Ma Penglin, Wang Tao, Gong Yichun, Liu Jingtao, Shi Wei, Zeng Lin
Critical Care Medicine Department, Guiqian International General Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU), The 8th Medical Center of General Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 9;9:839637. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.839637. eCollection 2022.
The study aimed to explore factors associated with deep sedation practice in intensive care units (ICUs).
A analysis was conducted for a cross-sectional survey on sedation practices in mechanically ventilated (MV) patients, combined with a questionnaire for physicians regarding their preferences for light sedation (P-pls Score) in 92 Chinese ICUs.
There were 457 and 127 eligible MV patients in the light and deep sedation groups respectively. A multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the control mode of mechanical ventilation, plasma lactate level, and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score were independent risk factors for deep sedation practice ( <0.01). Notably, the adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) of the average P-pls score in the ICU ≤ 2 for deep sedation practice was 1.861 (1.163, 2.978, = 0.01). In addition, the areas under curves of receiver operating characteristics (AUC-ROC) of the model to predict the probability of deep sedation practice were 0.753 (0.699, 0.806) and 0.772 (0.64, 0.905) in the training set and the validation set, respectively. The 28-day mortality was increased in patients with exposure to deep sedation practice but not significantly.
Both factors related to stressful stimuli and the ICU physicians' perception of patient tolerability in mechanical ventilation were likely associated with deep sedation practice in MV patients.
本研究旨在探讨重症监护病房(ICU)中与深度镇静实践相关的因素。
对机械通气(MV)患者的镇静实践进行横断面调查分析,并对92家中国ICU的医生进行关于轻度镇静偏好(P-pls评分)的问卷调查。
轻度镇静组和深度镇静组分别有457例和127例符合条件的MV患者。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,机械通气的控制模式、血浆乳酸水平和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分是深度镇静实践的独立危险因素(<0.01)。值得注意的是,ICU中平均P-pls评分≤2时深度镇静实践的调整优势比(95%CI)为1.861(1.163,2.978,=0.01)。此外,该模型预测深度镇静实践概率的受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC-ROC)在训练集和验证集中分别为0.753(0.699,0.806)和0.772(0.64,0.905)。接受深度镇静实践的患者28天死亡率有所增加,但无显著差异。
与应激刺激相关的因素以及ICU医生对机械通气患者耐受性的认知可能都与MV患者的深度镇静实践有关。