Suppr超能文献

评估双相情感障碍抑郁患者的 MADRS 严重程度阈值。

Evaluation of MADRS severity thresholds in patients with bipolar depression.

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

AbbVie, Irvine, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2021 May 1;286:58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.043. Epub 2021 Feb 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is commonly used to assess depression symptom changes in clinical trials; however, the score itself can be difficult to interpret without clinical context. Categories of depression severity corresponding to MADRS total score have not been established for bipolar depression, which was the objective of this study.

METHODS

Data were pooled from 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of cariprazine in patients with bipolar I depression; placebo and cariprazine arms were pooled. An anchor-based approach was used to map MADRS total score to the clinician-rated, 7-category Clinical Global Impression of Severity scale (CGI-S). Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to assess associations between MADRS total and CGI-S scores. Optimal MADRS severity thresholds for each CGI-S category was determined via Youden index using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses.

RESULTS

Using data from 1523 patients with bipolar depression, mean MADRS total scores were positively correlated with mean CGI-S scores at week 6 (r = 0.87; P<.0001). Using ROC curves, MADRS severity thresholds corresponding to each CGI-S category were estimated with high sensitivity and specificity: 0-6 for "normal, not at all ill", 7-12 for "borderline mentally ill", 13-18 for "mildly ill", 19-23 for "moderately ill", 24-36 for "markedly ill", 37-39 for "severely ill", and ≥40 for "extremely ill".

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing data from 3 clinical trials of patients with bipolar depression, MADRS severity thresholds were identified. These empirical findings may help clinicians contextualize MADRS results from bipolar clinical research and apply to their practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov NCT01396447, NCT02670538, NCT02670551.

摘要

背景

蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)常用于评估临床试验中的抑郁症状变化;然而,如果没有临床背景,评分本身可能难以解释。尚未为双相抑郁确立与 MADRS 总分相对应的抑郁严重程度类别,这是本研究的目的。

方法

汇总了 3 项卡利拉嗪治疗双相 I 型抑郁症的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验的数据;汇总了安慰剂和卡利拉嗪组的数据。采用基于锚定的方法将 MADRS 总分映射到临床医生评定的 7 类临床总体印象严重程度量表(CGI-S)。使用 Spearman 相关系数评估 MADRS 总分与 CGI-S 评分之间的相关性。通过接收者操作特征(ROC)分析使用约登指数确定每个 CGI-S 类别下 MADRS 严重程度的最佳阈值。

结果

使用来自 1523 例双相抑郁症患者的数据,MADRS 总分在第 6 周与 CGI-S 总分呈正相关(r=0.87;P<.0001)。使用 ROC 曲线,估计了与每个 CGI-S 类别相对应的 MADRS 严重程度阈值,具有较高的敏感性和特异性:0-6 为“正常,一点也不病”,7-12 为“边缘性精神病”,13-18 为“轻度病”,19-23 为“中度病”,24-36 为“明显病”,37-39 为“重病”,≥40 为“极重病”。

结论

利用来自 3 项双相抑郁症患者临床试验的数据,确定了 MADRS 严重程度的阈值。这些实证发现可能有助于临床医生从双相临床研究中理解 MADRS 结果,并将其应用于实践。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov NCT01396447,NCT02670538,NCT02670551。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验