Caputo Andrea
Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Eur J Psychol. 2020 Aug 31;16(3):418-436. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v16i3.2213. eCollection 2020 Aug.
The aim of the present manuscript is to test and compare the theory of reasoned action (TRA), theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and prototype-willingness model (PWM) in predicting risky alcohol consumption among adolescents and to build an integrative model to get a more comprehensive understanding of such risky behaviour. A total sample of 518 adolescents (55% females; 13-19 aged) recruited from Italian schools (7th to 12th grade) participated in a cross-sectional research study and completed an online questionnaire. Risky alcohol use assessed through the AUDIT-C was the dependent variable; whereas, variables from the TRA, TPB, and PWM (i.e. attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, intention, prototype favourability and similarity, and willingness to alcohol use) were used as predictors. Data were analysed using structural equation modelling (SEM). The findings show that the integrative model had greater explanatory power and provided a better fit to the data, compared to the TRA, TPB, and PWM, indicating attitudes and subjective norms as the best predictors. In conclusion, perceived social approval from significant others and the volitional component have a central role in understanding adolescents' alcohol consumption.
本论文的目的是检验和比较理性行动理论(TRA)、计划行为理论(TPB)和原型意愿模型(PWM)在预测青少年危险饮酒行为方面的效果,并构建一个整合模型,以更全面地理解此类危险行为。从意大利学校(7至12年级)招募的518名青少年(55%为女性;年龄在13至19岁之间)组成的总样本参与了一项横断面研究,并完成了一份在线问卷。通过酒精使用障碍识别测试简表(AUDIT-C)评估的危险饮酒行为是因变量;而TRA、TPB和PWM的变量(即态度、主观规范、感知行为控制、意图、原型好感度和相似度以及饮酒意愿)则用作预测变量。数据采用结构方程模型(SEM)进行分析。研究结果表明,与TRA、TPB和PWM相比,整合模型具有更强的解释力,与数据的拟合度更好,表明态度和主观规范是最佳预测因素。总之,来自重要他人的感知社会认可和意志成分在理解青少年饮酒行为中起着核心作用。