• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reporting quality of the Delphi technique in reporting guidelines: a protocol for a systematic analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library.报告德尔菲技术在报告指南中的质量:对 EQUATOR 网络库进行系统分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e024942. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024942.
2
The majority of reporting guidelines are not developed with the Delphi method: a systematic review of reporting guidelines.大多数报告指南并非采用德尔菲法制定:报告指南的系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;124:50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
3
ESPACOMP Medication Adherence Reporting Guidelines (EMERGE): a reactive-Delphi study protocol.ESPACOMP药物依从性报告指南(EMERGE):一项德尔菲反应性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 10;7(2):e013496. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013496.
4
Improving outcome reporting in clinical trial reports and protocols: study protocol for the Instrument for reporting Planned Endpoints in Clinical Trials (InsPECT).改善临床试验报告和方案中的结果报告:临床试验计划终点报告工具(InsPECT)的研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Mar 6;20(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3248-0.
5
Essential items for reporting of scaling studies of health interventions (SUCCEED): protocol for a systematic review and Delphi process.健康干预措施定标研究报告的基本要素(SUCCEED):系统评价和德尔菲法的议定书。
Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 11;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1258-3.
6
Guidelines for reporting pediatric and child health clinical trial protocols and reports: study protocol for SPIRIT-Children and CONSORT-Children.儿科和儿童健康临床试验方案和报告报告指南:SPIRIT-Children 和 CONSORT-Children 的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Jan 30;25(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-07948-7.
7
Reporting guidelines for health research: protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library.健康研究报告规范:EQUATOR 网络文库的横断面分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 4;9(3):e022769. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022769.
8
Protocol of reporting items for public versions of guidelines: the Reporting Tool for Practice Guidelines in Health Care-public versions of guidelines.报告卫生保健实践指南公开版本的项目协议:指南公开版本报告工具。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 3;9(3):e023147. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023147.
9
Development of reporting guidance and core outcome sets for seamless, standardised evaluation of innovative surgical procedures and devices: a study protocol for content generation and a Delphi consensus process (COHESIVE study).制定用于创新手术程序和器械无缝、标准化评估的报告指南和核心结局集:内容生成与德尔菲共识过程的研究方案(COHESIVE研究)
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 12;9(9):e029574. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029574.
10
The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement.《行为干预单病例报告指南(SCRIBE)2016声明》
Phys Ther. 2016 Jul;96(7):e1-e10. doi: 10.2522/ptj.2016.96.7.e1.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishing primary care physician commitment in Canadian long-term care homes: a protocol for a modified e-Delphi study.在加拿大长期护理院中确立初级保健医生的参与度:一项改良电子德尔菲研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 7;15(2):e093277. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093277.
2
Development of the assessment standards of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Geriatric Core Set through a modified Delphi method.采用改良德尔菲法制定国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)老年核心组评估标准。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Mar 7;24(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04816-6.
3
The ESA Parastronaut Feasibility Project: Investigating the Need and Contents of Physical Performance Tests for an Inclusive European Astronaut Corps.欧空局准宇航员可行性项目:调查面向包容性欧洲宇航员队伍的体能测试的必要性和内容
Sports Med. 2023 Nov;53(11):2267-2280. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01891-4. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
4
Development of practice-based quality indicators for the primary care of older adults: a RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method study protocol.基于实践的老年初级保健质量指标的制定:一项 RAND/UCLA 适宜性方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 12;13(9):e072232. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072232.
5
The development of the People with Aphasia and Other Layperson Involvement (PAOLI) framework for guiding patient and public involvement (PPI) in aphasia research.失语症患者及其他非专业人士参与(PAOLI)框架的制定,用于指导失语症研究中的患者及公众参与(PPI)。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Sep 1;9(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00484-9.
6
A mixed-methods protocol to develop and validate a stewardship maturity matrix for human genomic data in the cloud.一种用于开发和验证云环境中人类基因组数据管理成熟度矩阵的混合方法方案。
Front Genet. 2022 Oct 14;13:876869. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.876869. eCollection 2022.
7
Existing guidance on reporting of consensus methodology: a systematic review to inform ACCORD guideline development.现有共识方法报告指南:为 ACCORD 指南制定提供信息的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 8;12(9):e065154. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065154.
8
Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?-A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist.用于头颈癌的机器学习:一项稳妥的选择?——面向放射肿瘤学家的临床导向性系统评价
Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 18;11:772663. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.772663. eCollection 2021.
9
A systematic review of classifications systems to determine complexity of patient care needs in palliative care.一项关于确定姑息治疗中患者护理需求复杂性的分类系统的系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2021 Apr;35(4):636-650. doi: 10.1177/0269216321996983. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
10
Improving design choices in Delphi studies in medicine: the case of an exemplary physician multi-round panel study with 100% response.改进医学德尔菲研究中的设计选择:以一项具有 100%应答率的示范性医师多轮小组研究为例。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 15;20(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01029-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical trial design and dissemination: comprehensive analysis of clinicaltrials.gov and PubMed data since 2005.临床试验设计与传播:2005 年以来对 ClinicalTrials.gov 和 PubMed 数据的综合分析。
BMJ. 2018 Jun 6;361:k2130. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2130.
2
Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education research.在医学教育研究中使用德尔菲法和名义群体法等共识小组方法。
Med Teach. 2017 Jan;39(1):14-19. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1245856. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
3
Methodology and reporting quality of reporting guidelines: systematic review.报告指南的方法学与报告质量:系统评价
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Sep 22;15:74. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0069-z.
4
Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies.定义共识:系统评价为 Delphi 研究报告推荐了方法学标准。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;67(4):401-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002.
5
Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses.评价发表的系统评价和荟萃分析的质量对首选报告项目的系统评价和荟萃分析 (PRISMA) 声明的认可。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 26;8(12):e83138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083138. eCollection 2013.
6
Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics.医学统计学中免费易用软件 EZR 的调查研究。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Mar;48(3):452-8. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
7
Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines.健康研究报告规范开发者指南。
PLoS Med. 2010 Feb 16;7(2):e1000217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000217.
8
Guidelines for reporting health research: the EQUATOR network's survey of guideline authors.健康研究报告指南:赤道网络对指南作者的调查
PLoS Med. 2008 Jun 24;5(6):e139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050139.
9
Identifying outcome-based indicators and developing a curriculum for a continuing medical education programme on rational prescribing using a modified Delphi process.通过改良的德尔菲法确定基于结果的指标,并为合理用药继续医学教育项目制定课程。
BMC Med Educ. 2008 May 30;8:33. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-8-33.
10
A comparison of two consensus methods for classifying morbidities in a single professional group showed the same outcomes.对单一专业群体中疾病分类的两种共识方法进行比较,结果显示相同。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Nov;59(11):1169-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.016. Epub 2006 Jul 26.

报告德尔菲技术在报告指南中的质量:对 EQUATOR 网络库进行系统分析的方案。

Reporting quality of the Delphi technique in reporting guidelines: a protocol for a systematic analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Seichiryo Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.

Department of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e024942. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024942.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024942
PMID:30948575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6500274/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Reporting guidelines are important tools for improving the quality of medical research. The Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network's Library contains a comprehensive and up-to-date database of reporting guidelines relevant to health research. Only 31% of reporting guidelines published from 2010 to 2014 reported using the Delphi technique, and the reporting quality of the Delphi technique in reporting guidelines is unknown even though the use of the Delphi technique was recommended in the guidance for reporting guidelines. We will assess the quality reports of the Delphi technique or modified Delphi technique in reporting guidelines.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The present study is a systematic analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library. We will include all reporting guidelines in the EQUATOR Network that used the Delphi technique or modified Delphi technique, published since 1 January 2011 and registered in the EQUATOR on or before 31 May 2018. Our primary outcome is the reporting quality of the Delphi technique, measured by the quality score (each item) in the Delphi technique. We will also examine the relationship between the reporting quality score (each item) of the Delphi technique and year of publication, number of authors, impact factor, sources of funding (industry, non-industry), multiple publications and whether the guidelines are published in open access policy.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval will not be applicable for this study. This protocol has been registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry. We will publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal and may also present them at conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000032685.

摘要

简介

报告规范是提高医学研究质量的重要工具。EQUATOR 网络图书馆包含了一个全面且最新的与健康研究相关的报告规范数据库。在 2010 年至 2014 年期间发表的报告规范中,仅有 31% 报告了使用 Delphi 技术,尽管报告规范指南建议使用 Delphi 技术,但 Delphi 技术在报告规范中的报告质量仍然未知。我们将评估报告规范中 Delphi 技术或改良 Delphi 技术的质量报告。

方法与分析

本研究是对 EQUATOR 网络图书馆的系统分析。我们将纳入 EQUATOR 网络中自 2011 年 1 月 1 日起使用 Delphi 技术或改良 Delphi 技术、并于 2018 年 5 月 31 日或之前在 EQUATOR 注册的所有报告规范。我们的主要结果是 Delphi 技术的报告质量,通过 Delphi 技术的质量评分(每项)进行衡量。我们还将研究 Delphi 技术报告质量评分(每项)与出版年份、作者人数、影响因子、资金来源(行业、非行业)、多次发表以及指南是否遵循开放获取政策之间的关系。

伦理与传播

本研究不需要伦理批准。该方案已在大学医院医疗信息网络临床试验注册中心注册。我们将在同行评议的期刊上发表我们的研究结果,并可能在会议上进行报告。

注册号

UMIN000032685。