Suppr超能文献

广泛性焦虑障碍量表-7 与宾夕法尼亚州担心问卷在广泛性焦虑障碍治疗中测量反应的心理测量学比较。

Psychometric comparison of the generalized anxiety disorder scale-7 and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for measuring response during treatment of generalised anxiety disorder.

机构信息

Centre for Emotional Health, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Cogn Behav Ther. 2011;40(3):216-27. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2011.582138. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

Abstract

The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) is a widely used measure of the worry characteristic of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD). The 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) is a new brief screening tool for GAD, which is being increasingly used in research and clinical practice. The present study sought to provide comparison data on the relative psychometric properties of these two scales. The data of 195 adults who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria for GAD and who participated in two randomised treatment controlled trials were used. Factor analyses, internal consistency, correlational analyses, responsiveness to change, and agreement between the scales based on indentified clinical cutoffs were conducted. Factor analyses confirmed a one-factor structure for the GAD-7 and a three-factor structure involving two method factors for the PSWQ. Both the GAD-7 and the PSWQ demonstrated adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: .79-.91 and .86-.91, respectively), and moderate correlations (r = .51-.71) were observed between the scales across the treatment time points. The scales exhibited small correlations with the Sheehan Disability Scale at pretreatment (GAD-7 r = .38; PSWQ r = .26), but moderate correlations at posttreatment and follow-up (r = .59-.79). Agreement between the scales was limited using various clinical cutoffs identified within the literature. Both measures were sensitive to change, although the GAD-7 appeared to be more sensitive and may, therefore, confer some advantages in clinical work.

摘要

宾夕法尼亚州担忧问卷(PSWQ)是一种广泛用于测量广泛性焦虑症(GAD)特征的担忧的方法。7 项广泛性焦虑症量表(GAD-7)是一种新的用于 GAD 的简短筛查工具,它在研究和临床实践中越来越多地被使用。本研究旨在提供这两种量表相对心理测量特性的比较数据。使用了符合《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM-IV)GAD 标准并参加了两项随机治疗对照试验的 195 名成年人的数据。进行了因素分析、内部一致性、相关分析、对变化的反应性以及基于确定的临床截止值的量表之间的一致性。因素分析证实 GAD-7 具有单因素结构,PSWQ 具有涉及两个方法因素的三因素结构。GAD-7 和 PSWQ 均表现出足够的内部一致性(克伦巴赫的α:分别为.79-.91 和.86-.91),并且在治疗时间点之间观察到量表之间的中度相关性(r =.51-.71)。这些量表在治疗前与 Sheehan 残疾量表呈低度相关(GAD-7 r =.38;PSWQ r =.26),但在治疗后和随访时呈中度相关(r =.59-.79)。使用文献中确定的各种临床截止值,量表之间的一致性有限。两种方法都对变化敏感,尽管 GAD-7 似乎更敏感,因此在临床工作中可能具有一些优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验