KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Gerontologist. 2022 Mar 28;62(3):324-331. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab026.
Limited uptake and use of developed technologies by older adults have prompted interest in participatory design and related approaches in the gerotechnology field. Despite this, recent systematic reviews suggest that researchers continue to passively engage older adults in research projects, often only providing advice or feedback in the early or later phases of research. A key barrier to more meaningful and active engagement of older adults is a lack of understanding as to how participatory design differs from other participatory approaches, and in particular, participatory action research. We address this gap in understanding by exploring the theoretical similarities and differences of participatory design and participatory action research, including their scope, goals, and the nature of the involvement of older adults in each. We conclude with key barriers that are critical to address in order to achieve greater involvement of older adults in gerotechnology and to broaden and enrich the goals of this field.
由于老年人对已开发技术的接受程度和使用程度有限,参与式设计和相关方法在老年技术领域引起了关注。尽管如此,最近的系统评价表明,研究人员仍然在被动地让老年人参与研究项目,通常只是在研究的早期或后期阶段提供建议或反馈。更有意义和积极地让老年人参与的一个关键障碍是,他们不了解参与式设计与其他参与式方法(特别是参与式行动研究)有何不同。我们通过探讨参与式设计和参与式行动研究的理论相似点和不同点来解决这一理解上的差距,包括它们的范围、目标以及老年人在其中的参与性质。最后,我们总结了实现老年人更广泛地参与老年技术并拓宽和丰富该领域目标的关键障碍。