Xu Xinyue, An Fei, Wu Shengjun, Wang Hui, Kang Qi, Wang Ying, Zhu Ting, Zhang Bing, Huang Wei, Liu Xufeng, Wang Xiuchao
Department of Military Medical Psychology, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Department of Clinical Psychology, Dongguan Seventh People's Hospital, Dongguan, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 26;15:1309501. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1309501. eCollection 2024.
Emotional words are often used as stimulus material to explore the cognitive and emotional characteristics of individuals with depressive disorder, while normal individuals mostly rate the scores of affective words. Given that individuals with depressive disorder exhibit a negative cognitive bias, it is possible that their depressive state could influence the ratings of affective words. To enhance the validity of the stimulus material, we specifically recruited patients with depression to provide these ratings.
This study provided subjective ratings for 501 Chinese affective norms, incorporating 167 negative words selected from depressive disorder patients' Sino Weibo blogs, and 167 neutral words and 167 positive words selected from the Chinese Affective Word System. The norms are based on the assessments made by 91 patients with depressive disorder and 92 normal individuals, by using the paper-and-pencil quiz on a 9-point scale.
Regardless of the group, the results show high reliability and validity. We identified group differences in three dimensions: valence, arousal, and self-relevance: the depression group rated negative words higher, but positive and neutral words lower than the normal control group.
The emotional perception affected the individual's perception of words, to some extent, this database expanded the ratings and provided a reference for exploring norms for individuals with different emotional states.
情感词汇常被用作刺激材料,以探究抑郁症患者的认知和情感特征,而正常个体大多对情感词汇进行评分。鉴于抑郁症患者表现出负面认知偏差,他们的抑郁状态有可能影响情感词汇的评分。为提高刺激材料的有效性,我们专门招募了抑郁症患者来提供这些评分。
本研究对501个中文情感常模进行了主观评分,其中包括从抑郁症患者的新浪微博博客中选取的167个负面词汇,以及从中文情感词汇系统中选取的167个中性词汇和167个正面词汇。这些常模基于91名抑郁症患者和92名正常个体的评估,采用纸笔测验,以9分制进行评分。
无论在哪一组,结果都显示出高信度和效度。我们在效价、唤醒度和自我相关性这三个维度上发现了组间差异:抑郁症组对负面词汇的评分更高,但对正面和中性词汇的评分低于正常对照组。
情绪感知在一定程度上影响了个体对词汇的感知,这个数据库扩展了评分范围,并为探索不同情绪状态个体的常模提供了参考。