Suppr超能文献

在领土范围内,通过“可疑筛选”从城市污水处理厂废水中识别出的新关注污染物的生态毒理学风险评估。

Ecotoxicological risk assessment of contaminants of emerging concern identified by "suspect screening" from urban wastewater treatment plant effluents at a territorial scale.

机构信息

Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, ENTPE, UMR5023 LEHNA, F-69518 Vaulx-en-Velin, France; Université de Lyon & Université Lyon 2, Lyon, F-69007, CNRS, UMR 5824 GATE Lyon Saint-Etienne, Ecully F-69130, France; Ecole Urbaine de Lyon, Institut Convergences, Commissariat général aux investissements d'avenir, Bât. Atrium, 43 Boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, F-69616 Villeurbanne, France.

Univ Lyon, CNRS, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Institut des Sciences Analytiques, UMR 5280, 5 Rue de la Doua, F-69100 Villeurbanne, France.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jul 15;778:146275. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146275. Epub 2021 Mar 8.

Abstract

Urban wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) are a major vector of highly ecotoxic contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) for urban and sub-urban streams. Ecotoxicological risk assessments (ERAs) provide essential information to public environmental authorities. Nevertheless, ERAs are mainly performed at very local scale (one or few WWTPs) and on pre-selected list of CECs. To cope with these limits, the present study aims to develop a territorial-scale ERA on CECs previously identified by a "suspect screening" analytical approach (LC-QToF-MS) and quantified in the effluents of 10 WWTPs of a highly urbanized territory during three periods of the year. Among CECs, this work focused on pharmaceutical residue and pesticides. ERA was conducted following two complementary methods: (1) a single substance approach, based on the calculation for each CEC of risk quotients (RQs) by the ratio of Predicted Environmental Concentration (PEC) and Predicted No Effect Concentration (PNEC), and (2) mixture risk assessment ("cocktail effect") based on a concentration addition model (CA), summing individual RQs. Chemical results led to an ERA for 41 CEC (37 pharmaceuticals and 4 pesticides) detected in treated effluents. Single substance ERA identified 19 CECs implicated in at least one significant risk for streams, with significant risks for DEET, diclofenac, lidocaine, atenolol, terbutryn, atorvastatin, methocarbamol, and venlafaxine (RQs reaching 39.84, 62.10, 125.58, 179.11, 348.24, 509.27, 1509.71 and 3097.37, respectively). Mixture ERA allowed the identification of a risk (RQmix > 1) for 9 of the 10 WWTPs studied. It was also remarked that CECs leading individually to a negligible risk could imply a significant risk in a mixture. Finally, the territorial ERA showed a diversity of risk situations, with the highest concerns for 3 WWTPs: the 2 biggest of the territory discharging into a large French river, the Rhône, and for the smallest WWTP that releases into a small intermittent stream.

摘要

城市污水处理厂(WWTP)是城市和郊区溪流中新兴关注的高度生态毒性污染物(CECs)的主要载体。生态毒理学风险评估(ERA)为公共环境当局提供了重要信息。然而,ERA 主要在非常局部的尺度(一个或几个 WWTP)和预先选择的 CEC 清单上进行。为了应对这些限制,本研究旨在开发一种基于“可疑筛选”分析方法(LC-QToF-MS)先前确定的 CEC 的领土规模 ERA,并在一年内三个时期对 10 个 WWTP 的废水进行定量分析。在 CEC 中,这项工作侧重于药物残留和农药。ERA 采用两种互补方法进行:(1)单一物质方法,根据每个 CEC 的预测环境浓度(PEC)与预测无影响浓度(PNEC)的比值计算风险比(RQ),以及(2)基于浓度加和模型(CA)的混合物风险评估(“鸡尾酒效应”),对个别 RQ 进行求和。化学结果导致对 41 种在处理废水中检测到的 CEC(37 种药物和 4 种农药)进行 ERA。单一物质 ERA 确定了 19 种 CEC,其中至少有一种对溪流有显著风险,其中 DEET、双氯芬酸、利多卡因、阿替洛尔、特布他林、阿托伐他汀、美托拉宗和文拉法辛的风险显著,RQ 分别达到 39.84、62.10、125.58、179.11、348.24、509.27、1509.71 和 3097.37。混合物 ERA 确定了研究的 10 个 WWTP 中的 9 个存在风险(RQmix>1)。还注意到,单独导致可忽略风险的 CEC 可能在混合物中存在显著风险。最后,领土 ERA 显示了各种风险情况,其中 3 个 WWTP 最令人担忧:该领土上最大的 2 个 WWTP 排入法国的罗纳河,以及最小的 WWTP 排入一条小间歇性溪流。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验