Kim Hae Young, Lee Kyeorye, Chang Won, Kim Youngjune, Lee Sungsoo, Oh Dong Yul, Sunwoo Leonard, Lee Yoon Jin, Kim Young Hoon
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13620, Korea.
Interdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Feb 28;11(3):410. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030410.
The performance of deep learning algorithm (DLA) to that of radiologists was compared in detecting low contrast objects in CT phantom images under various imaging conditions. For training, 10,000 images were created using American College of Radiology CT phantom as the background. In half of the images, objects of 3-20 mm size and 5-30 HU contrast difference were generated in random locations. Binary responses were used as the ground truth. For testing, 640 images of Catphan phantom were used, half of which had objects of either 5 or 9 mm size with 10 HU contrast difference. Twelve radiologists evaluated the presence of objects on a five-point scale. The performances of the DLA and radiologists were compared across different imaging conditions in terms of area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). Multi-reader multi-case AUC and Hanley and McNeil tests were used. We performed post-hoc analysis using bootstrapping and verified that the DLA is less affected by the changing imaging conditions. The AUC of DLA was consistently higher than those of the radiologists across different imaging conditions ( < 0.0001), and it was less affected by varying imaging conditions. The DLA outperformed the radiologists and showed more robust performance under varying imaging conditions.
在各种成像条件下,比较了深度学习算法(DLA)与放射科医生在CT体模图像中检测低对比度物体的性能。为了进行训练,以美国放射学会CT体模为背景创建了10000张图像。在一半的图像中,在随机位置生成了尺寸为3-20毫米、对比度差异为5-30HU的物体。二元响应用作基本事实。为了进行测试,使用了640张Catphan体模图像,其中一半有尺寸为5或9毫米、对比度差异为10HU的物体。12名放射科医生用五点量表评估物体的存在情况。根据接收器操作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积,在不同成像条件下比较了DLA和放射科医生的性能。使用了多读者多病例AUC和Hanley及McNeil检验。我们使用自展法进行事后分析,并验证了DLA受成像条件变化的影响较小。在不同成像条件下,DLA的AUC始终高于放射科医生(<0.0001),并且受成像条件变化的影响较小。DLA的表现优于放射科医生,并且在不同成像条件下表现出更强的鲁棒性。