Milesi Patrizia, Alberici Augusta Isabella
Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.
Eur J Psychol. 2019 Sep 27;15(3):459-478. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v15i3.1557. eCollection 2019 Sep.
This paper explores how female politicians discursively construct their intersectional identity as "women politicians." We interviewed 10 female politicians in charge of local political offices and examined how they talked about the boundaries and contents of their "women politicians" identity. When talking about identity boundaries, the interviewees first presented "women politicians" as an exclusive minority within their gender group. Second, they constructed intergroup categorizations by comparing women who meet the requirements to enter politics versus women who do not. When talking about identity contents, the interviewees constructed intergroup categorizations along the ideological axis only. Thus, they overlooked the differences between men and women who share the same ideology while they enhanced the differences among women of different ideologies. Overall, the interviewees constructed their "women politicians" identity as a subordinate identity within their overarching ideological identity rather than as a real intersectional identity. These results are discussed also in terms of discursive de-politicization of the "women politicians" intersectional identity.
本文探讨了女性政治家如何通过话语构建她们作为“女政治家”的交叉身份。我们采访了10位负责地方政治职务的女性政治家,并研究了她们如何谈论其“女政治家”身份的界限和内容。在谈论身份界限时,受访者首先将“女政治家”呈现为其性别群体中的一个排他性少数群体。其次,她们通过比较符合从政要求的女性与不符合要求的女性来构建群体间的分类。在谈论身份内容时,受访者仅沿着意识形态轴构建群体间的分类。因此,她们忽视了具有相同意识形态的男性和女性之间的差异,同时强化了不同意识形态女性之间的差异。总体而言,受访者将她们的“女政治家”身份构建为其总体意识形态身份中的从属身份,而非真正的交叉身份。这些结果也从“女政治家”交叉身份的话语去政治化角度进行了讨论。