Prokop Andreas
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Cytoskeleton (Hoboken). 2021 Feb;78(2):52-63. doi: 10.1002/cm.21657. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
The number of acquired or inherited conditions leading to axon degeneration (from now on referred to as axonopathies) is vast. To diagnose patients, clinicians use a range of indicators including physiology, morphology, family and patient history, as well as genetics, with the specific location of the lesion within the nervous system being a prominent feature. For the neurobiologist, these criteria are often unsatisfactory, and key questions remain unanswered. For example, does it make sense that different axonopathies affect distinct neuron groups through distinct mechanisms? Would it not be more likely that there are common routes to axon degeneration? In this opinion piece, I shall pose this fundamental question and try to find answers that are hopefully thought-provoking and trigger some conceptual rethinking in the field. I will conclude by describing the 'dependency cycle of axon homeostasis' as a new approach to make sense of the intricate connections of axon biology and physiology, also suggesting that different axonopathies might share common paths to axon degeneration.
导致轴突退化的后天性或遗传性疾病(以下简称轴突病)数量众多。为了诊断患者,临床医生使用一系列指标,包括生理学、形态学、家族史和患者病史以及遗传学,而病变在神经系统中的特定位置是一个突出特征。对于神经生物学家来说,这些标准往往不尽人意,关键问题仍然没有答案。例如,不同的轴突病通过不同的机制影响不同的神经元群体,这有意义吗?轴突退化难道不是更有可能存在共同途径吗?在这篇观点文章中,我将提出这个基本问题,并试图找到一些答案,希望这些答案能发人深省,并引发该领域的一些概念性反思。我将通过描述“轴突稳态依赖循环”来得出结论,这是一种理解轴突生物学和生理学复杂联系的新方法,同时也表明不同的轴突病可能在轴突退化方面有共同的途径。