• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Parent-directed intervention versus controls whilst their child waits for diagnostic assessment: a systematic review protocol.家长指导干预与对照组在其孩子等待诊断评估时的比较:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 4;10(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01615-7.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
5
Interventions to improve the mental health of children and young people with long-term physical conditions: linked evidence syntheses.改善患有长期身体状况的儿童和青少年心理健康的干预措施:综合证据的关联分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 May;23(22):1-164. doi: 10.3310/hta23220.
6
Characteristics of effective parent-mediated interventions for parents of children with neurodevelopmental disorders in rural areas: a systematic review protocol.农村地区神经发育障碍儿童父母的有效家长介导干预措施的特征:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 13;14(8):e083464. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083464.
7
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
8
The effectiveness of school-based family asthma educational programs on the quality of life and number of asthma exacerbations of children aged five to 18 years diagnosed with asthma: a systematic review protocol.以学校为基础的家庭哮喘教育项目对5至18岁确诊哮喘儿童生活质量和哮喘发作次数的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):69-81. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2335.
9
Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.干预措施对帮助照顾者支持社区中痴呆症患者的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):137-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00090.x.
10
Cochrane review: behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting programmes for early-onset conduct problems in children aged 3 to 12 years (Review).Cochrane系统评价:基于行为和认知行为的小组育儿计划对3至12岁儿童早期品行问题的影响(综述)
Evid Based Child Health. 2013 Mar 7;8(2):318-692. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1905.

引用本文的文献

1
Access to child developmental assessment services in culturally and linguistically diverse metropolitan Sydney: a retrospective cohort analysis.在文化和语言多样化的悉尼大都市中获得儿童发育评估服务:回顾性队列分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 14;24(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10800-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Review: Attachment and attachment-related outcomes in preschool children - a review of recent evidence.综述:学龄前儿童的依恋及与依恋相关的结果——近期证据综述
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2016 Feb;21(1):11-20. doi: 10.1111/camh.12138. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
2
Patterns of referral and waiting times for specialist Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services.儿童和青少年心理健康专科服务的转诊模式及等待时间
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2018 Feb;23(1):41-49. doi: 10.1111/camh.12207. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
3
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.《可信系统评价的更新指南:干预措施系统评价的新版Cochrane手册》
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10(10):ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142.
4
The dark side of social capital: A systematic review of the negative health effects of social capital.社会资本的阴暗面:社会资本对健康的负面影响的系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Dec;194:105-127. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.020. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
5
Systematic review of pathways for the delivery of allergy services.过敏服务提供途径的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 7;7(2):e012647. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012647.
6
Family social capital and health - a systematic review and redirection.家庭社会资本与健康——一项系统综述与转向
Sociol Health Illn. 2017 Jan;39(1):5-29. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12506. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
7
Associations Between Maternal-Foetal Attachment and Infant Developmental Outcomes: A Systematic Review.母婴依恋与婴儿发育结局之间的关联:一项系统综述。
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Mar;21(3):540-553. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2138-2.
8
Reframing the focus from a family-centred to a child-centred care approach for children's healthcare.将儿童医疗保健的重点从以家庭为中心的护理方法转变为以儿童为中心的护理方法。
J Child Health Care. 2016 Dec;20(4):494-502. doi: 10.1177/1367493516642744. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
9
Parental anxiety related to referral of childhood heart murmur; an observational/interventional study.与儿童心脏杂音转诊相关的家长焦虑;一项观察性/干预性研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2015 Nov 21;15:193. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0507-4.
10
The Impact of Various Parental Mental Disorders on Children's Diagnoses: A Systematic Review.各种父母精神障碍对儿童诊断的影响:一项系统综述。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2015 Dec;18(4):281-99. doi: 10.1007/s10567-015-0191-9.

家长指导干预与对照组在其孩子等待诊断评估时的比较:系统评价方案。

Parent-directed intervention versus controls whilst their child waits for diagnostic assessment: a systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Allied Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 4;10(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01615-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-021-01615-7
PMID:33663597
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7931343/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Waiting lists are an ongoing issue for publicly funded community and hospital-based health services. Parents and caregivers are instrumental supports in the health and well-being of young and school-aged children, yet little is known about the way they can be supported during waiting periods. Given mounting evidence about the value of early intervention in physical and mental health literature, and waits for some public health services extending past 12 months, it is both timely and warranted to explore interim interventions that may be applied in this period.

METHODS

Intervention studies that have applied an educational programme, information, group-based support or individualised therapy to primary caregivers of children (heron referred to as parent-directed interventions), waiting for diagnostic assessment at any inpatient or outpatient health service and aged between 1 and 12 years of age, will be reviewed. These will include intervention studies of any type that have included more than 5 participants or participant groups and where a control or comparison group has been included. Abstract screening, full-text review, data extraction and risk of bias will be conducted by two reviewers. Relevant databases in health and education will be systematically searched using key words and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and grey literature will be explored. Databases will include PubMed, Ovid for MEDLINE and PsycINFO, EBSCO for the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and the Education Resources Information Center (ERIC). Covidence© will be used to support abstract and full text screening, which will be completed by two main reviewers. Results will be tabulated, summarised and meta-analysed using a random-effects model, in any instance where concordant outcome measures have been applied. Results will be published and reported in line with PRISMA reporting guidelines.

DISCUSSION

Given little is known about effective support for families when children are awaiting diagnostic assessment for any medical, developmental or behavioural condition, the authors will synthesise existing evidence about parent-directed interventions in this period. It is hoped that by understanding the existing evidence interventions that are proven to be effective will be adopted and intervention innovation can occur.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020159360.

摘要

背景

公共资助的社区和医院为基础的卫生服务的候诊名单是一个持续存在的问题。家长和照顾者是儿童健康和幸福的重要支持,但对于他们在候诊期间如何得到支持的了解甚少。鉴于越来越多的证据表明早期干预在身心健康文献中的价值,以及一些公共卫生服务的等待时间超过 12 个月,探索在此期间可能应用的临时干预措施是及时且合理的。

方法

将审查应用教育计划、信息、小组支持或个体化治疗给等待任何住院或门诊卫生服务诊断评估的 1 至 12 岁儿童的主要照顾者(下文简称家长指导干预)的干预研究。这些研究将包括任何类型的干预研究,包括超过 5 名参与者或参与者群体,并且包括对照组或比较组。两名评审员将进行摘要筛选、全文审查、数据提取和偏倚风险评估。将使用关键词和医学主题词 (MeSH) 系统地搜索健康和教育相关数据库,并探索灰色文献。数据库将包括 PubMed、Ovid for MEDLINE 和 PsycINFO、EBSCO for 护理和联合健康文献累积索引 (CINAHL),以及教育资源信息中心 (ERIC)。Covidence© 将用于支持摘要和全文筛选,由两名主要评审员完成。在应用一致的结果衡量标准的情况下,将使用随机效应模型对结果进行制表、总结和荟萃分析。结果将按照 PRISMA 报告指南进行发表和报告。

讨论

鉴于当儿童等待任何医疗、发育或行为状况的诊断评估时,对家庭的有效支持知之甚少,作者将综合该时期家长指导干预的现有证据。希望通过了解现有证据,可以采用经过验证的有效干预措施,并进行干预创新。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020159360。