• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《COVID-19 时期的遏制、健康和社会政策——120 个国家初始应对措施的决定因素和结果》

Containment, Health, and Social Policies in the Time of COVID-19 - Determinants and Outcomes of Initial Responses across 120 Countries.

机构信息

Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Room 519, Jockey Club Tower, Centennial Campus, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Department of Social Work, Hong Kong Baptist University, Room DLB725, 15 Baptist University Road, Baptist University Road Campus, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2021 Nov 11;36(10):1613-1624. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab115.

DOI:10.1093/heapol/czab115
PMID:34536271
Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has triggered an unprecedented number of policy responses around the world across multiple policy domains. While governments have combined containment and health policies with social policies (CHSPs) during the initial phase of the pandemic in various ways, the current literature offers little knowledge of the patterns of these combinations and their determinants and outcomes. This paper fills this gap by investigating CHSP combinations across ≥120 countries. We further examined whether the CHSP response was determined by political regimes or compensation hypotheses-serving the purposes of responding to pre-existing economic downturns, inequality or social unrest. We also investigated the associations between CHSP responses and mobility, virus infection and unemployment. Using policy data from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker, results from sequence analysis indicated that governments' CHSP responses could be clustered into five categories: high social policies (SPs), middle SPs, containment and health (CH) leading SPs, low SPs and gradual high SPs. We used multinomial regression models to investigate determinants of CHSP responses. We found that CHSP responses did not differ by political regimes, and CHSP combinations were not driven by compensation hypotheses. Instead, gross domestic product per capita and government effectiveness were the key drivers for high levels of policy responses. We also found that low SP responses were associated with fewer mobility changes. Taken together, our findings suggest that lower-income countries required more support and resources in order for them to adopt necessary CH and SP responses.

摘要

2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行在全球多个政策领域引发了前所未有的政策应对措施。虽然各国政府在大流行的初始阶段以各种方式将遏制和卫生政策与社会政策(CHSPs)相结合,但目前的文献几乎没有关于这些组合的模式及其决定因素和结果的知识。本文通过调查≥120 个国家的 CHSP 组合填补了这一空白。我们还进一步研究了 CHSP 反应是否由政治制度或补偿假说决定——为应对先前的经济衰退、不平等或社会动荡服务。我们还调查了 CHSP 反应与流动性、病毒感染和失业之间的关联。使用牛津 COVID-19 政府反应追踪器中的政策数据,序列分析的结果表明,政府的 CHSP 反应可以聚类为五类:高社会政策(SPs)、中 SPs、遏制和卫生(CH)主导 SPs、低 SPs 和逐渐高 SPs。我们使用多项回归模型研究 CHSP 反应的决定因素。我们发现 CHSP 反应不因政治制度而异,CHSP 组合也不受补偿假说的驱动。相反,人均国内生产总值和政府效能是政策反应高度的关键驱动因素。我们还发现,低 SP 反应与较少的流动性变化有关。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,低收入国家需要更多的支持和资源,以便采取必要的 CH 和 SP 反应。

相似文献

1
Containment, Health, and Social Policies in the Time of COVID-19 - Determinants and Outcomes of Initial Responses across 120 Countries.《COVID-19 时期的遏制、健康和社会政策——120 个国家初始应对措施的决定因素和结果》
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Nov 11;36(10):1613-1624. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab115.
2
What factors drive the satisfaction of citizens with governments' responses to COVID-19?哪些因素驱动公民对政府应对 COVID-19 措施的满意度?
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;102:327-331. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.050. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
3
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).一个全球性的大流行病政策面板数据库(牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
Do government responses impact the relationship between age, gender and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic? A comparison across 27 European countries.政府的应对措施是否会影响 COVID-19 大流行期间年龄、性别和心理困扰之间的关系?对 27 个欧洲国家的比较。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114583. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114583. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
5
Public health matters: why is Latin America struggling in addressing the pandemic?公共卫生事务:为何拉丁美洲在应对大流行方面举步维艰?
J Public Health Policy. 2021 Mar;42(1):27-40. doi: 10.1057/s41271-020-00269-4. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
6
The effectiveness of national-level containment and closure policies across income levels during the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of 113 countries.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,不同收入水平国家层面的遏制和关闭政策的效果:对 113 个国家的分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Aug 12;36(7):1152-1162. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab054.
7
Effects of strict containment policies on COVID-19 pandemic crisis: lessons to cope with next pandemic impacts.严格封控政策对 COVID-19 大流行危机的影响:应对下一次大流行影响的经验教训。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(1):2020-2028. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22024-w. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
8
Policy stringency and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal analysis of data from 15 countries.政策严格程度与新冠大流行期间的心理健康:来自 15 个国家的纵向数据分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 May;7(5):e417-e426. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00060-3. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
9
Effects of government policies on the spread of COVID-19 worldwide.政府政策对全球 COVID-19 传播的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 14;11(1):20495. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99368-9.
10
The comparative politics of COVID-19: The need to understand government responses.新冠疫情下的比较政治学:理解政府应对措施的必要性。
Glob Public Health. 2020 Sep;15(9):1413-1416. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1783340. Epub 2020 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Good democratic governance can combat COVID-19 - excess mortality analysis.良好的民主治理能够抗击新冠疫情——超额死亡率分析
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022 Dec;83:103437. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103437. Epub 2022 Nov 12.