• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据预期的预防暴露情况,通过无人机在通用网络结构中分配疫情应对团队和疫苗配送。

Allocating epidemic response teams and vaccine deliveries by drone in generic network structures, according to expected prevented exposures.

机构信息

Department of Logistics, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 5;16(3):e0248053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248053. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0248053
PMID:33667263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7935281/
Abstract

The tumultuous inception of an epidemic is usually accompanied by difficulty in determining how to respond best. In developing nations, this can be compounded by logistical challenges, such as vaccine shortages and poor road infrastructure. To provide guidance towards improved epidemic response, various resource allocation models, in conjunction with a network-based SEIRVD epidemic model, are proposed in this article. Further, the feasibility of using drones for vaccine delivery is evaluated, and assorted relevant parameters are discussed. For the sake of generality, these results are presented for multiple network structures, representing interconnected populations-upon which repeated epidemic simulations are performed. The resource allocation models formulated maximise expected prevented exposures on each day of a simulated epidemic, by allocating response teams and vaccine deliveries according to the solutions of two respective integer programming problems-thereby influencing the simulated epidemic through the SEIRVD model. These models, when compared with a range of alternative resource allocation strategies, were found to reduce both the number of cases per epidemic, and the number of vaccines required. Consequently, the recommendation is made that such models be used as decision support tools in epidemic response. In the absence thereof, prioritizing locations for vaccinations according to susceptible population, rather than total population or number of infections, is most effective for the majority of network types. In other results, fixed-wing drones are demonstrated to be a viable delivery method for vaccines in the context of an epidemic, if sufficient drones can be promptly procured; the detrimental effect of intervention delay was discovered to be significant. In addition, the importance of well-documented routine vaccination activities is highlighted, due to the benefits of increased pre-epidemic immunity rates, and targeted vaccination.

摘要

传染病的爆发通常伴随着如何做出最佳应对的困难。在发展中国家,这可能会因疫苗短缺和道路基础设施差等后勤挑战而更加复杂。为了提供改善传染病应对的指导,本文提出了各种资源分配模型,以及基于网络的 SEIRVD 传染病模型。此外,还评估了使用无人机进行疫苗分发的可行性,并讨论了各种相关参数。为了通用性,针对多个代表相互关联的人群的网络结构呈现了这些结果,在这些网络结构上进行了多次重复的传染病模拟。所制定的资源分配模型通过根据两个各自的整数规划问题的解决方案分配应对小组和疫苗分发,使每个模拟传染病日的预期预防暴露最大化,从而通过 SEIRVD 模型影响模拟传染病。与一系列替代资源分配策略相比,这些模型被发现可以减少每个传染病的病例数和所需疫苗的数量。因此,建议将这些模型用作传染病应对的决策支持工具。在缺乏这些模型的情况下,根据易感人群而不是总人口或感染人数为疫苗接种地点确定优先级,对大多数网络类型最为有效。在其他结果中,如果能够迅速采购到足够数量的固定翼无人机,则证明其是一种可行的传染病疫苗分发方法;干预延迟的不利影响被发现非常显著。此外,还强调了记录良好的常规疫苗接种活动的重要性,因为这可以提高流行前免疫率和针对性疫苗接种的效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/a725d4e693b6/pone.0248053.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/4c4b84e3865e/pone.0248053.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/d00b8552138b/pone.0248053.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/a587f1475dc1/pone.0248053.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/5b1eaff37250/pone.0248053.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/883134059bd2/pone.0248053.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/73a63e158011/pone.0248053.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/edb5568c8ad3/pone.0248053.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/182f960577c1/pone.0248053.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/a1d2892d21af/pone.0248053.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/c5693c22af49/pone.0248053.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/a725d4e693b6/pone.0248053.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/4c4b84e3865e/pone.0248053.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/d00b8552138b/pone.0248053.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/a587f1475dc1/pone.0248053.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/5b1eaff37250/pone.0248053.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/883134059bd2/pone.0248053.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/73a63e158011/pone.0248053.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/edb5568c8ad3/pone.0248053.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/182f960577c1/pone.0248053.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/a1d2892d21af/pone.0248053.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/c5693c22af49/pone.0248053.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b3f/7935281/a725d4e693b6/pone.0248053.g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Allocating epidemic response teams and vaccine deliveries by drone in generic network structures, according to expected prevented exposures.根据预期的预防暴露情况,通过无人机在通用网络结构中分配疫情应对团队和疫苗配送。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 5;16(3):e0248053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248053. eCollection 2021.
2
Optimizing two-dose vaccine resource allocation to combat a pandemic in the context of limited supply: The case of COVID-19.优化两剂疫苗资源分配以应对有限供应情况下的大流行:以 COVID-19 为例。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 24;11:1129183. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1129183. eCollection 2023.
3
Optimal control of vaccination dynamics during an influenza epidemic.流感流行期间疫苗接种动态的最优控制。
Math Biosci Eng. 2014 Oct;11(5):1045-63. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.1045.
4
Optimizing vaccine allocation at different points in time during an epidemic.优化疫情期间不同时间点的疫苗分配。
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 11;5(11):e13767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013767.
5
Emergency vaccination against epidemic meningitis in Ghana: implications for the control of meningococcal disease in West Africa.加纳针对流行性脑膜炎的应急疫苗接种:对西非脑膜炎球菌病控制的影响
Lancet. 2000 Jan 1;355(9197):30-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)03366-8.
6
Using simulated infectious disease outbreaks to inform site selection and sample size for individually randomized vaccine trials during an ongoing epidemic.利用模拟传染病暴发来为正在进行的疫情中的个体随机疫苗试验选择地点和确定样本量提供信息。
Clin Trials. 2021 Oct;18(5):630-638. doi: 10.1177/17407745211028898. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
7
Reactive vaccination in the presence of disease hotspots.在疾病热点地区进行反应性疫苗接种。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jan 7;282(1798):20141341. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1341.
8
Vaccine distribution with drones for less developed countries: A case study in Vanuatu.利用无人机向欠发达国家分发疫苗:瓦努阿图的案例研究。
Vaccine X. 2023 May 15;14:100312. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100312. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Optimal allocation of limited vaccine to control an infectious disease: Simple analytical conditions.有限疫苗控制传染病的最优分配:简单分析条件。
Math Biosci. 2021 Jul;337:108621. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2021.108621. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
10
Tuberculosis结核病

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Feasibility of Drone-Mediated Vaccine Delivery: An Exploratory Study.评估无人机介导疫苗递送的可行性:一项探索性研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 7;8(1):e70208. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70208. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Stochastic rounding: implementation, error analysis and applications.随机舍入:实现、误差分析及应用
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Mar 9;9(3):211631. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211631. eCollection 2022 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Dose-Optimal Vaccine Allocation over Multiple Populations.多人群中剂量优化的疫苗分配
Prod Oper Manag. 2018 Jan;27(1):143-159. doi: 10.1111/poms.12788. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
2
Utilizing general human movement models to predict the spread of emerging infectious diseases in resource poor settings.利用通用人类运动模型预测资源匮乏环境下新发传染病的传播。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 26;9(1):5151. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41192-3.
3
Implementation research: reactive mass vaccination with single-dose oral cholera vaccine, Zambia.实施研究:用一剂口服霍乱疫苗进行反应性大规模疫苗接种,赞比亚。
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Feb 1;96(2):86-93. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.189241. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
4
The basic reproduction number (R) of measles: a systematic review.麻疹基本再生数(R):系统评价。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Dec;17(12):e420-e428. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30307-9. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
5
Optimal vaccine allocation for the early mitigation of pandemic influenza.优化疫苗分配以尽早缓解大流行性流感。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(3):e1002964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002964. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
6
Resource allocation for epidemic control in metapopulations.流行种群的传染病控制资源分配。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024577. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
7
Optimizing vaccine allocation at different points in time during an epidemic.优化疫情期间不同时间点的疫苗分配。
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 11;5(11):e13767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013767.
8
Resource allocation model for public health planning. A case study of tuberculosis control.公共卫生规划的资源分配模型。结核病控制案例研究。
Bull World Health Organ. 1973;48 Suppl:5-110.
9
Optimizing influenza vaccine distribution.优化流感疫苗分配
Science. 2009 Sep 25;325(5948):1705-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1175570. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
10
The effectiveness of prophylaxis for measles contacts in NSW.新南威尔士州麻疹接触者预防措施的有效性。
N S W Public Health Bull. 2009 May-Jun;20(5-6):81-5. doi: 10.1071/NB08014.