• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人们使用异质性和少数民族代表性来评估多样性。

People use both heterogeneity and minority representation to evaluate diversity.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, New York University, New York, NY 10012, USA.

Department of Sociology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.

出版信息

Sci Adv. 2021 Mar 12;7(11). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf2507. Print 2021 Mar.

DOI:10.1126/sciadv.abf2507
PMID:33712467
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7954444/
Abstract

The term "diversity," although widely used, can mean different things. Diversity can refer to heterogeneity, i.e., the distribution of people across groups, or to the representation of specific minority groups. We use a conjoint experiment with a race-balanced, national sample to uncover which properties, heterogeneity or minority representation, Americans use to evaluate the extent of racial diversity a neighborhood and whether this assessment varies by participants' race. We show that perceived diversity is strongly associated with heterogeneity. This association is stronger for Whites than for Blacks, Latinos, or Asians. In addition, Blacks, Latinos, and Asians view neighborhoods where their own group is largest as more diverse. Whites vary in their tendency to associate diversity with representation, and Whites who report conservative stances on diversity-related policy issues view predominately White neighborhoods as more diverse than predominately Black neighborhoods. People can agree that diversity is desirable while disagreeing on what makes a community diverse.

摘要

“多样性”一词虽然被广泛使用,但它的含义可能不同。多样性可以指异质性,即人们在群体之间的分布,也可以指特定少数群体的代表性。我们使用一项具有种族平衡、全国性样本的联合实验,揭示美国人使用哪些特性(异质性或少数群体代表性)来评估邻里的种族多样性程度,以及这种评估是否因参与者的种族而有所不同。我们表明,感知到的多样性与异质性密切相关。这种关联在白人中比在黑人和拉丁裔或亚裔中更强。此外,黑人和拉丁裔以及亚裔认为自己所在群体最多的社区更加多样化。白人在将多样性与代表性联系起来的倾向方面存在差异,并且在与多样性相关的政策问题上持保守立场的白人认为,以白人为多数的社区比以黑人为多数的社区更加多样化。人们可以同意多样性是可取的,同时对是什么使一个社区多样化存在分歧。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abfc/7954444/39c5dcf356d5/abf2507-F5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abfc/7954444/6db6e8ef5462/abf2507-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abfc/7954444/3173f650de5e/abf2507-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abfc/7954444/6040640b76f6/abf2507-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abfc/7954444/67dbc2573281/abf2507-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abfc/7954444/39c5dcf356d5/abf2507-F5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abfc/7954444/6db6e8ef5462/abf2507-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abfc/7954444/3173f650de5e/abf2507-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abfc/7954444/6040640b76f6/abf2507-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abfc/7954444/67dbc2573281/abf2507-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abfc/7954444/39c5dcf356d5/abf2507-F5.jpg

相似文献

1
People use both heterogeneity and minority representation to evaluate diversity.人们使用异质性和少数民族代表性来评估多样性。
Sci Adv. 2021 Mar 12;7(11). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf2507. Print 2021 Mar.
2
Global Neighborhoods: Beyond the Multiethnic Metropolis.全球社区:超越多民族大都市
Demography. 2016 Dec;53(6):1933-1953. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0516-4.
3
Variation in access to health care for different racial/ethnic groups by the racial/ethnic composition of an individual's county of residence.根据个人居住县的种族/族裔构成,不同种族/族裔群体获得医疗保健服务的差异。
Med Care. 2004 Jul;42(7):707-14. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000129906.95881.83.
4
The determinants of neighborhood satisfaction: racial proxy revisited.邻里满意度的决定因素:重新审视种族代理。
Demography. 2011 Aug;48(3):1203-29. doi: 10.1007/s13524-011-0047-y.
5
Segregation by race and income in the United States 1970-2010.1970 - 2010年美国按种族和收入的隔离情况。
Soc Sci Res. 2016 Nov;60:45-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
6
For blacks in America, the gap in neighborhood poverty has declined faster than segregation.对于美国的黑人来说,邻里贫困差距的缩小速度比种族隔离的缩小速度更快。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 22;113(47):13372-13377. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607220113. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
7
Residential hierarchy in Los Angeles: an examination of ethnic and documentation status differences.洛杉矶的居住等级制度:对种族和文件状态差异的考察
Soc Sci Res. 2014 May;45:170-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.12.013. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
8
State-specific prevalence of selected health behaviors, by race and ethnicity--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1997.按种族和族裔划分的特定州选定健康行为的患病率——行为风险因素监测系统,1997年
MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2000 Mar 24;49(2):1-60.
9
Racial Differences in Neighborhood Attainment: The Contributions of Interneighborhood Migration and In Situ Change.邻里获得方面的种族差异:邻里间迁移和原地变化的贡献。
Demography. 2017 Oct;54(5):1819-1843. doi: 10.1007/s13524-017-0606-y.
10
Republic of South Africa: unraveling the population puzzle. Country profile.南非共和国:解开人口谜团。国家概况。
Int Demogr. 1984 Jun;3(6):4-11.

引用本文的文献

1
The differential impacts of team diversity as variability versus atypicality on team effectiveness.团队多样性作为变异性与非典型性对团队效能的不同影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 6;15(1):4461. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86483-0.
2
Accountability for Reasonableness as a Framework for the Promotion of Fair and Equitable Research.作为促进公平公正研究框架的合理性问责制。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 Dec;54 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S66-S72. doi: 10.1002/hast.4931.
3
Beliefs about minority representation in policing and support for diversification.对警察队伍中少数族裔代表性的看法与对多元化的支持。

本文引用的文献

1
Diversity and prosocial behavior.多样性与亲社会行为。
Science. 2020 Sep 4;369(6508):1183-1187. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2432.
2
Show Don't Tell: Diversity Dishonesty Harms Racial/Ethnic Minorities at Work.以身作则,而非空口白话:多样性不诚实会伤害职场中的少数族裔。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Aug;46(8):1171-1185. doi: 10.1177/0146167219897149. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
3
Decision-Making Processes in Social Contexts.社会背景下的决策过程
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Dec 27;119(52):e2213986119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2213986119. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
4
Racial attention deficit.种族注意力缺陷。
Sci Adv. 2021 Sep 17;7(38):eabg9508. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg9508.
Annu Rev Sociol. 2017 Jul;43:207-227. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053622. Epub 2017 May 12.
4
Love Thy Neighbor? Ethnoracial Diversity and Trust Reexamined.爱你的邻居?对种族多样性与信任的重新审视。
AJS. 2015 Nov;121(3):722-82. doi: 10.1086/683144.
5
Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior.对照现实世界行为验证案例和联合调查实验。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Feb 24;112(8):2395-400. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416587112. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
6
Diverse According to Whom? Racial group membership and concerns about discrimination shape diversity judgments.根据谁的标准来划分多样性?种族群体成员身份以及对歧视的担忧塑造了多样性判断。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Oct;40(10):1354-72. doi: 10.1177/0146167214543881. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
7
Diversity is what you want it to be: how social-dominance motives affect construals of diversity.多样性由你定义:社会支配动机如何影响多样性的构建。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Mar;23(3):303-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797611426727. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
8
Diversity is in the eye of the beholder: how concern for the in-group affects perceptions of racial diversity.多样性在观察者眼中:对内群体的关注如何影响对种族多样性的看法。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Jan;38(1):26-38. doi: 10.1177/0146167211418528. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
9
Which racial groups are associated with diversity?哪些种族群体与多样性有关?
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2010 Jul;16(3):443-6. doi: 10.1037/a0019723.