Suppr超能文献

多中心 VIRUS 登记研究中严重 COVID-19 患者接受抗凝治疗的卫生保健差异。

Healthcare disparities among anticoagulation therapies for severe COVID-19 patients in the multi-site VIRUS registry.

机构信息

nference, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Med Virol. 2021 Jul;93(7):4303-4318. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26918. Epub 2021 Mar 30.

Abstract

Here we analyze hospitalized andintensive care unit coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patient outcomes from the international VIRUS registry (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04323787). We find that COVID-19 patients administered unfractionated heparin but not enoxaparin have a higher mortality-rate (390 of 1012 = 39%) compared to patients administered enoxaparin but not unfractionated heparin (270 of 1939 = 14%), presenting a risk ratio of 2.79 (95% confidence interval [CI]: [2.42, 3.16]; p = 4.45e-52). This difference persists even after balancing on a number of covariates including demographics, comorbidities, admission diagnoses, and method of oxygenation, with an increased mortality rate on discharge from the hospital of 37% (268 of 733) for unfractionated heparin versus 22% (154 of 711) for enoxaparin, presenting a risk ratio of 1.69 (95% CI: [1.42, 2.00]; p = 1.5e-8). In these balanced cohorts, a number of complications occurred at an elevated rate for patients administered unfractionated heparin compared to patients administered enoxaparin, including acute kidney injury, acute cardiac injury, septic shock, and anemia. Furthermore, a higher percentage of Black/African American COVID patients (414 of 1294 [32%]) were noted to receive unfractionated heparin compared to White/Caucasian COVID patients (671 of 2644 [25%]), risk ratio 1.26 (95% CI: [1.14, 1.40]; p = 7.5e-5). After balancing upon available clinical covariates, this difference in anticoagulant use remained statistically significant (311 of 1047 [30%] for Black/African American vs. 263 of 1047 [25%] for White/Caucasian, p = .02, risk ratio 1.18; 95% CI: [1.03, 1.36]). While retrospective studies cannot suggest any causality, these findings motivate the need for follow-up prospective research into the observed racial disparity in anticoagulant use and outcomes for severe COVID-19 patients.

摘要

在这里,我们分析了国际 VIRUS 注册中心(https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04323787)中住院和重症监护病房 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的结局。我们发现,与接受依诺肝素治疗但未接受非肝素治疗的 COVID-19 患者(1012 名中的 390 名[39%])相比,接受非肝素治疗但未接受依诺肝素治疗的 COVID-19 患者死亡率更高(1939 名中的 270 名[14%]),风险比为 2.79(95%置信区间[CI]:[2.42,3.16];p=4.45e-52)。即使在平衡了许多协变量后,包括人口统计学、合并症、入院诊断和氧合方法,这种差异仍然存在,与依诺肝素相比,非肝素治疗的出院时死亡率增加了 37%(733 名中的 268 名),风险比为 1.69(95%CI:[1.42,2.00];p=1.5e-8)。在这些平衡队列中,与接受依诺肝素治疗的患者相比,接受非肝素治疗的患者发生多种并发症的比例更高,包括急性肾损伤、急性心脏损伤、感染性休克和贫血。此外,黑人/非裔美国人 COVID 患者(1294 名中的 414 名[32%])比白人/高加索 COVID 患者(2644 名中的 671 名[25%])更有可能接受非肝素治疗,风险比为 1.26(95%CI:[1.14,1.40];p=7.5e-5)。在平衡可用的临床协变量后,这种抗凝剂使用的差异仍然具有统计学意义(黑人/非裔美国人 1047 名中的 311 名[30%]与白人/高加索 1047 名中的 263 名[25%],p=0.02,风险比 1.18;95%CI:[1.03,1.36])。虽然回顾性研究不能表明任何因果关系,但这些发现促使我们需要对严重 COVID-19 患者中观察到的抗凝剂使用和结局的种族差异进行后续前瞻性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9907/8013987/23b1849d59de/JMV-93-4303-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验