Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
mBio. 2021 Mar 2;12(2):e03372-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.03372-20.
Antibody therapies such as convalescent plasma and monoclonal antibodies have emerged as major potential therapeutics for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Immunoglobulins differ from conventional antimicrobial agents in that they mediate direct and indirect antimicrobial effects that work in concert with other components of the immune system. The field of infectious diseases pioneered antibody therapies in the first half of the 20th century but largely abandoned them with the arrival of conventional antimicrobial therapy. Consequently, much of the knowledge gained from the historical development and use of immunoglobulins such as serum and convalescent antibody therapies was forgotten; principles and practice governing their use were not taught to new generations of medical practitioners, and further development of this modality stalled. This became apparent during the COVID-19 pandemic in the spring of 2020 when convalescent plasma was initially deployed as salvage therapy in patients with severe disease. In retrospect, this was a stage of disease when it was less likely to be effective. Lessons of the past tell us that antibody therapy is most likely to be effective when used early in respiratory diseases. This article puts forth three principles of antibody therapy, namely, specificity, temporal, and quantitative principles, connoting that antibody efficacy requires the administration of specific antibody, given early in course of disease in sufficient amount. These principles are traced to the history of serum therapy for infectious diseases. The application of the specificity, temporal, and quantitative principles to COVID-19 is discussed in the context of current use of antibody therapy against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
抗体疗法,如恢复期血浆和单克隆抗体,已成为治疗 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的主要潜在疗法。免疫球蛋白与传统的抗菌药物不同,它们介导直接和间接的抗菌作用,与免疫系统的其他成分协同作用。传染病领域在 20 世纪上半叶开创了抗体疗法,但随着传统抗菌疗法的出现,它们在很大程度上被放弃了。因此,从历史上开发和使用免疫球蛋白(如血清和恢复期抗体疗法)中获得的大部分知识被遗忘;其使用的原则和实践没有传授给新一代的医疗从业者,这种治疗模式的进一步发展也停滞不前。这在 2020 年春季 COVID-19 大流行期间变得明显,当时恢复期血浆最初被用作重症患者的挽救性治疗。回想起来,这是疾病不太可能有效的阶段。过去的经验告诉我们,在呼吸道疾病早期使用抗体疗法最有可能有效。本文提出了抗体疗法的三个原则,即特异性、时效性和定量原则,意味着抗体疗效需要给予特定的抗体,并且在疾病早期给予足够的量。这些原则可以追溯到传染病血清疗法的历史。在当前针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)使用抗体疗法的背景下,讨论了将特异性、时效性和定量原则应用于 COVID-19 的情况。