赋权项目的被迫流离失所妇女的自立能力和幸福感:哥伦比亚一项试点随机对照试验方案
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 27;20(1):e0318224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318224. eCollection 2025.
8
Cultural adaptation of an evidence-based intervention to address mental health among youth affected by armed conflict in Colombia: An application of the ADAPT-ITT approach and FRAME-IS reporting protocols.对一种基于证据的干预措施进行文化调适,以解决哥伦比亚受武装冲突影响青年的心理健康问题:ADAPT-ITT方法和FRAME-IS报告协议的应用
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2024 Nov 28;11:e114. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2024.106. eCollection 2024.
9
Comparing implementation strategies for training and supervising nonspecialists in Group Problem Management Plus: A hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial in Colombia.比较“群体问题管理升级版”中针对非专科医生的培训与督导实施策略:哥伦比亚的一项有效性-实施混合试验
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2024 Oct 22;11:e90. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2024.95. eCollection 2024.
10
Social support in recently diagnosed diabetic patients: Risk factor for depression?新诊断糖尿病患者的社会支持:抑郁症的危险因素?
J Public Health Res. 2024 Jun 24;13(2):22799036241262296. doi: 10.1177/22799036241262296. eCollection 2024 Apr.