Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 大流行期间临床实习的替代方法:在线模拟门诊和住院患者临床实践-混合方法。

Alternative approaches for clinical clerkship during the COVID-19 pandemic: online simulated clinical practice for inpatients and outpatients-A mixed method.

机构信息

Health Professional Development Center, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Department of Respirology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2021 Mar 8;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02586-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has created a need for educational materials and methods that can replace clinical clerkships (CCs) for online simulated clinical practice (online-sCP). This study evaluates the impact of using simulated electronic health records (sEHR) for inpatients, and electronic problem-based learning (e-PBL) and online virtual medical interviews (online-VMI) for outpatients, for an online-sCP using a learning management system (LMS) and online meeting system facilitated by a supervising physician.

METHODS

The sEHR was reviewed by medical students and subsequently discussed with a supervising physician using an online meeting system. In the e-PBL, medical students reviewed the simulated patients and discussed on the LMS. For the online-VMI, a faculty member acted as an outpatient and a student acted as the doctor. Small groups of students discussed the clinical reasoning process using the online meeting system. A mixed-method design was implemented. Medical students self-assessed their clinical competence before and after the online-sCP. They answered questionnaires and participated in semi-structured focus group interviews (FGIs) regarding the advantages and disadvantages of the practice.

RESULTS

Forty-three students completed the online-sCP during May and June 2020. All students indicated significant improvement in all aspects of self-evaluation of clinical performance after the online-sCP. Students using sEHR reported significant improvement in writing daily medical records and medical summaries. Students using e-PBL and online-VMI reported significant improvement in medical interviews and counseling. Students also indicated CCs as more useful for learning associated with medical interviews, physical examinations, and humanistic qualities like professionalism than the online-sCP. Eight FGIs were conducted (n = 42). The advantages of online-sCP were segregated into five categories (learning environment, efficiency, accessibility, self-paced learning, and interactivity); meanwhile, the disadvantages of online-sCP were classified into seven categories (clinical practice experience, learning environment, interactivity, motivation, memory retention, accessibility, and extraneous cognitive load).

CONCLUSIONS

Online-sCP with sEHR, e-PBL, and online-VMI could be useful in learning some of the clinical skills acquired through CC. These methods can be implemented with limited preparation and resources.

摘要

背景

COVID-19 大流行需要教育材料和方法,以替代临床实习(CC)进行在线模拟临床实践(online-sCP)。本研究评估了使用模拟电子健康记录(sEHR)进行住院患者,以及电子基于问题的学习(e-PBL)和在线虚拟医疗访谈(online-VMI)进行门诊患者的在线-sCP 的效果,该在线-sCP 使用学习管理系统(LMS)和在线会议系统,由主管医师提供支持。

方法

学生审查 sEHR,然后使用在线会议系统与主管医师讨论。在 e-PBL 中,学生复习模拟患者并在 LMS 上进行讨论。在 online-VMI 中,一名教员担任门诊医生,一名学生担任医生。学生小组使用在线会议系统讨论临床推理过程。采用混合方法设计。医学生在在线-sCP 前后自我评估临床能力。他们回答问卷并参加半结构化焦点小组访谈(FGI),讨论实践的优缺点。

结果

2020 年 5 月至 6 月,43 名学生完成了在线-sCP。所有学生表示,在线-sCP 后,他们在自我评估的所有临床表现方面都有显著提高。使用 sEHR 的学生表示在书写日常病历和医疗总结方面有显著提高。使用 e-PBL 和 online-VMI 的学生表示在医疗访谈和咨询方面有显著提高。学生还表示,与在线-sCP 相比,CC 更有助于学习与医疗访谈、体检和专业精神等人文素质相关的内容。进行了 8 次 FGI(n=42)。在线-sCP 的优势分为五个类别(学习环境、效率、可访问性、自主学习和交互性);同时,在线-sCP 的缺点分为七个类别(临床实践经验、学习环境、交互性、动机、记忆保留、可访问性和额外认知负荷)。

结论

使用 sEHR、e-PBL 和 online-VMI 的在线-sCP 可以帮助学习一些通过 CC 获得的临床技能。这些方法可以在有限的准备和资源下实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4520/7938574/55130422c955/12909_2021_2586_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验