Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Room 519, Jockey Club Tower, Centennial Campus, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Department of Social Work, Hong Kong Baptist University, Room DLB725, 15 Baptist University Road, Baptist University Road Campus, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Nov 11;36(10):1613-1624. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab115.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has triggered an unprecedented number of policy responses around the world across multiple policy domains. While governments have combined containment and health policies with social policies (CHSPs) during the initial phase of the pandemic in various ways, the current literature offers little knowledge of the patterns of these combinations and their determinants and outcomes. This paper fills this gap by investigating CHSP combinations across ≥120 countries. We further examined whether the CHSP response was determined by political regimes or compensation hypotheses-serving the purposes of responding to pre-existing economic downturns, inequality or social unrest. We also investigated the associations between CHSP responses and mobility, virus infection and unemployment. Using policy data from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker, results from sequence analysis indicated that governments' CHSP responses could be clustered into five categories: high social policies (SPs), middle SPs, containment and health (CH) leading SPs, low SPs and gradual high SPs. We used multinomial regression models to investigate determinants of CHSP responses. We found that CHSP responses did not differ by political regimes, and CHSP combinations were not driven by compensation hypotheses. Instead, gross domestic product per capita and government effectiveness were the key drivers for high levels of policy responses. We also found that low SP responses were associated with fewer mobility changes. Taken together, our findings suggest that lower-income countries required more support and resources in order for them to adopt necessary CH and SP responses.
2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行在全球多个政策领域引发了前所未有的政策应对措施。虽然各国政府在大流行的初始阶段以各种方式将遏制和卫生政策与社会政策(CHSPs)相结合,但目前的文献几乎没有关于这些组合的模式及其决定因素和结果的知识。本文通过调查≥120 个国家的 CHSP 组合填补了这一空白。我们还进一步研究了 CHSP 反应是否由政治制度或补偿假说决定——为应对先前的经济衰退、不平等或社会动荡服务。我们还调查了 CHSP 反应与流动性、病毒感染和失业之间的关联。使用牛津 COVID-19 政府反应追踪器中的政策数据,序列分析的结果表明,政府的 CHSP 反应可以聚类为五类:高社会政策(SPs)、中 SPs、遏制和卫生(CH)主导 SPs、低 SPs 和逐渐高 SPs。我们使用多项回归模型研究 CHSP 反应的决定因素。我们发现 CHSP 反应不因政治制度而异,CHSP 组合也不受补偿假说的驱动。相反,人均国内生产总值和政府效能是政策反应高度的关键驱动因素。我们还发现,低 SP 反应与较少的流动性变化有关。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,低收入国家需要更多的支持和资源,以便采取必要的 CH 和 SP 反应。