• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测试组合选择中的基因活性谱和模式识别

Genetic activity profiles and pattern recognition in test battery selection.

作者信息

Waters M D, Stack H F, Rabinowitz J R, Garrett N E

机构信息

Genetic Toxicology Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.

出版信息

Mutat Res. 1988 May-Aug;205(1-4):119-38. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(88)90015-8.

DOI:10.1016/0165-1218(88)90015-8
PMID:3367918
Abstract

Computer-generated genetic activity profiles and pairwise matching procedures may aid in the selection of the most appropriate short-term bioassays to be used in test batteries for the evaluation of the genotoxicity of a given chemical or group of chemicals. Selection of test batteries would be based on a quantitative comparative assessment of the past performance of similar tests applied to other chemicals of the same structural group. The information potentially available for test-battery selection through the use of this pattern-recognition technique is considerably greater than the qualitative results obtained from individual short-term tests. Application of the method should further our understanding of the relationships between chemical properties and genotoxic responses obtained in short-term bioassays and also may contribute to our knowledge of the mechanisms of complex processes such as carcinogenesis. This approach to battery selection should be augmented by careful consideration of established principles of genetic toxicity testing; that is, a chemical should be evaluated in a battery of tests representing the full range of relevant genetic endpoints.

摘要

计算机生成的遗传活性图谱和成对匹配程序,可能有助于选择最合适的短期生物测定方法,用于测试组合中评估特定化学物质或一组化学物质的遗传毒性。测试组合的选择将基于对应用于同一结构组其他化学物质的类似测试过去表现的定量比较评估。通过使用这种模式识别技术,潜在可用于测试组合选择的信息,远多于从单个短期测试获得的定性结果。该方法的应用应能增进我们对化学性质与短期生物测定中获得的遗传毒性反应之间关系的理解,也可能有助于我们了解诸如致癌作用等复杂过程的机制。这种测试组合选择方法,应通过仔细考虑遗传毒性测试的既定原则加以补充;也就是说,一种化学物质应在代表所有相关遗传终点的一系列测试中进行评估。

相似文献

1
Genetic activity profiles and pattern recognition in test battery selection.测试组合选择中的基因活性谱和模式识别
Mutat Res. 1988 May-Aug;205(1-4):119-38. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(88)90015-8.
2
Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.一组三项体外遗传毒性试验鉴别啮齿动物致癌物和非致癌物能力的评估I. 敏感性、特异性和相对预测性
Mutat Res. 2005 Jul 4;584(1-2):1-256. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.02.004.
3
Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing.遗传毒性测试策略:与体外测试相关的危害识别和风险评估
Mutat Res. 2007 Feb 3;627(1):41-58. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.10.003. Epub 2006 Nov 27.
4
An approach to identifying specialized batteries of bioassays for specific classes of chemicals: class analysis using mutagenicity and carcinogenicity relationships and phylogenetic concordance and discordance patterns. 1. Composition and analysis of the overall data base. A report of phase II of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program.一种识别特定化学物质类别的生物测定专门组合的方法:利用致突变性和致癌性的关系以及系统发育一致性和不一致性模式进行类别分析。1. 总体数据库的组成与分析。美国环境保护局基因毒性计划第二阶段报告
Mutat Res. 1987 May;185(3):197-241. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(87)90018-2.
5
The prospects for a simplified and internationally harmonized approach to the detection of possible human carcinogens and mutagens.采用简化且国际统一的方法来检测潜在人类致癌物和诱变剂的前景。
Mutagenesis. 1986 Jan;1(1):3-16. doi: 10.1093/mutage/1.1.3.
6
Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes.致突变性和遗传毒理学中的测试策略:对欧洲化妆品和非食品产品科学委员会染发剂评估指南的评价。
Mutat Res. 2005 Dec 30;588(2):88-105. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.09.006. Epub 2005 Dec 2.
7
The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.果蝇检测结果作为接触致癌物指标的情况。
IARC Sci Publ. 1999(146):427-70.
8
The genetic toxicology of Gene-Tox non-carcinogens.
Mutat Res. 1988 May-Aug;205(1-4):139-82. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(88)90016-x.
9
The mouse spot test. Evaluation of its performance in identifying chemical mutagens and carcinogens.小鼠斑点试验。评估其在鉴定化学诱变剂和致癌物方面的性能。
Mutat Res. 1985 Nov;154(3):183-204. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(85)90017-x.
10
Evaluation of genotoxic effects of surface waters using a battery of bioassays indicating different mode of action.采用一系列指示不同作用模式的生物测定法评估地表水的遗传毒性效应。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016 Nov;133:448-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.07.022. Epub 2016 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Human exposures to mutagens--an analysis using the genetic activity profile database.人类接触诱变剂——基于遗传活性谱数据库的分析
Environ Health Perspect. 1996 May;104 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):585-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104s3585.
2
Characteristics of the U.S. EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs' toxicity information databases.美国环境保护局农药项目办公室毒性信息数据库的特点。
Environ Health Perspect. 1991 Dec;96:53-6. doi: 10.1289/ehp.919653.
3
The Genetic Activity Profile database.基因活性谱数据库。
Environ Health Perspect. 1991 Dec;96:41-5. doi: 10.1289/ehp.919641.