• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

广泛性焦虑障碍量表-7 与宾夕法尼亚州担心问卷在广泛性焦虑障碍治疗中测量反应的心理测量学比较。

Psychometric comparison of the generalized anxiety disorder scale-7 and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for measuring response during treatment of generalised anxiety disorder.

机构信息

Centre for Emotional Health, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Cogn Behav Ther. 2011;40(3):216-27. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2011.582138. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1080/16506073.2011.582138
PMID:21770844
Abstract

The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) is a widely used measure of the worry characteristic of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD). The 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) is a new brief screening tool for GAD, which is being increasingly used in research and clinical practice. The present study sought to provide comparison data on the relative psychometric properties of these two scales. The data of 195 adults who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria for GAD and who participated in two randomised treatment controlled trials were used. Factor analyses, internal consistency, correlational analyses, responsiveness to change, and agreement between the scales based on indentified clinical cutoffs were conducted. Factor analyses confirmed a one-factor structure for the GAD-7 and a three-factor structure involving two method factors for the PSWQ. Both the GAD-7 and the PSWQ demonstrated adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: .79-.91 and .86-.91, respectively), and moderate correlations (r = .51-.71) were observed between the scales across the treatment time points. The scales exhibited small correlations with the Sheehan Disability Scale at pretreatment (GAD-7 r = .38; PSWQ r = .26), but moderate correlations at posttreatment and follow-up (r = .59-.79). Agreement between the scales was limited using various clinical cutoffs identified within the literature. Both measures were sensitive to change, although the GAD-7 appeared to be more sensitive and may, therefore, confer some advantages in clinical work.

摘要

宾夕法尼亚州担忧问卷(PSWQ)是一种广泛用于测量广泛性焦虑症(GAD)特征的担忧的方法。7 项广泛性焦虑症量表(GAD-7)是一种新的用于 GAD 的简短筛查工具,它在研究和临床实践中越来越多地被使用。本研究旨在提供这两种量表相对心理测量特性的比较数据。使用了符合《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM-IV)GAD 标准并参加了两项随机治疗对照试验的 195 名成年人的数据。进行了因素分析、内部一致性、相关分析、对变化的反应性以及基于确定的临床截止值的量表之间的一致性。因素分析证实 GAD-7 具有单因素结构,PSWQ 具有涉及两个方法因素的三因素结构。GAD-7 和 PSWQ 均表现出足够的内部一致性(克伦巴赫的α:分别为.79-.91 和.86-.91),并且在治疗时间点之间观察到量表之间的中度相关性(r =.51-.71)。这些量表在治疗前与 Sheehan 残疾量表呈低度相关(GAD-7 r =.38;PSWQ r =.26),但在治疗后和随访时呈中度相关(r =.59-.79)。使用文献中确定的各种临床截止值,量表之间的一致性有限。两种方法都对变化敏感,尽管 GAD-7 似乎更敏感,因此在临床工作中可能具有一些优势。

相似文献

1
Psychometric comparison of the generalized anxiety disorder scale-7 and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for measuring response during treatment of generalised anxiety disorder.广泛性焦虑障碍量表-7 与宾夕法尼亚州担心问卷在广泛性焦虑障碍治疗中测量反应的心理测量学比较。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2011;40(3):216-27. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2011.582138. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
2
[Evaluation of worry: validation of a French translation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire].[担忧评估:宾夕法尼亚州立大学担忧问卷法语翻译版的效度验证]
Encephale. 2001 Sep-Oct;27(5):475-84.
3
Generalized anxiety disorder in older adults: examining the relation between clinician severity ratings and patient self-report measures.老年人广泛性焦虑障碍:探讨临床医生严重程度评分与患者自我报告测量之间的关系。
Depress Anxiety. 2000;12(4):217-25. doi: 10.1002/1520-6394(2000)12:4<217::AID-DA5>3.0.CO;2-6.
4
Using the Penn State Worry Questionnaire to identify individuals with generalized anxiety disorder: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.使用宾夕法尼亚州立大学忧虑问卷识别广泛性焦虑症患者:一项受试者工作特征分析。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2003 Sep-Dec;34(3-4):283-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2003.09.001.
5
Preliminary validation of an ultra-brief version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire.初步验证宾州州立担忧问卷的超简短版本。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):339-46. doi: 10.1002/cpp.724. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
6
Factor structure of the Dutch version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire.荷兰版宾夕法尼亚州担忧问卷的因子结构。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;41(3):304-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.02.009. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
7
Validity of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale in an acute psychiatric sample.广泛性焦虑障碍 7 项量表在急性精神病样本中的有效性。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):456-64. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1802. Epub 2012 May 17.
8
Psychometric characteristics of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire and Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 and metacognitive predictors of worry and obsessive-compulsive symptoms in a Turkish sample.土耳其样本中宾州忧虑问卷和元认知问卷-30的心理测量特征以及忧虑和强迫症状的元认知预测因素
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2008 Nov-Dec;15(6):424-39. doi: 10.1002/cpp.589.
9
Pathological worry, anxiety disorders and the impact of co-occurrence with depressive and other anxiety disorders.病理性担忧、焦虑症以及与抑郁症和其他焦虑症共病的影响。
J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21(8):1016-27. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.10.015. Epub 2007 Jan 10.
10
Assessing worry in older and younger adults: Psychometric properties of an abbreviated Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ-A).评估老年人和年轻人的担忧:简版宾夕法尼亚州立大学担忧问卷(PSWQ-A)的心理测量特性。
J Anxiety Disord. 2006;20(8):1036-54. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2005.11.006. Epub 2006 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the impact of dexmedetomidine on the vital signs of patients with anxiety at various time intervals upon entering the operating room.分析右美托咪定对进入手术室后不同时间间隔焦虑患者生命体征的影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):663. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07107-5.
2
Mental illness-related stigma and its associated factors among primary health care professionals in rural China.中国农村基层医疗卫生专业人员中与精神疾病相关的耻辱感及其相关因素。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 May 30;16:1519527. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1519527. eCollection 2025.
3
Canonical correlation analysis of anxiety symptom and behavioral inhibition/activation system among college students and their relationship with physical activity.
大学生焦虑症状与行为抑制/激活系统的典型相关分析及其与体育活动的关系。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 20;15(1):17547. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01499-w.
4
A Latent Variable Approach to Affect Variability in Daily Life Accurately Predicts Psychopathology, Especially Depression Symptoms in a Non-Clinical Sample.一种用于影响日常生活中情绪变异性的潜在变量方法能准确预测精神病理学,尤其是非临床样本中的抑郁症状。
J Emot Psychopathol. 2025 Apr 24;1(2):569-588. doi: 10.55913/joep.v1i2.82. Epub 2025 May 3.
5
Interactions Between Sedentary Behaviour, Moderate-Vigorous Intensity Physical Activity and Acute Psychological Stress-Induced Inflammatory Responses.久坐行为、中等强度至剧烈强度身体活动与急性心理应激诱导的炎症反应之间的相互作用
Stress Health. 2025 Jun;41(3):e70038. doi: 10.1002/smi.70038.
6
The Association between Multiple Environmental Exposures and Symptoms of Generalized Anxiety Disorder in a Prospective, US-Based Cohort Study.一项基于美国的前瞻性队列研究中多种环境暴露与广泛性焦虑症症状之间的关联
Environ Health Perspect. 2025 Jun;133(6):67008. doi: 10.1289/EHP14458. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
7
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) and 2-item (GAD-2) scales for detecting anxiety disorders in adults.用于检测成人焦虑症的广泛性焦虑障碍7项(GAD - 7)和2项(GAD - 2)量表。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD015455. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015455.
8
The mediating role of behavioral systems in linking physical activity and anxiety symptoms in college students.行为系统在大学生身体活动与焦虑症状之间的中介作用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 25;15(1):6724. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91294-4.
9
The Bergen 4-Day Treatment for panic disorder patients in a rural clinical setting: a long-term follow-up study.卑尔根针对农村临床环境中惊恐障碍患者的4天治疗:一项长期随访研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 2;25(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06445-0.
10
Clinical Considerations for an Evidence-Based Assessment of Anxiety Disorders in Adults.成人焦虑障碍基于证据评估的临床考虑因素。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2024 Dec;47(4):623-639. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2024.04.009. Epub 2024 May 23.