• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施同伴反思以提高医学生国家考试重考者的成绩。

The Implementation of Peer-Reflection to Improve Retakers' Achievement in National Medical Students Examination.

作者信息

Hanafi Muchtar, Randita Amandha Boy Timor, Ardyanto Tonang Dwi

机构信息

Medical Education and Research Center, Teaching Hospital of Universitas Sebelas Maret, Sukoharjo, Indonesia.

Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia.

出版信息

Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021 Mar 3;12:229-235. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S282400. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S282400
PMID:33692644
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7938424/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Faculty of medicine plays a role to support the students' success in passing national exit exam through mentorship. Peer-reflection evaluates the students' learning process. We aimed to analyze the impact of peer-reflection to change the students' learning attitude and improve national exam score.

METHODS

Nine test-retaker students participated in mentorship program for three months. They took two parts of faculty-level examination. After the 1st and the 2nd part of faculty exam, there were peer-reflections I and II that argued about the characters, strengths and weaknesses, suggestions. Then, they did self-reflection to conduct responses about the mentorship including the impact of peers' input and finally took national exam. The examination score before and after peer-reflection were compared. We analyzed the statement of reflection by documents and content analysis. The progress of examination score was analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

The students objectively understood the strengths and weaknesses of their way of learning, and then implemented the peers' advices. Peer-reflection method provided a feeling of same purpose, then developed ways of learning that promoted them to be higher motivated. Finally, 6 of 9 students passed the exam.

DISCUSSION

Suggestions given by peers would be memorable and powerfully changed motivation. Peer-reflection explored non-academic problems that determined the pattern and the way of how students learned.

摘要

引言

医学院通过指导来帮助学生成功通过国家结业考试。同伴反思评估学生的学习过程。我们旨在分析同伴反思对改变学生学习态度和提高国家考试成绩的影响。

方法

九名重考学生参加了为期三个月的指导计划。他们参加了两部分的学院级考试。在学院考试的第一部分和第二部分之后,分别进行了同伴反思一和同伴反思二,讨论了性格、优点和缺点以及建议。然后,他们进行自我反思,以回应关于指导的内容,包括同伴意见的影响,最后参加国家考试。比较了同伴反思前后的考试成绩。我们通过文献和内容分析来分析反思陈述。对考试成绩的进步进行了描述性分析。

结果

学生客观地了解了自己学习方式的优点和缺点,然后采纳了同伴的建议。同伴反思方法提供了一种目标一致的感觉,进而形成了促进他们更有动力的学习方式。最后,9名学生中有6名通过了考试。

讨论

同伴给出的建议会令人难忘,并有力地改变动力。同伴反思探讨了决定学生学习模式和方式的非学术问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ab4/7938424/4ad2aed010c5/AMEP-12-229-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ab4/7938424/b1a22c92326a/AMEP-12-229-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ab4/7938424/41bdc10560fe/AMEP-12-229-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ab4/7938424/4ad2aed010c5/AMEP-12-229-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ab4/7938424/b1a22c92326a/AMEP-12-229-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ab4/7938424/41bdc10560fe/AMEP-12-229-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ab4/7938424/4ad2aed010c5/AMEP-12-229-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Implementation of Peer-Reflection to Improve Retakers' Achievement in National Medical Students Examination.实施同伴反思以提高医学生国家考试重考者的成绩。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021 Mar 3;12:229-235. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S282400. eCollection 2021.
2
Is Reflective Learning Visible in Online Discussion Forums for Medical Students on General Practice Placements? A Qualitative Study.医学生在普通科实习中在线讨论论坛上的反思学习是否可见?一项定性研究。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Aug-Sep;32(4):434-441. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1730184. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
3
Analysis of a Near Peer Tutoring Program to Improve Medical Students' Note Writing Skills.浅析以同伴互教模式提升医学生笔记技能
Teach Learn Med. 2022 Aug-Sep;34(4):425-433. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1730182. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
4
The Role of Self- and Peer Assessment in Dental Students' Reflective Practice Using Standardized Patient Encounters.自我评估和同伴评估在牙科学生使用标准化患者问诊进行反思性实践中的作用。
J Dent Educ. 2016 Aug;80(8):924-9.
5
Integrating students' reflection-in-learning and examination performance as a method for providing educational feedback.整合学生学习中的反思与考试成绩作为提供教育反馈的一种方法。
J Postgrad Med. 2012 Oct-Dec;58(4):270-4. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.105447.
6
Reflective teaching of medical communication skills with DiViDU: assessing the level of student reflection on recorded consultations with simulated patients.使用DiViDU进行医学沟通技能的反思性教学:评估学生对与模拟患者的会诊记录的反思水平。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Feb;74(2):142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.10.009. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
7
Near-peer role modeling: Can fourth-year medical students, recognized for their humanism, enhance reflection among second-year students in a physical diagnosis course?近龄榜样示范:以人文精神著称的四年级医学生能否增强二年级学生在物理诊断课程中的反思能力?
Med Educ Online. 2016 Sep 2;21:31940. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.31940. eCollection 2016.
8
Peer assisted feedback: a successful approach for providing feedback on United States Medical Licensing Exam-style clinical skills exam notes in the United States.同伴辅助反馈:在美国为美国医师执照考试风格的临床技能考试笔记提供反馈的一种成功方法。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:29. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.29. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
9
Fostering Dental Students' Academic Achievements and Reflection Skills Through Clinical Peer Assessment and Feedback.通过临床同伴评估和反馈培养牙科学生的学术成就和反思技能。
J Dent Educ. 2016 Aug;80(8):914-23.
10
A Simple and Sustainable Exercise to Enhance Student Self-Reflection on Error-Making, Focus Support, and Guide Curricular Design.一种简单且可持续的练习,可增强学生对犯错、关注支持的自我反思,并指导课程设计。
Teach Learn Med. 2023 Jan-Mar;35(1):65-72. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2033981. Epub 2022 Feb 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Determining the effectiveness of peer-assisted learning in medical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.确定同伴辅助学习在医学教育中的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020 May 30;15(3):177-184. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.05.002. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Cultivating evidence-based practice through mentorship.通过导师指导培养循证实践。
Appl Nurs Res. 2020 Oct;55:151295. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151295. Epub 2020 May 16.
3
The Impact of Sleep and Circadian Disorders on Physician Burnout.睡眠和昼夜节律紊乱对医生倦怠的影响。
Chest. 2019 Nov;156(5):1022-1030. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
4
Burnout Syndrome amongst Medical Students in Cameroon: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Determinants in Preclinical and Clinical Students.喀麦隆医科学生的职业倦怠综合征:对临床前和临床学生相关决定因素的横断面分析
Psychiatry J. 2019 Jan 3;2019:4157574. doi: 10.1155/2019/4157574. eCollection 2019.
5
Burnout in medical students before residency: A systematic review and meta-analysis.医学生住院医师规范化培训前职业倦怠:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;55:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
6
Medical Student Perceptions of 24-Hour Call.医学生对 24 小时值班的看法。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Mar-Apr;76(2):387-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
7
Medical students' reactions to an experience-based learning model of clinical education.医学生对基于体验式学习的临床教育模式的反应。
Perspect Med Educ. 2013 Apr;2(2):58-71. doi: 10.1007/s40037-013-0061-4.
8
A model of the pre-assessment learning effects of summative assessment in medical education.医学教育总结性评估的预评估学习效果模型。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012 Mar;17(1):39-53. doi: 10.1007/s10459-011-9292-5. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
9
Burnout and physical and mental health among Swedish healthcare workers.瑞典医护人员的职业倦怠与身心健康
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):84-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04580.x.
10
What is feedback in clinical education?临床教育中的反馈是什么?
Med Educ. 2008 Feb;42(2):189-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02973.x.